*cough* repression *cough*

(November 25, 2017 at 6:46 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: I was the first to vote in the poll, but didn't comment.

Straight.

I always suspected you were weird like that....





(I'm straight too.... straight to Roula the goat! )

She's so vanilla!



* Edwardo Piet runs off

(November 26, 2017 at 2:35 am)ignoramus Wrote:

(November 25, 2017 at 6:46 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: I was the first to vote in the poll, but didn't comment.

Straight.

I always suspected you were weird like that....





(I'm straight too.... straight to Roula the goat! )

Can't catch a camel?

I can't reach!

fell off the ladder once ... how embarrass!

(November 26, 2017 at 12:31 am)Succubus Wrote:

(November 26, 2017 at 12:14 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: You are strange...

Says the woman who eats flesh and drinks blood.

Oh yess!!

---

(November 25, 2017 at 11:44 pm)energizer bunny Wrote: Catholic_Lady and LadyforCamus would you please leave poor Succubus alone and stop trollin this thread.

Lol. Ok, ok.... I'll try not to be such a bully from now on.

(November 25, 2017 at 10:33 am)mlmooney89 Wrote: Thena have you spoken to CL at all outside this thread? Do you know her personality at all? It kinda feels like you don't and you just walked in this thread and came to your own conclusions. Now I'm not saying I know CL in real life but after being friends with her on FB and chatting with her here on this site it's pretty obvious that she isn't playing these games you accuse her of. Your insistence that she is and saying we are pretty much blind to her actions does come off as quite rude.

I think you'd do better to re-examine the OP and ask more questions of CL, to be honest. She stated it seemed to her that "a lot" of atheist females are bisexual; so many in fact, that it leaves her guessing that it may very well exceed percentages present within the general population. Then she requests that asks that forum members explain the presence of rampant bisexuality on this site; After her proposition is shown to be correct and her poll produces results the anticipated results, of course.

She then, without being asked, offers her reasons as to why she wants to know all of this, which amounts to: 
No reason, really. 
Duh....curiosity? Tee-hee. I dunno, gang.

Certainly not to bolster any pre-conceived notions/presuppositions she has in regards to atheism or what she considers to be unnatural/ungodly behavior, though. Because CL would never do what she's been known to do a multitude of times on this forum.

Apparently it's easy enough for you and and several others to accept the cheerful assertion that she has (or had) no earthly clue as to why this was important/relevant enough for her to form a premise, conduct a poll AND request explanations to her questions she posited. Great. That's fine. 
But I don't. 
She's a reasonably intelligent adult of sound mind, and I have every reason to believe that she does indeed understand her own motivations for asking questions and attempting to acquire specific knowledge. That, along with my own prior interactions and observations in regards to CL, leads me to believe to that the OP was indeed laden with pretense. Whether or not you chat up CL on Facebook has no bearing on that matter, as far I'm concerned.

You find my position to be rude? So what? I find the backhanded insinuations, feigned ignorance, and utter insincerity that colors much of her posting to be "rude" as well, but I manage to live with it. 
So I imagine you'll be okay, too. 

Hope that answers your questions.

Thena, I meant no insult or condescension with this thread. I was curious about an observation I made (that a couple others have also said they noticed/are curious about) and opened up a thread because I was bored. Nothing more, nothing less, and you are honestly putting way too much thought into this.

If you dont think it's anyone's business and dont want to participate on the poll, thats fair enough - dont. Its a personal question and the invitation to answer is just that - an invotation. No one is forcing you.

I see that you, again on this post, say that i have "multiple times" supposedly made threads/posts where a draw parallels between atheism and "behaviors I find immoral." I asked you already to please show me where I've done that, and you didnt. You just came back on here and accused me of it again without providing examples to back up your claim about me.

Anyway, I can't sit here and tell you that you're wrong about my intentions for this thread. You've already made up your mind what my intention is (despite me telling you it isnt) and are trying to convince others of it. Clearly you will continue to think what you want to think.

Person A: Your intention is to insult us!
Peraon B: No, actually I mean no insult at all...
Person A: Yes you do!!!!
Person B: Ok then.

For a long time I confused the  need for intimacy, friendship and companionship with sex drive. I think because I didn't actually ever have a sex drive so didn't know that there was a difference. Men automatically assume that if you are disinterested in sex then it is because you are not doing it right. Yeah I like cuddles, but given a choice  there are many other things that I'd prefer to be doing than sex. It also got confusing because I know what it is like to be turned on. When I had a lot of repressions these came out as kinks that I could not satisfy but when working through the repression I lost the kink. But it was never about having sex with other people.

Put it like this. Imagine if almost everybody in society was really into vigorously rubbing their elbows or blowing air onto their eyeballs, and expected you to enjoy it as well. Then when you don't people say that there's something wrong with you. I mention the elbow because that's like normal sex when no one is trying to stimulate me. It's just an arbitrary part of the body. I mention the eyeball because that's what it feels like to me when someone does try to physically stimulate me. It just becomes more irritating. And then people tell you that you aren't rubbing your elbow properly, and you should blow air onto your eyeball. Then you'll enjoy it like them. And if you still don't then they tell you that you must be repressed. No, I know what repressions are like and they at least give me kinks that I could enjoy.

Yes hormones have an effect. You get more pleasure from satisfying a bigger hunger. This is the same for food, sex, water, drugs etc. But no amount of hormones is going to make me want to rub my elbow or blow air onto my eyeball.

I still want a companion though. I still want to share my life with someone. I still want friends. I can still find men and women aesthetically attractive.

(November 25, 2017 at 11:52 pm)Succubus Wrote:

(November 25, 2017 at 1:45 pm)Losty Wrote: I don’t get it

Pleeese don't make me go through that horror of a quote function again!

The OP is ostensibly, about two scantily clad women illuminated by Body Shop ™ Scented candles, and listening to Sigur Rós. Their soft, lengthy, recently shaved, silken smooth (Tea tree oil) warm thighs just happen to commingle when one reaches over the other for the wine/spliff.

And 'you' said; "I'll do it if you won't me too". Err, or something to that effect.

Your words woman! You proposed that in these times there'll be a  great rubbing of clams!



Hate? Most certainly not. A good sideways look, most definitely.

The title of this OP is literally: a question for the ladies of AF.  So, if you have a penis, keep in mind you weren't even technically invited into this conversation to begin with.  If a man can't help but click on this thread title with his raging hard-on; if he can't participate in an adult discussion about the fluidity of female sexually without being reduced to a pile of cum and tears; without defaulting to the tasteless and cliche fantasies he's jerked off to a thousand times while trying to watch Skinamax through the squiggly lines on his mom's TV; that is certainly no fault of CL's, and it speaks exactly nothing to her motives.  Might all of this animosity have something to do with the fact that she's an attractive, young woman?  If CL was the spitting image of John C. Riley but with more weight and less hair, would you still be charging her with attention-seeking motives?  

Ya'll need to grow up.