At work.

(December 30, 2018 at 6:52 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:

(December 30, 2018 at 6:23 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: I stand by my comments regarding your posting history, to which I am sure others will attest.

As for time consraintscin posting? This is why I add my current status as a heading or footnote.

As for dictionaries? As has been explained to you before they are only descriptive of the language in common parlance. Hence the yearly revisions, additions and reletions.

While, yet again, we see your behaviour on display with yet again the selective obfuscational reply given to myself.

Ahhh, okay.  Again, I don't care about the opinion of you and your clan.  If it has some special meaning to you, then congrats.

Got it.  Now the atheists don't believe in dictionaries.  *rolls eyes*

As I said, it was an offer.  If you have nothing, then expect nothing.  In light of that, can you stop with the pandering?

'Descriptive' was the word I used.

That you now sink to your seeming 'Default' level of pasive agressive victim......

Ah well.

(December 30, 2018 at 7:00 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

(December 30, 2018 at 6:52 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Ahhh, okay.  Again, I don't care about the opinion of you and your clan.  If it has some special meaning to you, then congrats.

Got it.  Now the atheists don't believe in dictionaries.  *rolls eyes*

As I said, it was an offer.  If you have nothing, then expect nothing.  In light of that, can you stop with the pandering?

'Descriptive' was the word I used.

That you now sink to your seeming 'Default' level of pasive agressive victim......

Ah well.

Ummm, no.  Dictionaries do more than that, especially the major ones that are online.

Not a victim.  Just someone trying to have objective dialogue, yet you seem to want to make unnecessary appeals and are continuously pandering.

"Don't use the dictionary for definitions"  Yep, good one there slick.  *rolls eyes*

At work.

Must admit M4X your replies do seem to become less coherant over time.

That you now double down on/with your replying is indicative of your nature.

(December 30, 2018 at 7:58 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

Must admit M4X your replies do seem to become less coherant over time.

That you now double down on/with your replying is indicative of your nature.

Anything objective?   If not, l propose we just do not discuss things with each other.  You think I'm incoherent, and I'm not a fan of your constant pandering.

73 pages and still no evidence for a god.

It is as I suspected.

Max has taught me how to avoid answering questions though. If I'm ever in an FBI interrogation, I think I'll be good.

(December 30, 2018 at 8:53 pm)Rahn127 Wrote: 73 pages and still no evidence for a god.

It is as I suspected.

Max has taught me how to avoid answering questions though. If I'm ever in an FBI interrogation, I think I'll be good.

You could always, if in that situation, try "speaking in tongues"; just chide them for their lack of faith, when necessary.

At work.

(December 30, 2018 at 8:38 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:

(December 30, 2018 at 7:58 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Must admit M4X your replies do seem to become less coherant over time.

That you now double down on/with your replying is indicative of your nature.

Anything objective?   If not, l propose we just do not discuss things with each other.  You think I'm incoherent, and I'm not a fan of your constant pandering.

Only your previous posts as an objective history, M4X.

(December 30, 2018 at 9:05 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

(December 30, 2018 at 8:38 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Anything objective?   If not, l propose we just do not discuss things with each other.  You think I'm incoherent, and I'm not a fan of your constant pandering.

Only your previous posts as an objective history, M4X.

Just gonna have to agree to disagree.

At work.

(December 30, 2018 at 9:08 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:

(December 30, 2018 at 9:05 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Only your previous posts as an objective history, M4X.

Just gonna have to agree to disagree.

We never got to a stage of disagreement M4X.

Just you strawmaning, obfuscating and asserting stuff all over the place.

If you'd like to have a meanigful dialogue?
That would be welcome.

(October 7, 2018 at 9:07 pm)Rahn127 Wrote: I believe I exist.

My evidence for my own existence is as follows.
I can see myself. I can feel myself.
My body has mass. I can weigh it.
I can displace water in a tub.
I reflect light. Other people can see me, can feel me.
There is a long list that I won't get into.

I believe my phone exists.
I can offer similar evidence for why I believe it exists.

I don't provide arguments to help prove that my phone exists. I provide my phone to prove it exists.

Does anyone have any tangible proof that a god exists ?

At the most basic level, our sun is a source of heat & light that appears each day in our lives. It is circular in appearance and at times can be blocked by the moon.

This is how people might have described the attributes of the sun many thousands of years ago.
They had no idea what it was made of or what happened within it on an atomic level or how much gravity it asserted on our planet.

They only knew a couple basic attributes, but those attributes allowed us to detect it's existence, even if we only knew .001% about it.

When it comes to a god, we know nothing.

A god could present itself in a godly human looking form for all to see. It could give off light that we could see. I could manafest in reality so that we would know it existed.

Well it could, if it really existed.
I don't believe it does.

In one of my hands I have an extremely small universe that contains a god.
In the other hand I have an extremely small universe that doesn't contain a god.

Can you determine which is which ?

To conclude.
Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?

Isn't everything that exists really evidence for God? Do you think the necessary chemicals and other building blocks of the universe could have just materialized out of thin air on their own? If so, how do you justify this belief?