Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 10:41 pm
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2016 at 10:41 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(June 17, 2016 at 10:30 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:24 pm)Maelstrom Wrote: By all means, provide a clarification. My mind is not so sharp.
Truth - the quality or state of being true. Tautology is tautological. Redundant statement is redundant. Useless definition is useless. Nondescript description is nondescript.
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 10:42 pm
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2016 at 10:44 pm by Thomas Kelly252525.)
(June 17, 2016 at 10:41 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:30 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Truth - the quality or state of being true. Tautology is tautological. Redunant statement is redundant. Useless definition is useless. Nondescript description is nondescript.
Do you think you can prove it ?
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 10:45 pm
(June 17, 2016 at 10:38 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:35 pm)Maelstrom Wrote: You haven't provided anything. By all means, try again,
Do you think you can prove I haven't provided anything ?
Do you think that doing so would not be utterly futile?
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 10:47 pm
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2016 at 10:48 pm by Thomas Kelly252525.)
(June 17, 2016 at 10:45 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:38 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Do you think you can prove I haven't provided anything ?
Do you think that doing so would not be utterly futile?
Looks like no to me.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 10:49 pm
(June 17, 2016 at 10:42 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:41 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Tautology is tautological. Redunant statement is redundant. Useless definition is useless. Nondescript description is nondescript.
Do you think you can prove it ?
Do you think that anything else other than it being in fact the actual case would be not logically contradictory and thereby proven by contradiction to be the case by the fact that any alternative leads to aforementioned logical contradiction?
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 10:52 pm
(June 17, 2016 at 10:47 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:45 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Do you think that doing so would not be utterly futile?
Looks like no to me.
Do you think that what it looks like to you has any bearing on objective truth also known as "truth"?
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 10:53 pm
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2016 at 11:00 pm by Thomas Kelly252525.)
(June 17, 2016 at 10:49 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:42 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Do you think you can prove it ?
Do you think that anything else other than it being in fact the actual case would be not logically contradictory and thereby proven by contradiction to be the case by the fact that any alternative leads to aforementioned logical contradiction?
You've not done anything to disprove it, burden of proof.
(June 17, 2016 at 10:52 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:47 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Looks like no to me.
Do you think that what it looks like to you has any bearing on objective truth also known as "truth"?
Do you not think it's true that I posted it ?
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 11:01 pm
(June 17, 2016 at 10:53 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:49 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Do you think that anything else other than it being in fact the actual case would be not logically contradictory and thereby proven by contradiction to be the case by the fact that any alternative leads to aforementioned logical contradiction?
You've not done anything to disprove it, burden of proof.
(June 17, 2016 at 10:52 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Do you think that what it looks like to you has any bearing on objective truth also known as "truth"?
Do you not think it's true that I posted it ? Do you think you have to prove that 2+2=4 or that all bachelors are necessarily unmarried whilst they remain as bachelors?
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Love
June 17, 2016 at 11:05 pm
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2016 at 11:25 pm by Thomas Kelly252525.)
(June 17, 2016 at 11:01 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: (June 17, 2016 at 10:53 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: You've not done anything to disprove it, burden of proof.
Do you not think it's true that I posted it ? Do you think you have to prove that 2+2=4 or that all bachelors are necessarily unmarried whilst they remain as bachelors?
Alasdair Ham,
No. Did you not think something was untrue about what I said ? Why should I do the work if you want to say things are true to me ? No good posting questions like that to me after wanting to prove something true to me.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: Love
June 18, 2016 at 12:26 am
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2016 at 12:27 am by bennyboy.)
I like bacon.
/thread, bitches
|