Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 6:54 pm
Thread Rating:
Street Epistemology - Practice
|
RE: Street Epistemology - Practice
November 21, 2017 at 7:05 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2017 at 7:05 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
Some people can't help being philosophy sluts?
Huh? Philosophy is great. It's religion that sucks ass. (November 21, 2017 at 6:26 pm)curiosne Wrote:(November 21, 2017 at 2:05 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Anything that gives me reason to believe or not believe would be evidence. So yes, I would agree with your examples as evidence. Because of the format, you may want to ask more than one question at a time, if it doesn't mess up the flow of your presentation. You ask good questions; feelings, I waver on. I think that they can be evidence, but as support only and in addition to other evidence. A logical argument, or reason, I could see where it could technically be counted as evidence, but I would normally separate them, with evidence being a part of ones reasons.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther (November 21, 2017 at 10:14 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(November 21, 2017 at 6:26 pm)curiosne Wrote: No, my goal is trying to understand how you determine what is true of life and also what is true of reality. Let me know if this is getting too long winded and I'll try to close off my questions quickly...I'm new to this so my line of questioning might not be very succinct (apologies in advance). Good point, I'll try to limit the amount of questions I ask in one go. So let's get logical question out of the way first....so are you saying that with a logical argument, you'd only accept that it represents reality if it's both sound and also that there's evidence that the argument is true. Have I summed up your position on this correctly? RE: Street Epistemology - Practice
November 22, 2017 at 7:01 am
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2017 at 7:17 am by RoadRunner79.)
(November 22, 2017 at 1:32 am)curiosne Wrote:(November 21, 2017 at 10:14 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Because of the format, you may want to ask more than one question at a time, if it doesn't mess up the flow of your presentation. Actually I was talking about increasing the questions in one post. If it won’t interrupt the flow of you approach. I can understand wanting to build a flow of logic. As to your question. No, while it’s going to be dependent on the particulars of the the claim/argument, I wouldn’t agree that physical evidence is always necessary, to bolster the reasons. Would you say that you have a lower view of logic in this way?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther RE: Street Epistemology - Practice
November 22, 2017 at 5:13 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2017 at 5:15 pm by curiosne.)
(November 22, 2017 at 7:01 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(November 22, 2017 at 1:32 am)curiosne Wrote: Good point, I'll try to limit the amount of questions I ask in one go. No, it's not a lower view of logic but I think I understand where you're coming from. I'll approach this question in a different way then... Do you believe that the Sasquatch (ie bigfoot) exists? If you do / not, what are your reasons for / not believing in it's existence? Also when you say "feelings, I waver on. I think that they can be evidence, but as support only and in addition to other evidence", are you implying that feelings are a lower quality / form of evidence hence you why you'd only accept it as a support as opposed to it being a stand alone form of evidence? RE: Street Epistemology - Practice
November 22, 2017 at 5:45 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2017 at 5:46 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
If I may interject . . .
. . . I would love anyone to give an example of what non-physical evidence of anything could even conceivably be in principle without being a self-contradictory concept. Doesn't the concept of evidence, by its very nature, presuppose something that can at least in principle be evident to us, and aren't we physical beings, and can't evidence only be evident to physical beings . . . physically? RE: Street Epistemology - Practice
November 22, 2017 at 5:53 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2017 at 5:54 pm by curiosne.)
(November 21, 2017 at 10:14 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(November 21, 2017 at 6:26 pm)curiosne Wrote: No, my goal is trying to understand how you determine what is true of life and also what is true of reality. Let me know if this is getting too long winded and I'll try to close off my questions quickly...I'm new to this so my line of questioning might not be very succinct (apologies in advance). (November 22, 2017 at 5:45 pm)Hammy Wrote: If I may interject . . . I think it's all in the wording of it. Going back to one of my examples where I claim that I have $10 in my pocket, you would accept my claim (even without physical proof) that I actually have $10 in my pocket. Reason being that it's a mundane claim and hence you would not go to that extra step of searching me for the $10...ie me telling you that I only have $10 in money is sufficient for you to believe me. I'm trying not to get tied up in semantics currently as my claim above is not really evidence, it's just a claim but one that you'd ordinarily accept. (November 22, 2017 at 5:53 pm)curiosne Wrote: I think it's all in the wording of it. Going back to one of my examples where I claim that I have $10 in my pocket, you would accept my claim (even without physical proof) that I actually have $10 in my pocket. Reason being that it's a mundane claim and hence you would not go to that extra step of searching me for the $10...ie me telling you that I only have $10 in money is sufficient for you to believe me. But I would accept your claim for a reason and that reason is itself physical. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
street epistemology | drfuzzy | 138 | 27898 |
December 26, 2015 at 3:56 pm Last Post: Delicate |
|
Crazy atheists freaking out at street preachers | ksona | 13 | 3521 |
May 27, 2014 at 3:05 pm Last Post: JesusHChrist |
|
Street Epistemology / Dr Peter Boghossian / A Manual For Creating Atheists | mralstoner | 0 | 1774 |
July 1, 2013 at 2:49 am Last Post: mralstoner |
|
Religion New York Atheists Angry Over 'Heaven' Street Sign Honoring Sept. 11 Victims? | MilesTailsPrower | 4 | 3204 |
June 23, 2011 at 11:24 am Last Post: Anymouse |
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)