I'm as confused as I am glad that you're back

I don't think it should be that confusing for staff. Someone shares someone else's private conversation. Nothing is done and supposedly there's no rule to cover this. But apparently it's always been the rule. So...what? Ok that's not confusing at all lol.

Well, yeah. My thoughts exactly. Something doesn't add up.

Thank you for the warm welcomes guys

(October 22, 2016 at 2:19 pm)robvalue Wrote: I'm just gonna not worry about it. I've been so heavily invested in the rules for so long, it's a relief not to have to concern myself anymore.

I got the feeling, most of them cover common human sense anyway. You wouldn't break any of them if you're passing for human in an credible way.

Question for staff. What if I want someone posting my private correspondence with them or don't mind it when they do? What then? Will you ban the person involved anyway, no questions asked? Who would that benefit, exactly?

Rob, this question is especially directed at you, even though you're not staff ATM.

(October 22, 2016 at 3:21 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: Question for staff. What if I want someone posting my private correspondence with them or don't mind it when they do? What then? Will you ban the person involved anyway, no questions asked? Who would that benefit, exactly?

Rob, this question is especially directed at you, even though you're not staff ATM.

The rule only disallows it if it's done without permission.

Apparently Rob doesn't seem to understand this, though. I just want to make sure whether he does, or not.

yea I'm sure that's the problem. >.>

(October 22, 2016 at 3:36 pm)Losty Wrote: yea I'm sure that's the problem. >.>

Um. What?

EP, go drink from the toilet or something. Going half words will get you no were.