I’m always wondering if people know we can see all the edits LOL
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 12:55 am
Thread Rating:
PSA: New Rule
|
(July 19, 2019 at 5:10 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I don’t think sexual harassment happens often enough here for the rule to ever be a problem. As usual, there’s always one douche tool who will force us to explicitly state what should be intuitively obvious. So legit question for the mods and any of the women of AF: has anyone here actually been sexually harrassed on this forum? I understand that damn near every woman (and many men) has experienced something somewhere in the ballpark, I just want to gauge how big a problem it is here specifically.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Losty, think of it as a group pm for mods! lol
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. RE: PSA: New Rule
July 21, 2019 at 4:39 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2019 at 1:25 pm by The Valkyrie.)
(July 20, 2019 at 11:51 pm)ignoramus Wrote: redacted In all the holes they can! We’re talking golf, right? Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (July 21, 2019 at 1:02 am)Rev. Rye Wrote:(July 19, 2019 at 5:10 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I don’t think sexual harassment happens often enough here for the rule to ever be a problem. As usual, there’s always one douche tool who will force us to explicitly state what should be intuitively obvious. Two people that I know of for certain. But the rule wasn't put in place to stop rampant, wide-spread harassment. It was instituted because 1) it is a particularly scummy behaviour for people to indulge in, and 2) because there was no rule in place that covered it. Theoretically then, we were left with the options of either allowing such behaviour or punishing people who hadn't broken a rule. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(July 21, 2019 at 1:02 am)Rev. Rye Wrote:(July 19, 2019 at 5:10 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I don’t think sexual harassment happens often enough here for the rule to ever be a problem. As usual, there’s always one douche tool who will force us to explicitly state what should be intuitively obvious. I can think of a few times when women here have been subjected to vile comments that were obviously not welcome. And some that were just sleazy. In fact it seems to be more recently than before. I wonder if Trump being such a sleazy prick has infected the character of the US? You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Thanks for the info.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad. (July 21, 2019 at 5:21 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: But the rule wasn't put in place to stop rampant, wide-spread harassment. It was instituted because 1) it is a particularly scummy behaviour for people to indulge in, and 2) because there was no rule in place that covered it. Theoretically then, we were left with the options of either allowing such behaviour or punishing people who hadn't broken a rule. This makes perfect sense to me. Sexual harassment is bullshit, and their ought to be rules against it. I don't see too much worrywarting over the implementation of this rule, which is dope. (July 21, 2019 at 9:45 am)vulcanlogician Wrote:(July 21, 2019 at 5:21 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: But the rule wasn't put in place to stop rampant, wide-spread harassment. It was instituted because 1) it is a particularly scummy behaviour for people to indulge in, and 2) because there was no rule in place that covered it. Theoretically then, we were left with the options of either allowing such behaviour or punishing people who hadn't broken a rule. And more than a little surprising. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Yeah, I think the random flirts over the forum, like Valk with Ig are of no concern, mostly sustained advances after a "ehhhh, sthap".
I never saw Ig saying stahp. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)