Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 11:11 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Rules
#71
RE: The Rules
Hey, just wanted to apologize to the staff for my thoughtless joke. Won't happen again, and I'll take whatever lashes you dole out without miff.

Sorry, guys.

Reply
#72
RE: The Rules
(January 23, 2015 at 2:49 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: Hey, just wanted to apologize to the staff for my thoughtless joke. Won't happen again, and I'll take whatever lashes you dole out without miff.

Sorry, guys.

What thoughtless joke?
Reply
#73
RE: The Rules
The one he didn't think of?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#74
RE: The Rules
(January 23, 2015 at 2:42 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: Throw it in the oven. 250 for 3 hours 15 mintues. Cure those brains.

Sadly, those brains are incurable.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#75
RE: The Rules
You don't gots ma mad curin' skills.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#76
RE: The Rules
(January 23, 2015 at 1:24 am)whateverist Wrote:
(January 23, 2015 at 12:45 am)Losty Wrote: Then there's the necroposting rule. If I ever receive an official warning regarding this, then I'll consider not doing it. I think it's a terrible rule Angel

Bad as you want to be.


Yeah, it is a weird rule .. or is it really a guideline? Damned if I know. But I sure wish no one had to do anything about it. If no one responds because everyone involved has moved on .. whatever. Let the noob talk to themselves or to whoever shows up that is interested for all I care. Just hate that anyone has to be bothered by it.

Yea yea guidelines schmuidelines. I don't think I have ever necrod anything that annoyed someone, but....I do tend to rep those who do it. I'm not rebellious enough to intentionally do things that might annoy mods. I know their job is tough and without pay. I just think bad rules are meant to be broken. If we can't call people out, but want to respond to a post in an old thread, our only option is to necro that thread. And if the user happens to be someone who doesn't hang about anymore...so what? We can continue the conversation without them or let the thread die again. If you create a new thread about the same topic, cool. If you comment in an old one and get the conversation started back up, cool. I don't see how one is better than the other. That's why it's good as a guideline only. Necroposting in the occasional interesting old thread never hurt anyone even if the person you respond to isn't here anymore. But...necroposting 8 100 year old threads about shit topics in your first week on the forum can be kind of annoying.

(January 23, 2015 at 3:01 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: You don't gots ma mad curin' skills.

Heart
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#77
RE: The Rules
It's really funny when there's some dusty thread like, whatever, "Proof that Jesus is gay" that had been sitting untouched since the stone age of 2007, and suddenly some random guy miraculously digs it out 7 years later and posts like "Jesus is totes not gay, loosers!". I always wonder how they find this stuff, does Google searches turn up old threads and attract these people?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#78
RE: The Rules
(January 23, 2015 at 2:54 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(January 23, 2015 at 2:49 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: Hey, just wanted to apologize to the staff for my thoughtless joke. Won't happen again, and I'll take whatever lashes you dole out without miff.

Sorry, guys.

What thoughtless joke?

The one which required a mod edit, and report. I thought it would be funny, but hey, everyone has an off-night. Anyway, apologies about it, I'll think more.

(January 23, 2015 at 3:35 am)Losty Wrote: We can continue the conversation without them or let the thread die again. If you create a new thread about the same topic, cool. If you comment in an old one and get the conversation started back up, cool.

I've seen, on more than one forum, the phenomenon where if you necro a post, you're told by the readership to stop necroing threads, and if you start your own thread on a topic already covered, you get told, "We have 17 threads about this already."

I like the idea of necroing threads. I started a thread one time elsewhere as a contest, to see who could come up with the oldest necro. I think it's cool to see a site's history like that.

Reply
#79
RE: The Rules
There is a minor annoyance with necro'ed threads when people don't realize that it's been bumped and they respond to the early posts, then find that those posts are months or years old. For the occasional and meaningful bump, that's not an issue and can even be funny. When you have people who bump one old topic after another --especially to add some meaningless one-sentence reply-- it's no longer just annoying.

I do prefer DP's idea of consolidating a lot of the common arguments into a topic with links, to avoid the "don't necro, but don't start the same topic again" comments. It helps in those periods when there are a lot of new posters who bring up arguments we just finished discussing at length, or those who think that "Josephus spoke about the Christ" is some new and earth-shattering revelation for atheists.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#80
RE: The Rules
(January 23, 2015 at 2:49 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: Hey, just wanted to apologize to the staff for my thoughtless joke. Won't happen again, and I'll take whatever lashes you dole out without miff.

Sorry, guys.

Did someone say "lashes"?
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Area 69 Rules Update Cyberman 34 5848 July 27, 2017 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Can you figure out The Rules? Tiberius 0 953 April 1, 2017 at 11:43 am
Last Post: Tiberius
  New Rules Tiberius 20 5032 September 3, 2015 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  New Rules (Member Review) Tiberius 29 11192 September 3, 2015 at 2:11 am
Last Post: surreptitious57
  New Administrator / Moderator Notices + Rules Update Tiberius 38 6823 July 15, 2015 at 1:01 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Announcement: Rules update Jackalope 1 1826 August 17, 2014 at 3:41 am
Last Post: Mystical
  Introduction subforum rules and enforcement policy - you need to read this. Jackalope 21 6965 May 1, 2014 at 5:37 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  New Username Rules Tiberius 35 12277 January 24, 2014 at 1:37 am
Last Post: Creed of Heresy
  An Update of the Rules Rayaan 8 4497 August 24, 2013 at 5:33 am
Last Post: Kayenneh
  New Area 69 Rules Tiberius 22 10380 February 7, 2013 at 9:42 pm
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)