Ontological Disproof of God

[Abaddon_ire]

Magic hateball says yes, definitely. 

Forum deadweight, likely to suffer a culling.

---

Magic hateball says yes, definitely. 

Forum deadweight, likely to suffer a culling.

Actually, when I rocked up here, I was slightly annoyed that I was regarded with suspicion. 

Now I know why that was.

---

Nobody can make head nor tail of it and we are mostly atheists here anyway.




 

Nobody can make head nor tail of it
Jormungandr completely, totally, absolutely understood, all on her very own, the simple, simple, radically simple logical progression of, and the meaning of the disproof, and, reported that understanding to us.  She took the time to concentrate on what she was facing in the text, and came out a winner! 

Abaddon, a whole bunch of the time you have your facts mixed-up. Although I cannot possibly thank you enough for showing such concern for my situation here, wow, thank you!  Negatio.

You have intentionally munged my words with Jorgs. Fuck off.

[negatio]

Whateverist, what does QFT mean? Negatio

Fucking christ on a unicycle.

Let me once again google that for you.

Are you really this bone ass lazy?

The last thing I am is lazy. Perhaps I am so busy elsewhere that a cryptic indeterminate designation for something, when the author will not respond with the requested answer, soon fades into ground, as in background, losing itself as figure.  Now, did you know that the very first writers made their living making literary portraits of  rich patrons. I do believe it high-time you had your portrait written, and, since you have failed to re-write Duane over into your preferred being for him, perhaps you may permit Duane to write your portrait, fragmentarily, of course, bit by bit, I would conjecture and conjure what I see when I imagine what and where you are? Okay? Negatio.

[Silver]

[The Grand Nudger]

If a third person personality takes a piss, does that make it's owner a peeping tom?

[Abaddon_ire]

Fucking christ on a unicycle.

Let me once again google that for you.

Are you really this bone ass lazy?

The last thing I am is lazy.

You are demonstrably lazy. Stop with the lies.

Perhaps I am so busy elsewhere that a cryptic indeterminate designation for something,

I am busy fucking everywhere, doesnt stop me, but oddly stops you from any attempt at rationality

when the author will not respond with the requested answer,

That is a fucking outrageous slur. You should retract it without delay.  You are yourself an author who responds to nothing at all.

soon fades into ground, as in background, losing itself as figure.

Aww poor you. Not.

  Now, did you know that the very first writers made their living making literary portraits of  rich patrons. I do believe it high-time you had your portrait written, and, since you have failed to re-write Duane over into your preferred being for him, perhaps you may permit Duane to write your portrait,

Positing whatever is in your head in the third person is a hallmark of abject nuttery.

fragmentarily, of course, bit by bit, I would conjecture and conjure what I see when I imagine what and where you are? Okay? Negatio.

No. Not Ok.

[negatio]

I am now asking for your honest opinion: Am I coding correctly now?

[quote-''Vulcanlogician'']

No, you’re still adding in extra tags for no reason.
[/quote]


Pardon me if I immediately fail, once again, to understand. You are saying that there is still something extra in what I am writing...the formula is so very tiny as it is now, what on earth is extra there?!  What extra tags, plural; there are only two tags:

and

  I am very very tired at the moment, and even the box we are in together, now, appears abnormal, because your response in now showing in the box wherein I am supposed to type my response to you?!  Oh, we must now be in source mode, which I really wish to stay in at all times, but cannot see how to...Negatio

[Losty]

Any reply to your post is going to be messed up because you messed it up to begin with.

Go back and look at your post that I quoted and you can see easily that it has an extra tag in it just by looking at it.

Also, why are you calling Khem a cracker? Are you a racist?

[negatio]

The last thing I am is lazy.

You are demonstrably lazy. Stop with the lies.

Perhaps I am so busy elsewhere that a cryptic indeterminate designation for something,

I am busy fucking everywhere, doesnt stop me, but oddly stops you from any attempt at rationality

when the author will not respond with the requested answer,

That is a fucking outrageous slur. You should retract it without delay.  You are yourself an author who responds to nothing at all.

soon fades into ground, as in background, losing itself as figure.

Aww poor you. Not.

  Now, did you know that the very first writers made their living making literary portraits of  rich patrons. I do believe it high-time you had your portrait written, and, since you have failed to re-write Duane over into your preferred being for him, perhaps you may permit Duane to write your portrait,

Positing whatever is in your head in the third person is a hallmark of abject nuttery.

fragmentarily, of course, bit by bit, I would conjecture and conjure what I see when I imagine what and where you are? Okay? Negatio.

No. Not Ok.

[SaStrike]

Only 436 pages to go. We're close guys.

[negatio]

The substance of an argument is not somehow diluted by the manner in which it is communicated.  That's a bullshit cop out.  Try again.  Or don't.  I really don't care.

The above is an absurd claim. Of course I can dilute, even annihilate, the substance of an argument by the manner in which the argument is communicated. Reference the interchange between Jormungandr and myself, where she posited an argument which I shot-down precisely on the basis of the fallacious manner wherein she communicated the argument.
Please do not accuse me of bullshitting, I do not intentionally bullshit/mislead others. I am not bullshitting when I say you appear to be constantly on the rag! Negatio.