(October 13, 2017 at 1:17 am)Godisgood Wrote: As far as when it comes to the Bible, yeah I do {have the actual truth}.

I doubt that very, very much.  Based on some of the things you've posted here you're just parroting things you've picked up from various apologists, without bothering to question what you were told.  If you told me the sun was shining, I'd walk down the hall to a room with a window to see for myself.

You seem to have led an extremely sheltered life, judging from how little you know about other world religions.  I'm also willing to bet good money that if someone sat you and me down in a room and handed us both Genesis 1 in the original Hebrew, I'd be able to read it with decent pronunciation and even translate the first few sentences (because I've actually done it, about 40 years ago), and you wouldn't even know what you were looking at.

(October 13, 2017 at 1:49 am)Tizheruk Wrote: Your whole presence here is a baby game.

I'd rather watch an actual baby.  Much more fun watching them play with things like a set of keys or a cushion with an interesting texture, discovering things and taking in everything they see so excitedly and seemingly non-judgmentally.

(October 13, 2017 at 12:15 am)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 13, 2017 at 12:13 am)Cyberman Wrote: Quelle dommage.

I dont know what that is.

Oh, you're going to love it when they invent Google on your planet.

Let's just say "what a shame" and leave it at that.

Apparently Google is *not* his friend...

An all-powerful agency that actually provides answers? Of course not.

(October 11, 2017 at 8:35 pm)Godisgood Wrote:

(February 19, 2012 at 11:10 pm)Godscreated Wrote: Please show me the contradiction in this psalm, I personally do not see one. Genesis and Psalm are both inspired writings, inspired by God himself.

You say that the bible is the word of god and then ignore the parts that seem contradictory. Simply put, bible is not perfect! How can you then assert Genesis is the true word of God if you think Psalm is not?

Just because there are things in the Bible that seem like they contradict each other, that does not automatically mean they do and it certainty doesn't mean that there isn't an explanation. When two verses seem like they contradict each other, try going to a Christian Website an asking. For example Genesis 1 and Genesis  is often presented as a contradiction. If you go onto Carm.org and go over to the left side there's a section called "Bible Difficulties and it will list difficult verses throughout the entire Bible. If you click on the first one, that says Genesis-Deuteronomy the first one to come up is: "1 & 2, Don't Genesis 1 and 2 present contradictory creation accounts?"

 No, Genesis 2 is a more detailed account of Genesis 1. I'm not even sure what you are eluding to, I posed the question to see if it could be answered because I know there are no contradictions in the Bible. I use several different Bibles to study with and trust God who gave us the Bible over what man might have to say.

GC

The obvious problem being that the "more detailed account" is no less inaccurate.

I think sharing this planet with so many idiots is making me feel very lonely.

(October 13, 2017 at 2:33 am)Godscreated Wrote:

(October 11, 2017 at 8:35 pm)Godisgood Wrote: You say that the bible is the word of god and then ignore the parts that seem contradictory. Simply put, bible is not perfect! How can you then assert Genesis is the true word of God if you think Psalm is not?

Just because there are things in the Bible that seem like they contradict each other, that does not automatically mean they do and it certainty doesn't mean that there isn't an explanation. When two verses seem like they contradict each other, try going to a Christian Website an asking. For example Genesis 1 and Genesis  is often presented as a contradiction. If you go onto Carm.org and go over to the left side there's a section called "Bible Difficulties and it will list difficult verses throughout the entire Bible. If you click on the first one, that says Genesis-Deuteronomy the first one to come up is: "1 & 2, Don't Genesis 1 and 2 present contradictory creation accounts?"

 No, Genesis 2 is a more detailed account of Genesis 1. I'm not even sure what you are eluding to, I posed the question to see if it could be answered because I know there are no contradictions in the Bible. I use several different Bibles to study with and trust God who gave us the Bible over what man might have to say.

GC

Of course.  Because a contradiction isn't a contradiction if you believe it isn't.

