(June 11, 2016 at 7:34 pm)Aegon Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 7:27 pm)Losty Wrote: Female circumcision is not generally the horror stories you see in the news. It's just a trimming of the labia minora and the clitoral hood.

Why is it ok to mutilate a genitals if you're less likely to royally fuck it up?

Just pointing out that the comparison isn't as simple as you put it. And you ignored my link.

I didn't ignore it. I clicked it. I saw it was the AAP and I already know their stance. I posted it just yesterday along with the stances of pediatrics groups around the world.


I know they're skerred to take away muh freedoms to treat my child like shit. It's why spanking isn't illegal as well. It doesn't change the facts. The facts that even they do not recommend it as it has no significant benefits. Do they outweigh the risks? Probably but having a low risk doesn't make something more moral.

(June 11, 2016 at 7:29 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: I honestly hope everyone advocating circumcision without it being a medical nessecity dont have kids, or social services get involved. You're all supporting child abuse.

Makes me sick to my stomach.

Results of a circumcision:

-A decreased risk of urinary tract infections.
-A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men.
-Protection against penile cancer.
-Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin).
-Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location).
-Having to use the "death grip" when you jerk off

I know I feel so abused!

(June 11, 2016 at 7:40 pm)LastPoet Wrote: What a sad thing to say, almost like a cliche. Go buy some ointment to masturbate, i can do without and my mom taught me to do clean myself. I apologize in advance if you lost your mom early. Yeah that would make me a douchebag. It wouldn't make you reasonable either.

You're trying too hard, darling. <3

(June 11, 2016 at 7:32 pm)LastPoet Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 6:45 pm)Losty Wrote: Not really sure I know what you mean, but I'll try not to have too many opiniony opinions just in case. [emoji14]

To put it bluntly, people will from now on take your input as staff. It kinda limits what you can say, and diminshes (sp?) your freedom. You picked up the bag of salt, you must now carry it. I am not telling what to do, just what you should expect. Be prepared, that is all. You will do fine, just be prepared.

You'll know when things are gettin' surrius in hurr.

Otherwise it's just us.

(June 11, 2016 at 7:43 pm)Aegon Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 7:29 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: I honestly hope everyone advocating circumcision without it being a medical nessecity dont have kids, or social services get involved. You're all supporting child abuse.

Makes me sick to my stomach.

Results of a circumcision:

-A decreased risk of urinary tract infections.
-A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men.
-Protection against penile cancer.
-Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin).
-Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location).
-Having to use the "death grip" when you jerk off

I know I feel so abused!

What is your evidence that there's any true decreased risk? It must be all those millions of dudes in other countries with penis cancer...

I've never read any studies outside of America that agree with most of the things on your list.

(June 11, 2016 at 7:43 pm)Maelstrom Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 7:40 pm)LastPoet Wrote: What a sad thing to say, almost like a cliche. Go buy some ointment to masturbate, i can do without and my mom taught me to do clean myself. I apologize in advance if you lost your mom early. Yeah that would make me a douchebag. It wouldn't make you reasonable either.

You're trying too hard, darling.  <3

Dude, if I ever get romance with a man, that would be Emjay. You are just pityfull. And you would need 3 stiches on your ass. Because hatefuck.

(June 11, 2016 at 7:42 pm)Losty Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 7:34 pm)Aegon Wrote: Just pointing out that the comparison isn't as simple as you put it. And you ignored my link.

I didn't ignore it. I clicked it. I saw it was the AAP and I already know their stance. I posted it just yesterday along with the stances of pediatrics groups around the world.


I know they're skerred to take away muh freedoms to treat my child like shit. It's why spanking isn't illegal as well. It doesn't change the facts. The facts that even they do not recommend it as it has no significant benefits. Do they outweigh the risks? Probably but having a low risk doesn't make something more moral.

All I know is this: not circumcising can lead to numerous health risks over the course of the boy's life, and circumcising will change the way he jerks off. Benefits outweighing risks is the reason anybody ever does anything. There are so many decisions new parents have to make while raising a child. If the upside is the prevention of numerous health risks and a decrease in likelihood of catching certain infections and diseases, and the downside is changing the way he jerks off.... I certainly don't blame anyone for choosing to circumcise.

(June 11, 2016 at 7:55 pm)LastPoet Wrote: And you would need 3 stiches on your ass. Because hatefuck.

Turn me on some more.

(June 11, 2016 at 7:50 pm)Losty Wrote:

(June 11, 2016 at 7:43 pm)Aegon Wrote: Results of a circumcision:

-A decreased risk of urinary tract infections.
-A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men.
-Protection against penile cancer.
-Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin).
-Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location).
-Having to use the "death grip" when you jerk off

I know I feel so abused!

What is your evidence that there's any true decreased risk? It must be all those millions of dudes in other countries with penis cancer...

I've never read any studies outside of America that agree with most of the things on your list.

What's the point in me finding another study if you're just going to disregard any that I post?

Anecdotal, but none of the uncut guys I've been with have ever had 'numerous problems', and they were of various ages so it wasn't like they were all 25 or younger - some were over 40.

Interestingly enough, they all had the biggest dicks of my experience. That had nothing to do with the circumcision. It's just a personal fact I suddenly remembered.