(March 25, 2020 at 1:35 pm)Drich Wrote:

(March 24, 2020 at 5:17 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: No, I'm foreelz that smart. I don't do shit that the admins have to rule on. If I did then I'd pay close attention when they did. You were too dumb to do that and got your dumb ass banned. And now you're whining about the mean intolerant atheists who wouldn't give you a free soapbox to promote your Youtube videos on.

Poor baby.

because you toe the line sport. You can never say anything so unpopular that you have over 100 members threaten to quit or get rid of one guy. you have no idea what it is like to be hated so much. most of you snow flakes have no idea how to function when the group has turned on you. For this reason alone is enough that the admins would never have to rule against you.

NOT TO MENTION THE RULING WAS FOR ME!

Are you so stupid as to not understand the implication?

To be exonerated for not breaking a rule then be ban for being exonerated? it means the admins hands were tied. they are letting everyone know like pilate they can find nothing wrong with this me, and washed their hands of it and handed me over to the mob which demanded i be bann for breaking a rule i was found innocent of breaking!!!

or did all of this go over your head?

---

(March 25, 2020 at 1:31 pm)no one Wrote: It appears that drick's final screw has fallen out.

said: No one of consequence

It's "to be BANNED". We've already been through this sport.

(March 25, 2020 at 1:35 pm)Drich Wrote: because you toe the line sport. You can never say anything so unpopular that you have over 100 members threaten to quit or get rid of one guy.

100 members?!? Name ten.

Quote:you have no idea what it is like to be hated so much.

Neither do you, poor little white boy.

Quote:most of you snow flakes

Hey, I'm not the one melting under the heat of my own hissy fit.

Quote:NOT TO MENTION THE RULING WAS FOR ME!

No it wasn't. The ruling was that you hadn't quite pissed the admins off enough to ban you that time.

Quote:Are you so stupid as to not understand the implication?

I understand that you couldn't stop being a jackass with a future that was obvious to everybody. Tell me, was it deliberate?

Quote:To be exonerated for not breaking a rule

(March 25, 2020 at 7:07 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:

(March 25, 2020 at 1:35 pm)Drich Wrote: because you toe the line sport. You can never say anything so unpopular that you have over 100 members threaten to quit or get rid of one guy. you have no idea what it is like to be hated so much. most of you snow flakes have no idea how to function when the group has turned on you. For this reason alone is enough that the admins would never have to rule against you.

NOT TO MENTION THE RULING WAS FOR ME!

Are you so stupid as to not understand the implication?

To be exonerated for not breaking a rule then be ban for being exonerated? it means the admins hands were tied. they are letting everyone know like pilate they can find nothing wrong with this me, and washed their hands of it and handed me over to the mob which demanded i be bann for breaking a rule i was found innocent of breaking!!!

or did all of this go over your head?

---

said: No one of consequence

It's "to be BANNED". We've already been through this sport.

5
yes we did and you are still wrong dummy.


To save this word, you'll need to log in.
[/url]Log In



\ ˈban  \
banned; banning
Definition of ban
 (Entry 1 of 3)
[url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transitive]transitive verb
1: to prohibit especially by legal meansban discrimination 

Is smoking banned  in all public buildings?

also : to prohibit the use, 
performance, or distribution of ban a book
ban a pesticide

2: banned from the U.N.

3archaic : It is a hard fate … to be banned … by the world, only because one has sought to be wiser than the world is.— Edward Bulwer Lytton

intransitive verb

use:
They signed agreements banning the use of chemical weapons. He was banned for three months for driving with no insurance.
...
ban Definitions and Synonyms ‌‌

present tense

he/she/it
bans
present participle
banning
past tense
banned
past participle
banned

have been banned from the website...
verse
 those doosh bags ban me for not breaking the rules.

do you not understand present and past tenses?

---

(March 25, 2020 at 10:09 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:

(March 25, 2020 at 1:35 pm)Drich Wrote: because you toe the line sport. You can never say anything so unpopular that you have over 100 members threaten to quit or get rid of one guy.

100 members?!? Name ten.

yo mamma (she so fat she counts as 9) and yo daddy (he's no account) and you.
like what i did there?

