(March 15, 2016 at 11:07 pm)KUSA Wrote:

(March 15, 2016 at 10:43 pm)Sterben Wrote: I don't like either of them, she's not very bright and he's a dangerous Psychopath. It makes me really consider not voting and taking my chances. I know it's not the responsible choice to make but it's what I'm really feeling. As much as I hate say this; I'm voting for Hillary since I don't have the money or the skills to be able to run to Canada, but I do have the money to run to Mexico. I don't what be worse, Mexico or living in a country were Trump is president.

If you weren't an entitled socialist you might have more money.

        A socialist believe system is what I have, and I'm far from entitled. I don't get food stamps or welfare and I pay more then my share in taxes. Single and unmarried people without children are hit harder then people with children and married. How is fair that you have a couple of children and for 18 years you get more money back then you put in? I'm almost 30 years old and have managed to stay single without having children all this time which is quite good I think. Am I selfish for not wanting children or to be in a relationship, I don't think so; also, I've done alright for myself with the tools I've been given. We don't need higher taxes on the middle and poor, we need the wealthy to clean up the mess they have caused. So, for the record KUSA I make to much to qualify for any type of government assistance. I could get some assistance for collage but would have to take student loans out as well and I'm not stupid enough to do that.

(March 15, 2016 at 11:30 pm)Sterben Wrote:         A socialist believe system is what I have, and I'm far from entitled. I don't get food stamps or welfare and I pay more then my share in taxes. Single and unmarried people without children are hit harder then people with children and married. How is fair that you have a couple of children and for 18 years you get more money back then you put in? I'm almost 30 years old and have managed to stay single without having children all this time which is quite good I think. I've done alright for myself with the tools I've been given. We don't need higher taxes on the middle and poor, we need the wealthy to clean up the mess they have caused. So, for the record KUSA I make to much to qualify for any type of government assistance. I could get some assistance for collage but would have to take student loans out and I'm not stupid enough to do that.

Children are dependents.  They aren't able to work.  It makes sense to give tax breaks to people with dependents.  And it allows them to attend school, instead of getting a job working for whatever companies are able to exploit them for.

If you think Trump is running for president to "make America great again", you haven't been paying attention. Has he specified the era of American greatness he plans to single handedly usher us to? The Dwight "Ike" Eisenhower years minus segregation and the lack of equal rights might be nice. Or possibly the Reagan years with it's highly effective "trickle down economics"?

I've never seen so many people so desperate to gobble up such an obvious snowjob.

(March 15, 2016 at 11:34 pm)Kosh Wrote: If you think Trump is running for president to "make America great again", you haven't been paying attention.  Has he specified the era of American greatness he plans to single handedly usher us to?  The Dwight "Ike" Eisenhower years minus segregation and the lack of equal rights might be nice.  Or possibly the Reagan years with it's highly effective "trickle down economics"?

I've never seen so many people so desperate to gobble up such an obvious snowjob.

        He does attract the stupid like a moth to a flame. All that is offered by him is false promises and getting screwed so his friends can get rich off the stupid. There is be many wars caused by this man and the military industrial complex will rake in billions at the cost of more American lives. Your funny as well Kosh about the trickle down economics.Regan was one of the worst presidents ever to be elected, and yet we still can not learn anything from burning our hand on the hot stove.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzuG5Hb9bGE

(March 15, 2016 at 11:34 pm)Cecelia Wrote:

(March 15, 2016 at 11:30 pm)Sterben Wrote:         A socialist believe system is what I have, and I'm far from entitled. I don't get food stamps or welfare and I pay more then my share in taxes. Single and unmarried people without children are hit harder then people with children and married. How is fair that you have a couple of children and for 18 years you get more money back then you put in? I'm almost 30 years old and have managed to stay single without having children all this time which is quite good I think. I've done alright for myself with the tools I've been given. We don't need higher taxes on the middle and poor, we need the wealthy to clean up the mess they have caused. So, for the record KUSA I make to much to qualify for any type of government assistance. I could get some assistance for collage but would have to take student loans out and I'm not stupid enough to do that.

