(April 14, 2016 at 3:29 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:

pool the great Wrote:Have you seen the amount of support that this one women got?
These are the kind of women the west is going to be filled with in a few years, Mark my words.

How much support as a percentage of 320 million people?

Insignificant.
My point is the support is growing. More women are thinking that it's the norm for them to give up sex to strangers. I wouldn't mind if they kept this to themselves but they are actually encouraging other women to be like them.

(April 14, 2016 at 12:56 pm)Thena323 Wrote:

(April 14, 2016 at 12:16 pm)pool the great Wrote: "men bad men look me sex for. I hatez Dez. Oh lukz so sexy I me so good meat"

I simply don't see anything wrong with men finding you attractive and expressing an interest you, pool; as long as they respect your boundaries and the law, of course.

And you should never consider yourself a mere piece of meat; All in, lost cause, waste of time...You are ALL of these things. 
Never forget that.

I'm going to show this post to my friends and piss ourselves laughing being a retard comes so natural to you

Nothing wrong with safe and harmless promiscuity.

(April 14, 2016 at 3:33 pm)Jenny A Wrote:

(April 14, 2016 at 12:15 pm)pool the great Wrote: More than 24hrs and that's the best you could come up with?

It has the advantage of truth and brevity.

No it doesn't.
It's impossible for a woman to brag about her sexual prowess. As long as she has a hole *someone* would want to stick a pee pee in there. Can you say the same about a man?
On a sidenote,I'm happy for you that you are raising your daughters right.

(April 14, 2016 at 9:35 pm)Evie Wrote: Nothing wrong with safe and harmless promiscuity.

Absolutely nothing. I have nothing against it.
I however take issue with these women making it a trend. In a few years if they continue doing this young women will be seen as prudes if they don't sleep around. This will peer pressure a lot of young women to sleep around. I take issue with this.

(April 14, 2016 at 2:55 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(April 14, 2016 at 12:15 pm)pool the great Wrote: More than 24hrs and that's the best you could come up with?

Sorry, you and your posts -- and opinion of me, for that matter -- aren't near the top of my priorities ... for obvious reasons. Fact is, on that list as well as this forum, you're pretty much a bottom-dweller.

Hope that helps.

If you're here to criticize my personality rather discuss OP,I'll have you know I have more character flaws than you can imagine and I'm cool with it.

You talk of women as if they're a different species.

Why not just talk of people?

(April 14, 2016 at 9:48 pm)pool the great Wrote:

(April 14, 2016 at 9:35 pm)Evie Wrote: Nothing wrong with safe and harmless promiscuity.

Absolutely nothing. I have nothing against it.
I however take issue with these women making it a trend. In a few years if they continue doing this young women will be seen as prudes if they don't sleep around. This will peer pressure a lot of young women to sleep around. I take issue with this.

See, Pool? If you had posted THIS as the intro to your thread instead of that offensive, dehumanizing 'western women are all sluts' rhetoric, I think you might have been met with a lot less hostility right out of the gates. At least speaking for myself. Providing hypothetical scenarios, addressing issues of morality, and referring to women as individuals with thoughts and feelings (like you just did in post I quoted above) invites actual discussion. Why did you not lead with this?!

(April 14, 2016 at 9:57 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(April 14, 2016 at 9:48 pm)pool the great Wrote: Absolutely nothing. I have nothing against it.
I however take issue with these women making it a trend. In a few years if they continue doing this young women will be seen as prudes if they don't sleep around. This will peer pressure a lot of young women to sleep around. I take issue with this.

See, Pool? If you had posted THIS as the intro to your thread instead of that offensive, dehumanizing 'western women are all sluts' rhetoric, I think you might have been met with a lot less hostility right out of the gates. At least speaking for myself. Providing hypothetical scenarios, addressing issues of morality, and referring to women as individuals with thoughts and feelings (like you just did in post I quoted above) invites actual discussion. Why did you not lead with this?!

I don't have to prove myself to anyone. Also, none asked. Everyone was busy criticizing me and "not all women are like that".

(April 14, 2016 at 9:50 pm)pool the great Wrote:

(April 14, 2016 at 2:55 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Sorry, you and your posts -- and opinion of me, for that matter -- aren't near the top of my priorities ... for obvious reasons. Fact is, on that list as well as this forum, you're pretty much a bottom-dweller.

Hope that helps.

If you're here to criticize my personality rather discuss OP,I'll have you know I have more character flaws than you can imagine and I'm cool with it.

I don't see the point of discussing your OP with you. You're immune to any views that don't comport with your own, unable to grasp that others have support for their views, and you're cloistered inside your own thinking habits, unable to see outside your own closet. I get it. I was young and dumb and full of come once, too

I may as well throw eggs at a brick wall, for all the learning I'd get from such a hypothetical discussion, so therefore I have nothing to say about your views other than that your double-standard speaks for itself.

Also, what kind of stud uses "pee pee" referring to genitalia? I bet you ask women before you kiss them, too.

Keep on with your bragging, kid. I'm sure you've convinced at least one person.

You'll find him in the mirror.