Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 9:08 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
#11
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Joker, what is it that you think evolution is ? You seem to enjoy railing against a parody of it, but what do you think evolution actually is?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#12
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously. [...]

Oh, really? Well, if evolution is false, then how come your mother is a monkey? Check mate, theists... Tongue
(nailed it!)
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Reply
#13
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Even assuming the OP isn't a troll, this thread just exposes the binary thinking endemic to the fundie mindset. Even if evolution was completely demolished tomorrow, it would still in no way mean that religion wins by default; no matter how warm and fluffy it makes you feel. The religionist would still have all their work in front of them.

The problem, as I said elsewhere, is that the creationist dogma mill has no system for trapping and correcting errors; meaning that a lie once told gets bounced around and amplified, becoming one of Richard Dawkins' Unsinkable Rubber Ducks (aka PRATT arguments). And make no mistake, Joker, these people have a vested interest in lying to you. Stop being so gullible, for your own sake.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#14
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Evolution disagrees with the OP.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#15
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
I wonder what "scientist" taught joker biology? Ken Ham? LOL!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#16
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Clown college, duh.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
#17
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 7:44 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Even assuming the OP isn't a troll, this thread just exposes the binary thinking endemic to the fundie mindset. Even if evolution was completely demolished tomorrow, it would still in no way mean that religion wins by default; no matter how warm and fluffy it makes you feel.  The religionist would still have all their work in front of them.

The problem, as I said elsewhere, is that the creationist dogma mill has no system for trapping and correcting errors; meaning that a lie once told gets bounced around and amplified, becoming one of Richard Dawkins' Unsinkable Rubber Ducks (aka PRATT arguments). And make no mistake, Joker, these people have a vested interest in lying to you. Stop being so gullible, for your own sake.


Or like that other new member Theological who I respect much more than this joker.  I ask to have a conversation with him but I swear he is convinced that that means parroting tired, retread arguments we've all heard and dismissed any number of times.  It is anti-intellectual to the point of being numbing.
Reply
#18
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously.
Science doesn't care if you believe in it or not.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#19
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Neither creation nor evolution is directly observable, testable, repeatable, or falsifiable.

Well, you're half-right.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#20
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
We created dogs like the Chihuahua and the Great Pyrenees who can no longer reproduce together*, making them functionally separate species. Humans did this, no god needed.


*Picture mating a Smart car and semi-trailer truck.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 10930 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 25405 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 7185 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 640 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 2884 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2660 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 14058 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 180664 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 14669 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1275 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)