(May 5, 2011 at 7:08 pm)Chuck Wrote: Evidently. You don't even know you are completely dilusional.

I believe it's spelt "delusional" - as in that famous book by Richard something-or-other. How do your arguments compare to his?

(May 5, 2011 at 7:05 pm)Nimzo Wrote: EDIT: I decided on Sexy Shitwit in the end for nuance.

Before you add that to your delusions, perhaps you should ask someone (presumably of the opposite sex) who is not delusional, whether shitwit is sexy or not.

this Nimrod, nimzo - whatever -
he's trying to come off as whimsical and hap-hazard. His avatar implies a certain playfulness that he does not possess. A blind man under water could see though you nimzo.

So I ask. What do you want?! Cause so far you've said absolutely nothing!

Is he obligated to say anything of value in his own introduction thread, Cinjin? I rather liek him so far.

Welcome aboard, weary traveller...you will get no rest here. But have fun all the same!

(May 5, 2011 at 7:27 pm)Watson Wrote: Is he obligated to say anything of value in his own introduction thread, Cinjin? I rather liek him so far.

Welcome aboard, weary traveller...you will get no rest here. But have fun all the same!

It's spelt "like", Wat, and you like him as fly likes shit.

I'm not sure I'd like to puke all over him and then eat his dissolved remains. Are we possibly projecting a little bit here?

(May 5, 2011 at 7:05 pm)Nimzo Wrote:

(May 5, 2011 at 6:57 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Religious shitwits.

You know the type. They believe everything they read in some stupid old book.

I certainly do - by your standards I am probably one of them. I think I will change my title to "Shitwit" as I rather like it.

EDIT: I decided on Sexy Shitwit in the end for nuance.

That name works for me.

(May 5, 2011 at 7:24 pm)Chuck Wrote: Before you add that to your delusions, perhaps you should ask someone (presumably of the opposite sex) who is not delusional, whether shitwit is sexy or not.

I'd ask my wife, but I have reason to believe she might be biased.

(May 5, 2011 at 7:24 pm)Cinjin Cain Wrote: this Nimrod, nimzo - whatever -
he's trying to come off as whimsical and hap-hazard. His avatar implies a certain playfulness that he does not possess. A blind man under water could see though you nimzo.

Water having that famous opaque quality to it.

(May 5, 2011 at 7:27 pm)Watson Wrote: Is he obligated to say anything of value in his own introduction thread, Cinjin? I rather liek him so far.

Welcome aboard, weary traveller...you will get no rest here. But have fun all the same!

No rest for the wicked, my dear Watson.

(May 5, 2011 at 7:32 pm)Watson Wrote: I'm not sure I'd like to puke all over him and then eat his dissolved remains. Are we possibly projecting a little bit here?

I now understand what "projectile vomiting" is.

(May 5, 2011 at 7:48 pm)Nimzo Wrote: Water having that famous opaque quality to it.

Jesusfuckingchrist, I'll explain the hyperbole for you. He's blind, so regardless, a glass jar or a leather bag on his head wouldn't make a difference in his vision. However blind people have a keener sense of hearing - thus he's UNDER WATER. what a fucking moron! Do you have to walk around with a helmet?

I Kings is listed under your description ... meh, you should put 2 Kings 2:23-24 under your heading. THAT god is far more representative of what you believe.

If you have to explain the joke, it isn't a very funny joke.