I disagree

Ok

What's the basis behind your disagreement?

I neither agree nor disagree. I just don't get what you're saying.

(August 6, 2016 at 12:42 pm)Irrational Wrote: I neither agree nor disagree. I just don't get what you're saying.

Therefore, your understanding is flawed, or the original post is flawed.

I, personally, understand the premise of 'the cohesive human and the cohesive universe communicate'.

Therefore, your understanding is flawed.

(August 6, 2016 at 12:50 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:

(August 6, 2016 at 12:42 pm)Irrational Wrote: I neither agree nor disagree. I just don't get what you're saying.

Therefore, your understanding is flawed, or the original post is flawed.

I, personally, understand the premise of 'the cohesive human and the cohesive universe communicate'.

Therefore, your understanding is flawed.

Yeah, it can't be at all an issue with your post.

I wanna troll this thread so bad, I don't know why, it's a lovely thread.

Omg please don't ban me.

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:

The universe and humanity are equal, their only difference is age.

The human mind can comprehend the universe, as humans are a universal species.

To think, we need a heartbeat; to survive, we need numerous things.

Humanity is an entirety of numerous things, and the universe is an entirety of numerous things.

The cohesive human communicates with the entirety of the universe.

Communication is between the cohesive human and the cohesive universe.

All factors that sum up to the cohesive human communicate.

The heart communicates to the universe, the mind communicates to the universe, and the human communicates to the universe (all other factors included).

Communication is of the numerous factors that sum up to the cohesive human, who communicates as the product of these numerous factors.

First paragraph(to be referred to as p1, p2, from this point forward) is bonkers.

P2, no, not universal, just global. Dude, please.

P3, Lol, what, okay, you poet.

P4, - P3, but fail.

P5, I don't know where this is going...

P6, cohesive? Okay...

P7 No they don't, but give me some of what you're smoking pleaseee....

P8, No comment.

P9, I just... Can't...

(August 6, 2016 at 12:54 pm)Irrational Wrote:

(August 6, 2016 at 12:50 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: Therefore, your understanding is flawed, or the original post is flawed.

I, personally, understand the premise of 'the cohesive human and the cohesive universe communicate'.

Therefore, your understanding is flawed.

Yeah, it can't be at all an issue with your post.

What's the issue with it? 

If there is a noticeable issue, you are able to point it out.

---

(August 6, 2016 at 12:56 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: I wanna troll this thread so bad, I don't know why, it's a lovely thread.

Omg please don't ban me.

(August 6, 2016 at 12:33 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:

The universe and humanity are equal, their only difference is age.

The human mind can comprehend the universe, as humans are a universal species.

To think, we need a heartbeat; to survive, we need numerous things.

Humanity is an entirety of numerous things, and the universe is an entirety of numerous things.

The cohesive human communicates with the entirety of the universe.

Communication is between the cohesive human and the cohesive universe.

All factors that sum up to the cohesive human communicate.

The heart communicates to the universe, the mind communicates to the universe, and the human communicates to the universe (all other factors included).

Communication is of the numerous factors that sum up to the cohesive human, who communicates as the product of these numerous factors.

First paragraph(to be referred to as p1, p2, from this point forward) is bonkers.

P2, no, not universal, just global. Dude, please.

P3, Lol, what, okay, you poet.

P4, - P3, but fail.

P5, I don't know where this is going...

P6, cohesive? Okay...

P7 No they don't, but give me some of what you're smoking pleaseee....

P8, No comment.

P9, I just... Can't...

No comment.

Has someone been using the Deepity Generator again?

This thread is being derailed, but I'm open to discuss or debate with anyone who behaves sensibly.