(April 17, 2011 at 3:19 am)Holubice Wrote: Are there in the forum a biologist?

Why do you want to speak to a biologist? To piss him/her off about your end of the world fantasy?

(April 17, 2011 at 3:19 am)Holubice Wrote:

(April 14, 2011 at 4:23 pm)lilphil1989 Wrote: over 9000?

No. If you have a lottery of 90 numbers and you want to win the combination 1,2,3,4,5,6 you have just one possibility over 622.614.630.
Was you good at school also in physic and in biology?

---

Are there in the forum a biologist?

Holodeck, just a heads up.

I know where you're going with this and NO we can't be convinced with the "life is so improbable so there must be a god" argument.

You're not the first to try this lame argument on us and I doubt you'll be the last.

But in order to save you some grief, quit now.

No one cares.

But hey, you will have earned some redemption points with your god(or so you think)

It is just an observation... Does it occur to you (people of this forum/atheists generally) so called xtians and other tribal-cult -adherents consider atheists to have no intellect or education???

mmmm perhaps I'm just getting paranoid.

(April 17, 2011 at 4:01 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: It is just an observation... Does it occur to you (people of this forum/atheists generally) so called xtians and other tribal-cult -adherents consider atheists to have no intellect or education???

mmmm perhaps I'm just getting paranoid.

Nah, you're probably right. I got called stupid by my classmates once because I said I was an atheist, the funny thing is, they do extremely horrible in school. While I do much better than them.
I found this today, probably made by an xtian. (It made me giggle like a little girl.)

I don't know how people can find an invisible magical daddy who went poof and create earth is more plausible than thinking rationally.

(April 17, 2011 at 4:37 am)Jax Wrote: I don't know how people can find an invisible magical daddy who went poof and create earth is more plausible than thinking rationally.

Try neuroscience:

(April 17, 2011 at 4:37 am)Jax Wrote:
I don't know how people can find an invisible magical daddy who went poof and create earth is more plausible than thinking rationally.

.


I want to think rationally. And I want to talk with you about the combinatory computing. So, we have realised that if you have a lottery with 90 numbers and you want to win this numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6) you have just one possibility on 622.614.630. But we are not caring about numbers order, I mean you win also if lottery get numbers in this order: 6, 3, 1, 5, 2, 4. So if you need number will be extract in that special number order, I mean first number extracted '1', than number '2', than number '3', than number '4', than number '5', than number '6' which are possibility? One possibility over?


P.S.
While you ponder and you compute, please have a look at this picture:



And suppose your best friend has invited you to his wedding and in a dinner with 400 hundred guests.





.

(April 18, 2011 at 4:46 am)Holubice Wrote: I want to think rationally.

Then start thinking rationally.

(April 18, 2011 at 4:46 am)Holubice Wrote: And I want to talk with you about the combinatory computing. So, we have realised that if you have a lottery with 90 numbers and you want to win this numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6) you have just one possibility on 622.614.630. But we are not caring about numbers order, I mean you win also if lottery get numbers in this order: 6, 3, 1, 5, 2, 4. So if you need number will be extract in that special number order, I mean first number extracted '1', than number '2', than number '3', than number '4', than number '5', than number '6' which are possibility? One possibility over?

Sigh. I seriously hope you stop badgering people about this.

(April 18, 2011 at 4:46 am)Holubice Wrote: And suppose your best friend has invited you to his wedding and in a dinner with 400 hundred guests.

I'll be quite happy to attend then.

(April 18, 2011 at 5:17 am)Jax Wrote:

(April 18, 2011 at 4:46 am)Holubice Wrote: And I want to talk with you about the combinatory computing. So, we have realised that if you have a lottery with 90 numbers and you want to win this numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6) you have just one possibility on 622.614.630. But we are not caring about numbers order, I mean you win also if lottery get numbers in this order: 6, 3, 1, 5, 2, 4. So if you need number will be extract in that special number order, I mean first number extracted '1', than number '2', than number '3', than number '4', than number '5', than number '6' which are possibility? One possibility over?

Sigh. I seriously hope you stop badgering people about this.

.

Can you compute this combination? And was you good in maths, physic and biology at school?



.

What does combinatory computing have to do with Earthquakes? Or have you changed the subject already? Seriously Holubice you're all over the place.

Completely normal for him. He changes the topic mostly when someone asks him a question he can't answer.

---

(April 18, 2011 at 5:39 am)Holubice Wrote:

(April 18, 2011 at 5:17 am)Jax Wrote:

(April 18, 2011 at 4:46 am)Holubice Wrote: And I want to talk with you about the combinatory computing. So, we have realised that if you have a lottery with 90 numbers and you want to win this numbers (1,2,3,4,5,6) you have just one possibility on 622.614.630. But we are not caring about numbers order, I mean you win also if lottery get numbers in this order: 6, 3, 1, 5, 2, 4. So if you need number will be extract in that special number order, I mean first number extracted '1', than number '2', than number '3', than number '4', than number '5', than number '6' which are possibility? One possibility over?

Sigh. I seriously hope you stop badgering people about this.

.

Can you compute this combination? And was you good in maths, physic and biology at school?



.

May I ask you what is the point of computing this equation? I seriously don't want to waste my time on something as redundant as this.

And also, why do you want to know if I am good at maths, physics and biology?