If you are interested in other beings, you will like this one:

Quote:"EBE Award Winner! Best Film - International UFO Congress Film Festival. On March 11, 2000, in front of an assembled audience of UFO enthusiasts and the media, evidence was presented that would appear to indicate the existence of, not one, but two types of unknown extraterrestrial life-forms. Labelled 'Phenomena One' and 'Phenomena Two' by a man who spent several years recording and logging thousands of hours of NASA space shuttle transmissions, this "historic" footage and the story that lay behind its discovery can now be revealed"

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000109403

I can't watch this right now as I can't access these kinds of sites from work but, even without looking, this is what I think (and I genuinely don't know which side of the claim you are promoting, if any).

As far as I can he's claiming there are extraterrestrial lifeforms (based on NASA's own footage) yeah? If so, it is almost certainly going to be rubbish for the simple reason that if life had been discovered elsewhere just about every scientist and every scientific publication would be screaming their metaphorical heads off to the highest mountain ... it's what we want, it's what science wants and the fact that they are still trying so hard and still NOT finding anything like this guy is claiming basically causes one to be exceptionally cynical BEFORE you even view it.

Then of course there's the usual gumpf about pictures, films and so on ... with today's ability to edit them how the hell can they genuinely be considered to be evidence?

Kyu

You are very sceptical before the fact.

Yes he is, and I don't blame him. It has the smell of the type of movie that 9/11 truthers make. If there really is evidence of extra terrestrial life, it would be published by now and the media would be all over it.

(April 30, 2009 at 2:48 pm)g-mark Wrote: You are very sceptical before the fact.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Skepticism is a virtue, not a vice.

(April 30, 2009 at 2:48 pm)g-mark Wrote: You are very sceptical before the fact.

Oh fer fuck's sake man ... it's 89 minutes! I'm not even going to bother ... I can't be arsed.

As both Adrian & Leo say it's easy enough to be sceptical, it has all the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory (few if any of which ever come to anything) and, as I said earlier, NASA is about space research and would be shouting from the highest rooftops if they found something so significant.

Kyu

ok, who cares. Very good use of language. Did you know most people are scared of this idea.

(April 30, 2009 at 5:12 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: NASA is about space research and would be shouting from the highest rooftops if they found something so significant.

Especially given the cost of them

(May 1, 2009 at 1:52 am)g-mark Wrote: Did you know most people are scared of this idea.

Well I'm not, neither are people on this forum (I would presume). I don't see how pointing this out adds to the argument at all...

I would love if we would fins intellegent life somewhere. Sometimes you reall which stuff like this where true, but it isnt'.

Why should NASA hide things thing for an istant? It's totally ridiciolous to think that NASA would hide evidence of intellegent life.

As people have said if there was any clear evidence would the media be all over it. Also I don't see why NASA wouldn't publish it when they researching so hard to try to find intellegent life or any life at allt. They are just estatic over the possibilty that theyre might be microbic life on mars.

Why would people of high stature come forward and talk about the subject then? Including astronauts.