Quote:Neither do you, poor little white boy.

kinda do and im not white. I could have been saved from 1/2 the fights in my life if i were.

Quote:No it wasn't. The ruling was that you hadn't quite pissed the admins off enough to ban you that time.

it was for me as an admin specificly said "he is creating content for this website and has done nothing wrong.

Then one of the others admins who i think only posted once posted in my last post and said he is going to change either his vote or the other admins vote on what i was doing. cant remember don't have access. either way later on was ban for an act i was exonerated from originally..

Quote:I understand that you couldn't stop being a jackass with a future that was obvious to everybody. Tell me, was it deliberate?

if the future is so obvious, then why is it ok here to do? but not there?

make you feel any batter there was a 60 page rant where everyone tried to get me ban here. same deal people threatened to leave, but the admins here believe in the preservation of free speech with in the rules and have enough integrity to stand up to fascists who want to have total control or mastery of anything being discussed.

Quote:To be exonerated for not breaking a rule

[/quote]

because i as everyone else was literally told in my second to last thread i had done nothing wrong.

why can't you simply except how unfair people who are not like you can be treated by your peers? really if you guys had all the answers then why would have to come down to silencing a voice by ban rather than debate?

Is cognitive thought banned in that numb skull of yours drick?

(March 26, 2020 at 2:02 pm)no one Wrote: Is cognitive thought banned in that numb skull of yours drick?

said no one of consequence.

Well, what do you know? We've got ourselves a real wakin', talkin' broken record that truly believes it is clever.

(March 26, 2020 at 1:15 pm)Drich Wrote:

(March 25, 2020 at 7:07 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: It's "to be BANNED". We've already been through this sport.

5
yes we did and you are still wrong dummy.

YOUR OWN post proves again you are too fucking stupid to even read a definition. 
To ban is an infinitive, an action, a verb. 
You were not ban. You were banned. Past tense. 
Please keep it up. 
Demonstrating what an ignorant red neck fool you are, puts everything you write in proper context. 
I forget, did you graduate from 4th Grade ?
But I do appreciate as always your BIG RED LETTERS.

"The past tense of ban is banned.
The third-person singular simple present indicative form of ban is bans.
The present participle of ban is banning.
The past participle of ban is banned."

You can try to fake it some of the time ... you can't fake it all of the time.
You have nothing at all to offer here.
Get lost.

@Drich

100 members?! Jesus Christ, Drich it was like, four. Your delusions of grandeur are really quite entering. 😂🤦‍♀️

So Derpich is still pushing his tall tales of martyrdom 

(March 26, 2020 at 1:15 pm)Drich Wrote:

(March 25, 2020 at 10:09 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: 100 members?!? Name ten.

yo mamma (she so fat she counts as 9) and yo daddy (he's no account) and you.
 like what i did there?

You mean failed to name a single person who called for your ban? Waiting for these hundred members. List them or be forever known a liar.

Quote:

Quote:No it wasn't. The ruling was that you hadn't quite pissed the admins off enough to ban you that time.

it was for me as an admin specificly said "he is creating content for this website and has done nothing wrong.

Except you hadn't created it for that website, as you've admitted.

Is that really what the admins said? Or did it read more like "We can't quite justify banning your dumb ass yet but stop acting like a jack-ass"?

Quote:but the admins here believe in the preservation of free speech

The argument from free speech is the ultimate concession. It concedes that the best thing that can be said for your argument is that you cannot literally be jailed for making it.

Quote:because i as everyone else was literally told in my second to last thread i had done nothing wrong.

Getting away with it is not the same as not doing anything wrong.

Quote:why can't you simply except how unfair people who are not like you can be treated by your peers?

Poor baby doesn't have an atheist forum to preach at. Would you like some cheese with that whine?

---

(March 26, 2020 at 9:30 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Drich

100 members?! Jesus Christ, Drich it was like, four. Your delusions of grandeur are really quite entering. 😂🤦‍♀️

It's like the tale of the loaves and fishes. A lot less impressive when it's Jesus making tuna sandwiches to feed three.