Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 3, 2024, 5:12 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 12:43 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: As someone who just won't wade through that whole thread of bile I don't understand why anyone is upset with the thread's OP.  My suspicion is it is related to the whole anti-feminism slant that is so common here and among so many atheists.  On the face of it, I don't see a problem with bitching about un-equal treatment even if its basis is entirely innocuous.  I have no problem with copping to the charge that I post on a forum with a (very slightly) sexist policy.  I don't on that account feel that I have a sexism problem any more than our moderation team or site owner does.  It is a very low grade of sexism to be charged with and I willingly accept it, and then immediately shrug it off.

I've found her few other posts fine in every regard and more than interesting enough.

I don't think anyone was particularly upset with her op? It wasn't really taken seriously but I didn't see anyone who seemed angry over it
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 2:57 pm)Losty Wrote: I don't think anyone was particularly upset with her op? It wasn't really taken seriously but I didn't see anyone who seemed angry over it

I am upset. I have fought for real previleges for men and women at my workplace, face to face with the HR department there. Men got 60 euros after two years of contract, women did not, for the same work position. I pointed out that such was unfair, and it was drawed back... All I wanted was that everyone could get the same raise men or women, All I did was to remove that from men and turn myself into a real popular guy. You might think it was a move by me to get into my female coworkers panties, but they stood to lose as alot of them had husbands working there, and their money was coming to the household.

So yeah, forgive me for caring little about a little bitch feeling entitled to moan over tits in an online forum.
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 4:12 pm)0000 Wrote:
(July 5, 2016 at 2:57 pm)Losty Wrote: I don't think anyone was particularly upset with her op? It wasn't really taken seriously but I didn't see anyone who seemed angry over it

I am upset. I have fought for real previleges for men and women at my workplace, face to face with the HR department there. Men got 60 euros after two years of contract, women did not, for the same work position. I pointed out that such was unfair, and it was drawed back... All I wanted was that everyone could get the same raise men or women, All I did was to remove that from men and turn myself into a real popular guy. You might think it was a move by me to get into my female coworkers panties, but they stood to lose as alot of them had husbands working there, and their money was coming to the household.

So yeah, forgive me for caring little about a little bitch feeling entitled to moan over tits in an online forum.

Lightbulb

Can we please refer to them as "teh boobiez"?

Seriously though, kudos for your efforts on behalf of your staff.
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 4:24 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:
(July 5, 2016 at 4:12 pm)0000 Wrote: I am upset. I have fought for real previleges for men and women at my workplace, face to face with the HR department there. Men got 60 euros after two years of contract, women did not, for the same work position. I pointed out that such was unfair, and it was drawed back... All I wanted was that everyone could get the same raise men or women, All I did was to remove that from men and turn myself into a real popular guy. You might think it was a move by me to get into my female coworkers panties, but they stood to lose as alot of them had husbands working there, and their money was coming to the household.

So yeah, forgive me for caring little about a little bitch feeling entitled to moan over tits in an online forum.

Lightbulb

Can we please refer to them as "teh boobiez"?

Seriously though, kudos for your efforts on behalf of your staff.

I am free Beccs. I can call a spade a spade without putting a team on the line. Without someone saying that my reasoning is unvalid for being in a preported sexist forum staff. It was one of the reasons I left. And by consequence opened up the place for new mods. It was good.
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 4:24 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Can we please refer to them as "teh boobiez"?

If you insist but I kinda liked "Righty" and "Lefty". Whatever we're calling them now give those little sweater pups a squeeze for me.
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 4:35 pm)0000 Wrote: I am free Beccs. I can call a spade a spade without putting a team on the line. Without someone saying that my reasoning is unvalid for being in a  preported sexist forum staff. It was one of the reasons I left. And by consequence opened up the place for new mods. It was good.

So Poet I certainly see no reason to deny the policy is sexist and I don't see why anyone else would. But I wonder if you agree with me that the sexism inherent in having an imbalanced nipple policy -especially for the reasons it exists- is not especially egregious? All things considered I'd prefer that it didn't exist, and if there wasn't a cost associated with ditching it I'd certainly be on board for changing it. Perhaps if I had been donating as much sweat equity as you have I'd feel more entitled to insist the policy be more aligned with my values. But being the cheap slacker I am, I feel compelled to defer to the person writing the checks on this one. Sorry for all the bad feeling this has unleashed though, especially for you.
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 5:29 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote:
(July 5, 2016 at 4:35 pm)0000 Wrote: I am free Beccs. I can call a spade a spade without putting a team on the line. Without someone saying that my reasoning is unvalid for being in a  preported sexist forum staff. It was one of the reasons I left. And by consequence opened up the place for new mods. It was good.

So Poet I certainly see no reason to deny the policy is sexist and I don't see why anyone else would.  But I wonder if you agree with me that the sexism inherent in having an imbalanced nipple policy -especially for the reasons it exists- is not especially egregious?  All things considered I'd prefer that it didn't exist, and if there wasn't a cost associated with ditching it I'd certainly be on board for changing it.  Perhaps if I had been donating as much sweat equity as you have I'd feel more entitled to insist the policy be more aligned with my values.  But being the cheap slacker I am, I feel compelled to defer to the person writing the checks on this one.  Sorry for all the bad feeling this has unleashed though, especially for you.

His entire point seemed to be that it is egregious and that there's no point in making a stink about it when there are real issues that people should be concerned with.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
(July 5, 2016 at 5:29 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote:
(July 5, 2016 at 4:35 pm)0000 Wrote: I am free Beccs. I can call a spade a spade without putting a team on the line. Without someone saying that my reasoning is unvalid for being in a  preported sexist forum staff. It was one of the reasons I left. And by consequence opened up the place for new mods. It was good.

So Poet I certainly see no reason to deny the policy is sexist and I don't see why anyone else would.  But I wonder if you agree with me that the sexism inherent in having an imbalanced nipple policy -especially for the reasons it exists- is not especially egregious?  All things considered I'd prefer that it didn't exist, and if there wasn't a cost associated with ditching it I'd certainly be on board for changing it.  Perhaps if I had been donating as much sweat equity as you have I'd feel more entitled to insist the policy be more aligned with my values.  But being the cheap slacker I am, I feel compelled to defer to the person writing the checks on this one.  Sorry for all the bad feeling this has unleashed though, especially for you.

From a cheap bastard too, I never denied the case. If we can get society to accept girl boobs being shown, then I am sure the forum will be also following suit. And then happiness will ensue. Usually this kind of drives ends up giving restrictions to all, than to work hard to end restrictions to the few. Calling an online forum sexist for upholding a generally sexist trait of society at large is disingenuous at best and fucked up after the accusations thrown at the staff. It only makes it worse when said cruzade is spanning multiple forums. It is something as stupid as trying to build a house, starting by the roof.
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
Let's start a campaign to free the boobs
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
RE: [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
Free boobs? Is there something I have to sign?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like. Whateverist 4493 694756 March 31, 2021 at 5:55 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum? Heatheness 702 64641 July 7, 2016 at 2:08 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action Shell B 94 43980 June 2, 2012 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet
  [split] Quoting Full Articles Violet 8 3845 April 27, 2010 at 11:34 am
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)