Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 6:38 am
Atheist Forums › Discussion › News & Current Affairs v
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
A Theist Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Backslid Pentecostal Christian and Forum Agitator
Posts: 3522
Threads: 165
Joined: November 17, 2009
Reputation: 27
#1
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 10:47 am (This post was last modified: June 4, 2018 at 10:55 am by A Theist.)
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado Baker who refused to sell a wedding cake to a same sex couple...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...052989001/

EDIT: just heard on the news that the SCOTUS decision was actually a 7 - 2 vote with Ginsberg and Sotomayor dissenting.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Find
Reply
Silver Offline Donators
Previous username: Foxaèr
Faith's Nightmare
*****
Religious Views: Infidel Savant
Posts: 32746
Threads: 1408
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation: 152
#2
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 11:05 am
At least I know to boycott that baker. Wink
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Find
Reply
Brian37 Offline
RationalPoet
*****
Religious Views: JGH 1933-2017 RIP MOM
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation: 71
#3
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 11:10 am
(June 4, 2018 at 10:47 am)A Theist Wrote: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado Baker who refused to sell a wedding cake to a same sex couple...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...052989001/

EDIT: just heard on the news that the SCOTUS decision was actually a 7 - 2 vote with Ginsberg and Sotomayor dissenting.

And the backslide continues. 

Fine, if all laws are equal, then the sane should refuse service to right wing asshole bigots.
Poetry by Brian37(poems by an atheist) Also on Facebook as BrianJames Rational Poet and Twitter Brianrrs37  I also have a new blog here at https://www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
Find
Reply
Whateverist Away Donators
Known religious sympathizer/accomodationist
*****
Religious Views: Be civil or die!
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation: 151
#4
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 11:28 am
(June 4, 2018 at 10:47 am)A Theist Wrote: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado Baker who refused to sell a wedding cake to a same sex couple...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...052989001/

EDIT: just heard on the news that the SCOTUS decision was actually a 7 - 2 vote with Ginsberg and Sotomayor dissenting.


Yep, definitely need more women on that court.
Find
Reply
Tiberius Offline
Question Everything.
*******
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation: 143
#5
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 11:30 am (This post was last modified: June 4, 2018 at 11:33 am by Tiberius.)
Apparently the ruling was more about the treatment of the baker by the courts rather than actual discrimination. SCOTUS didn’t think Colorado gave him a fair trial, which is why the decision was 7-2 and not 5-4. Their decision actually had little to do with gay rights or selling a cake, it seems:

Quote:Kagan's concurring opinion is helpful for what it suggests the court's holding is: Colorado can protect gay people, and therefore "can treat a baker who discriminates based on sexual orientation differently from a baker who does not" -- but only if the state's decisions "are not infected by religious hostility or bias."
Find
Reply
I_am_not_mafia Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Gnostic atheist
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation: 88
#6
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 11:34 am
Shock news! Supreme court full of Abrahamic theists in a proto-theocracy rule in favour of a religionist who wants to discriminate against a minority.
Find
Reply
Amarok Offline
The Unseen
*****
Religious Views: Non believer
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation: 43
#7
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 7:07 pm
Yup a dark day for progress in society and a preservation irrational bigotry .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Find
Reply
Minimalist Offline Donators
Go Blow Jesus Out Your Ass
*****
Religious Views: Fuck It
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation: 259
#8
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 7:19 pm
Quote:but only if the state's decisions "are not infected by religious hostility or bias."

While that is a correct interpretation of the actual decision I am left wondering how a state's decisions on issues which are inherently infected by religious hostility and bias can help but address such hostility or bias?
Find
Reply
Amarok Offline
The Unseen
*****
Religious Views: Non believer
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation: 43
#9
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 7:36 pm
(June 4, 2018 at 11:30 am)Tiberius Wrote: Apparently the ruling was more about the treatment of the baker by the courts rather than actual discrimination. SCOTUS didn’t think Colorado gave him a fair trial, which is why the decision was 7-2 and not 5-4. Their decision actually had little to do with gay rights or selling a cake, it seems:

Quote:Kagan's concurring opinion is helpful for what it suggests the court's holding is: Colorado can protect gay people, and therefore "can treat a baker who discriminates based on sexual orientation differently from a baker who does not" -- but only if the state's decisions "are not infected by religious hostility or bias."
Which means the broader question has yet to be answered
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Find
Reply
Wyrd of Gawd Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation: 15
#10
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
June 4, 2018 at 8:20 pm
Now the bigots are free to post at least one of their favorite signs =
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
No Gays Allowed: The Rebirth of Jim Crow and Segregation

https://phoenixjustice.blogspot.com
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › News & Current Affairs v
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1224 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 23627 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 372 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 3584 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 547 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1142 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 1540 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 25810 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1366 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 11016 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)