Children are dependents.  They aren't able to work.  It makes sense to give tax breaks to people with dependents.  And it allows them to attend school, instead of getting a job working for whatever companies are able to exploit them for.

         I'm aware of that, schooling is highly important. It get's a cretin point when you have cut the line on how much money you give them. After three to four children you should not get any more money after that for a extra child. I'm not a 100% sure, but I think the limit you can file is 4 or 5. Which makes sense, cause why should my share of the tax they collect from me go to giving a tax brake to a family that does not know there is such things as condoms and other options of birth control available. Children working is a good thing as well, get a summer and after school job. I had one as a child, it was great having my own money.

(March 15, 2016 at 11:07 pm)KUSA Wrote:

(March 15, 2016 at 10:43 pm)Sterben Wrote: I don't like either of them, she's not very bright and he's a dangerous Psychopath. It makes me really consider not voting and taking my chances. I know it's not the responsible choice to make but it's what I'm really feeling. As much as I hate say this; I'm voting for Hillary since I don't have the money or the skills to be able to run to Canada, but I do have the money to run to Mexico. I don't what be worse, Mexico or living in a country were Trump is president.

If you weren't an entitled socialist you might have more money.

That sentence doesn't even make sense. Entitled suggests that they have been given lots of money.

Not that someone like you even knows what socialism means in practice.

Strange how countries that by American standards are socialist actually have a far greater living standard.

(March 15, 2016 at 11:48 pm)Sterben Wrote:

(March 15, 2016 at 11:34 pm)Kosh Wrote: If you think Trump is running for president to "make America great again", you haven't been paying attention.  Has he specified the era of American greatness he plans to single handedly usher us to?  The Dwight "Ike" Eisenhower years minus segregation and the lack of equal rights might be nice.  Or possibly the Reagan years with it's highly effective "trickle down economics"?

I've never seen so many people so desperate to gobble up such an obvious snowjob.

        He does attract the stupid like a moth to a flame. All that is offered by him is false promises and getting screwed so his friends can get rich off the stupid. There is be many wars caused by this man and the military industrial complex will rake in billions at the cost of more American lives. Your funny as well Kosh about the trickle down economics.Regan was one of the worst presidents ever to be elected, and yet we still can not learn anything from burning our hand on the hot stove.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzuG5Hb9bGE

I've seen bigger "trickles" from a 90 year old man with a prostate the size of a basketball. The super wealthy simply started hoarding their wealth. 

http://www.hugdaily.org/brian-rogel/inco...vings-rate

If you look at any income over the past century, the beginning of the current mess started with Reaganomics.

Even the Muslims are voting for Trump.
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-35758156

(March 15, 2016 at 11:34 pm)Kosh Wrote: If you think Trump is running for president to "make America great again", you haven't been paying attention.  Has he specified the era of American greatness he plans to single handedly usher us to?  The Dwight "Ike" Eisenhower years minus segregation and the lack of equal rights might be nice.  Or possibly the Reagan years with it's highly effective "trickle down economics"?

I've never seen so many people so desperate to gobble up such an obvious snowjob.

Well, you've had 40 years of the GOP screaming "Don't tax the job creators", and 20 years of Farts News scaring the shit out of viewers, and a flooded market of WWE, Jerry Springer, Duck Dynasty and Honey Boo Boo mind rot. Makes it easy for the rich to keep them voting against their own self interests. That quick satisfaction is the bread and butter of the GOP and corporate America.

(March 16, 2016 at 6:28 pm)KUSA Wrote: Even the Muslims are voting for Trump.
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-35758156

I doubt that would be ALL but sure, not impossible, like gays and blacks and women voting against their own self interests.

That is the party of the right wing, the sexist party, the women are baby factories and should obey men party. I doubt any of those Muslims voting for him are for women's rights or gay equality. They probably think like Pat Robertson. But I doubt they represent Malala or our Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison.

A right winger is a right winger, be it a Christian, or Muslim or Jew. Yes those types would vote for him, just like Ann Coulter gets women to vote for that sexist party while saying we should invade Islamic states and force them to to Christianity.