Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 9, 2024, 6:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Listen, I'm just trying to tell you that your intentions aren't plain in this medium. A kudos can mean agreement, laughter, "i read this", a lot of different things. Expecting anyone to suss these things out when you're being vague in a text-only format is just unreasonable, as is expecting them to differentiate between a joking insult and an insult laid in seriousness, which we had just been doing.

Please note, nothing in this reply is flaming. [Image: 2dm8n01.jpg]

RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
I hope the both of you understand that you both have the same individual issues with others. I've been a recipient also. 

You can do with that what you want.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(January 1, 2018 at 1:32 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I hope the both of you understand that you both have the same individual issues with others. I've been a recipient also. 

You can do with that what you want.

I do not have this same issue with anyone else. Disagreements you and I have had managed to stay within one thread instead of spanning months and more than a handful of threads, correct? The only other person I have had similar disagreements with since my return to this forum has been his girlfriend. I'm sure you can figure out why that is, though I can't remember which one of them I pissed off to start this. I know that I have an abrasive sense of humor, and I know I can be dismissive of other people, don't mind flinging insults, etc. People who have bothered to get to know me have become my friends. Those who haven't, I don't care enough about to apologize for who I am. I'm certainly not even the meanest bitch in here. I just stand out because people seem to think my relationship with Tibs makes me fair game for all of the staff griping that goes on here. It's not happening anymore. I'm only going to bother with people who can take a disagreement and remain amiable in the aftermath.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(January 1, 2018 at 12:32 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Listen, I'm just trying to tell you that your intentions aren't plain in this medium. A kudos can mean agreement, laughter, "i read this", a lot of different things. Expecting anyone to suss these things out when you're being vague in a text-only format is just unreasonable, as is expecting them to differentiate between a joking insult and an insult laid in seriousness, which we had just been doing.

Please note, nothing in this reply is flaming. [Image: 2dm8n01.jpg]

If a kudos meant "I read this" I need to kudos way more.

Also, she told you she was joking like 4 times. Nobody is expecting you to suss these things out when they are flat out telling you they are joking. It's fine if you don't get the joke the first time around, but she literally pointed it out, and the fact that she gave you kudos to the post is a big hint as well. I don't know anyone who goes around giving kudos to people they are planning on insulting in the very next post. That's not the point of a kudos at all.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(January 1, 2018 at 2:10 pm)Tiberius Wrote: If a kudos meant "I read this" I need to kudos way more.

Well one thing is certain: you do need to kudos way more Tongue

But yeah, I think it was rather clear that Shell B was joking, to be honest. I get it that Thump maybe isn't very good with dealing with banter from non-friends though. I guess that's what this is about.

For what it's worth I like all parties involved and I wish things would stop getting personal. I still don't understand why people got thread banned for a couple of insults. Seems to have just created an unnecessary drama out of nothing. And I still stand by my statements that this place is going to eventually turn into a safe space and echo chamber if the prime directive gets enforced this loosely. I guess we did eventually get the nuke button and we called it the "prime directive" and aimed it at AF? Tongue
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(January 1, 2018 at 11:46 am)Shell B Wrote: When you see me in the forum, do not respond to me. I will treat every response from you as continued flaming and report it in the interest of preventing more of this nonsense. I will not respond. Goodbye, Trumpalump.

Wow. Such confidence.

Reporting every response, regardless of whether it were inflammatory or not, would most certainly constitute Abuse of the Reporting System. And be deemed worthy of action.
For anyone else, at least.

I guess the Ignore Button's just for plebs.

*highlighting mine, for emphasis
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Can we have a little less backseat moderating, please? I think I know my colleagues enough to assume that they've managed to get a grasp on the job by now, however tenuous, and are fairly likely to respond to such things in the appropriate manner. I have not the slightest idea what their opinions are of me.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(January 1, 2018 at 4:59 pm)Hammy Wrote:
(January 1, 2018 at 2:10 pm)Tiberius Wrote: If a kudos meant "I read this" I need to kudos way more.

Well one thing is certain: you do need to kudos way more Tongue

But yeah, I think it was rather clear that Shell B was joking, to be honest. I get it that Thump maybe isn't very good with dealing with banter from non-friends though. I guess that's what this is about.

