Ontological Disproof of God

[Abaddon_ire]

And now you are being intentionally dishonest. We have exchanged no private messages since the point at which I washed my hands of you. This will continue to be the case. You not only burned the bridges, you drained the river afterwards just out of obtuseness.

Bullshit, I am never intentionally dishonest.

Bullshit, it is your dishonest intransigent crappy attitude that has you where you are right now.

I am completely authentic, and, that authenticity is a part of what pisses you off.  It does not matter when we exchanged private mails, we did exchange mails.

How many after I washed my hands of your authentic bullshit?

All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against your own damned fucking inefficacious law, and, collectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.

Try reading the rules for comprehension.

[KevinM1]

If this place has been nothing but a source of negativity for you, then why remain? There are plenty of other atheist forums and philosophy forums on the web. It's not like Tibs gets extra funding from malcontents, so you staying here isn't doing anyone a favor.

[Mister Agenda]

I am absolutely and totally certain that members who have visited my thread are fairly well informed regarding why I am here and what I am doing here; it would be groveling to do so now, when I am  alienated by member conduct while I was a newbie, and, by the fact that Staff busted me, while they were breaking the law that newbies cannot be insulted in any location upon the forum.  Thank you. Negatio.

If you don't like this place, you can always go away. If you think you're being abused, you don't have to be a masochist about it. I hate to see you suffer.

[brewer]

emjay, I will have to attempt to regress into the past of my thread and find a little tiny :   here  which appears as a blue link in a reply from Kit. So while I have to figure out a polite way to reply to the radio personality person, who is approaching me via insult, with which I am overdosed , I believe it best to ignore his shit for the time being, and, in an attempt to teach myself to step aside from the good old presentation of one's self to me via insulting me,  I have, now, to fail to respond to the insult-laden query, and, thereby stay out of further problems with the inauthoritative authorities acting inauthoritatively aganist me here on the forum, and, yet ,are well able to , unethically, shame me unjustifiably;-- I best not, at this time, engage some radio dude who proceeds via insult, because, I could get supra-upset, and, take the wrong tack in a reply to some nauseating  spectacularistically-oriented horseshit or other.
If we could ever get back to shiggles via Platonic dialogical dialectic, he could, if  he has the brains and the ability to go up against someone who has essentially, via reason, prevailed in all engagements with Jormungandr , Abaddon-Ire, Vulcanlogician, and others,  join in on a future dialogic, but, until we resolve my anger over being punished by corrupt and inauthoritative authority, the radio personality will not, ever, have a chance to rattle my cage dialogically.  Negatio

bold mine

I haven't seen you prevail in the least. If you change prevail to evade, side step or dodge then I'd agree.

[Bob Kelso]

I haven't seen you prevail in the least. If you change prevail to evade, side step or dodge then I'd agree.

[negatio]

If this place has been nothing but a source of negativity for you, then why remain?  There are plenty of other atheist forums and philosophy forums on the web.  It's not like Tibs gets extra funding from malcontents, so you staying here isn't doing anyone a favor.

Kevin, Like I said, I thought you were asking why I did not join via the introductory forum and I have explained why. However your own impatience and quick-serve expectations were angered too too rapidly.  Even if I had originally understood that you wished me to post in  introductory portion of the forum, it would never have happened, for as Vulcanlogician said, I am not a groveler, after the shit treatment I have undergone for three weeks.  So sorry you got so damned mad! Shit.  If it wasn't for your help we would not have just won-out on the question of member/staff insult outside the newbies portion of the forum. Thank you so much for that, it was powerful, and, demonstrates staff does not know the very law they so clumsily attempt to enforce.  I think it was you to whom I sent an account of why I am here.  I stay now for the sake of encountering sessions like I was fortunate enough to experience with Vulcanlogician, however, now, I believe he is less upset about this thread not so much because of me, rather, it is probably on account of the atmosphere the thread exhibits on account of the ongoing employment against me of a methodology of insult. The insult will very possibly stop now, since, on account of Kit and you, the rule of law is now very clear.


I don't know, if media types were starting to upsurge here, would you leave ? I wouldn't.  Negatio.

[Angrboda]

Even if the section you quoted were a rule, it only says that members are not free to insult others without limit. But then, that's already been pointed out in the rules on flaming, as well as the prime directive. It's simply underscoring that there are limits on behavior, without actually setting any new limits. What it does not do is create a new rule whereby members are required to treat new members in any way differently than other members outside the introduction forum. Nobody has ever had carte blanche to be insulting or rude outside the introduction forum. It only requests that people try to be welcoming and friendly at all times. It does not say we are obligated to do so, nor that failure to do so will be punished.

[negatio]

All members and all staff which participated in so radically insulting me as a newbie ought, really, to write-yourselves all up for committing crimes against your own damned fucking inefficacious law, and, collectively, throw youselves all off the forum, for Christ's sake !  Negatio.

Try reading the rules for comprehension.


 
So far, I've read one, perhaps two, rules. Both beautifully written and beautifully intended. Did any of the members know of the non-insult statute extant on this Forum ?  Clearly not ! (You are incorrect about cramming exclamation and question marks directly into the end of a sentence, that was an intentional attempt of yours to mislead me, and, it worked for a little while).
I do not particularly believe in rules, for I know there is more humane and more efficient means to men conducting themselves civilly among one another than, via rules ! Did the rule
against insulting newbies work in the instance now in question ? No. And, the reason is not that staff and members had never heard of the particular law; it is rather, because so-called law is not, in fact, an efficacy among men.  It will be interesting to see how Losty and her co-horts, (Losty has, in past, been a tremendous help to me), manage the situation into which they are now thrown, regarding their own conduct, their own misconduct, the insult statute, and insulting persons like yourself, however, in your particular case, it is not insult, it is ire !  Negatiol.

[The Grand Nudger]

You'll be really frustrated, with no one to vent to, when the banhammer inevitably falls, lol.

Don't get me wrong. I'm rooting for you. I hope you make it passed this and join other luminaries of your kind here on the boards.

[Angrboda]