---

(October 11, 2017 at 10:10 pm)Godisgood Wrote: Just type into Google this: If God knew that Adam and Eve would sin, why did He create them?

FYI I'm about to leave for dinner in about minutes.

---

You'reoure referring to Genesis 67:6, right? That verse has an explanation!!

---

(October 11, 2017 at 10:08 pm)Khemikal Wrote: God wasn't sorry for flooding the earth, he was sorry for having ever made man......what with them being horrible pieces of shit and all.  Air tight case for genocide.

Not that it matters much, since it never happened.

what with them being horrible pieces of shit and all. Air tight case for genocide.


Yeah He may have committed it but it was Just!

Considering you even acknowledged yourself that they were wicked, that makes for an even stronger case that He was Just.

So "just" as far as god goes, is different than our definition of it?

---

(October 12, 2017 at 11:56 pm)Godisgood Wrote: How do you know that there isn't an incentive? Of course, there's evidence for my God!!! And when you say other gods, which gods are you talking about? Allah is one example.

---

Nope.  Not one bit of testable, objective evidence. You act like a child.

---

(October 12, 2017 at 11:56 pm)Godisgood Wrote: You could have studied it for 53 years and still be wrong!!

---

But, of course, you can't be wrong.

---

(October 13, 2017 at 12:07 am)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 13, 2017 at 12:03 am)Minimalist Wrote: Indeed.  Almost as if he has the mind of a primitive goat fucker with a tiny dick.

Indeed.  Almost as if he has the mind of a primitive goat fucker with a tiny dick. 

Yeah thats extremely immature and flat out stupid. It shocking to me that one of the rules isn't against cussing.

Fuck off, God-boy.  Your blathering, showing a total lack of critical thinking skills, is more repulsive to me than any word you can dream up.  The immaturity and stupidity is teeming in your own posts.

---

(October 13, 2017 at 12:16 am)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 13, 2017 at 12:15 am)Godisgood Wrote: I dont know what that is.

---

Never mind.

Fine, then. Be a jerk. Do you want to have an actual conversation now or would U prefer to continue to be immature?

Why?  You can't be wrong, so what's the point?  Do you think you have some knowledge that will turn us all toward your god?  I'll accept the existance of your god when shown objective, verifiable evidence.

What would it take for you to change your mind?

Yeah, just what I thought.

---

(October 13, 2017 at 12:23 am)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 13, 2017 at 12:22 am)Minimalist Wrote: Fuck you.  You are incapable of any sort of reasonable conversation.  If you believe in fucking miracles, you are a jerk.  Period.

Call me when you grow up.

What are you talking about? I havent said anything about miracles.

---

So you don't believe in miracles?

---

(October 13, 2017 at 12:29 am)Khemikal Wrote:

(October 13, 2017 at 12:23 am)Godisgood Wrote: Whats more of a miracle is for Atheist to try and explain the existence of the universe, morality, the origin of life, without God, and expect it to somehow make sense. Thats what a miracle.

.....................?

More or less miraculous than you doing so -with- god?  Care to take a crack at that?  Can you explain to me the existence of the universe, morality, and the origin of life?

So, you don't even know what the definition of "miracle" is?

(October 12, 2017 at 9:03 pm)Godisgood Wrote: But its an opinion based on current evidence. 
Im sorry Im not following you. What is  an opinion that is based on current evidence?

Well there was a time when people thought that that there were dog headed people living in india. That was their opinion based on rumours by people who had allegedly "witnessed" these imaginary beings, but as we know witness testimony is notoriously unreliable and what happened was that people actually went to india and found that there were in fact no dog headed people there, so their opinion changed to no longer believing in dog heads. It was an opinion that had changed due to new information.

People used to think that radiation was good for you when it was first discovered because energy=good for you and they sold irradiated water and food to give you vitality. That was their "opinion" but it changed when it was discovered that it was immensely bad for you.

I could go on if you like I have like a hundred examples of this.