For what it's worth I like all parties involved and I wish things would stop getting personal. I still don't understand why people got thread banned for a couple of insults. Seems to have just created an unnecessary drama out of nothing. And I still stand by my statements that this place is going to eventually turn into a safe space and echo chamber if the prime directive gets enforced this loosely. I guess we did eventually get the nuke button and we called it the "prime directive" and aimed it at AF? Tongue

The drama was happening well before the PD rule was enforced. I stand by the fact that I think it was for the best. In the future, I'll try to do better with derailing threads (I think I was better at it when I was on staff.) However, I didn't do well in that thread, and it was completely derailed as a result.

(January 1, 2018 at 5:41 pm)Thena323 Wrote:
(January 1, 2018 at 11:46 am)Shell B Wrote: When you see me in the forum, do not respond to me. I will treat every response from you as continued flaming and report it in the interest of preventing more of this nonsense. I will not respond. Goodbye, Trumpalump.

Wow. Such confidence.

Reporting every response, regardless of whether it were inflammatory or not, would most certainly constitute Abuse of the Reporting System. And be deemed worthy of action.
For anyone else, at least.

I guess the Ignore Button's just for plebs.

*highlighting mine, for emphasis

Hey, look who it is and the tired old arguments about me being treated specially that she's bringing up. I meant to clarify earlier, and I will do it now. Every response directed at me that is insulting and intended to flame will be reported. Others will simply be ignored. I'm going to extend that to you too, since you can't seem to shut the fuck up. Tibs already pointed out to me that it would be abuse of the reporting system. I wonder why he would do that if I would just get away with it anyway . . . Curious . . . I will be sure when I report those comments to mention the flame war that started with you two months ago. Hopefully, you'll just cut the shit and ignore me as I intend to ignore you after this post.

I'd use the ignore button, but then Thing 1 and Thing 2 (that's you) would still be able to see my posts, which isn't ideal for me. Lucky for both of us, I'm able to ignore both of you without the help of a forum function, and I can keep you from continuing to flame me by reporting any abuse of the rules, so that's that. Toodles.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(January 1, 2018 at 6:05 pm)Shell B Wrote: Hey, look who it is and the tired old arguments about me being treated specially that she's bringing up. I meant to clarify earlier, and I will do it now. Every response directed at me that is insulting and intended to flame will be reported. Others will simply be ignored. I'm going to extend that to you too, since you can't seem to shut the fuck up. Tibs already pointed out to me that it would be abuse of the reporting system. I wonder why he would do that if I would just get away with it anyway . . . Curious . . . I will be sure when I report those comments to mention the flame war that started with you two months ago. Hopefully, you'll just cut the shit and ignore me as I intend to ignore you after this post.

I'd use the ignore button, but then Thing 1 and Thing 2 (that's you) would still be able to see my posts, which isn't ideal for me. Lucky for both of us, I'm able to ignore both of you without the help of a forum function, and I can keep you from continuing to flame me by reporting any abuse of the rules, so that's that. Toodles.

LOL...Keep playing the victim, dear. Enough people see you for what you are, now. 

And presumably enough of them won't feel as though they have to sit and suffer your inexcusably despicable behavior in silence in order to enjoy this forum and the folks they've met here. 
That's good enough for me. 

My work is done. Angel 
 
Ta!
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
I don't think anyone here is being despicable.

Maybe me, a little Tongue

I haz unpopular opinion! Hence I is dick!



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  i keep getting contradictory messages from staff rocinantexyz 12 2557 November 29, 2022 at 4:37 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Dear Staff Foxaèr 28 4286 February 5, 2019 at 8:12 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  What Does This Mean, Oh Staff? Minimalist 24 5702 July 15, 2017 at 1:35 am
Last Post: c172
  Staff Appreciation Thread Shell B 41 8198 December 4, 2016 at 3:21 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  blocking ex staff members Catholic_Lady 68 6675 November 17, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  [split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues pocaracas 283 32732 July 11, 2016 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Unable to log in to my account Mermaid 42 6167 March 30, 2016 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Thumbs Up Kudos for such Great forums!! Orchids 24 6168 September 22, 2015 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: Losty
  Blueberry muffins and birthdays and other such things. Losty 13 4330 May 16, 2015 at 4:15 pm
Last Post: Dystopia
  Staff....Once The Strike Ends...Strange Error Message Minimalist 1 2049 April 5, 2015 at 6:13 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)