The video of the Capitol police letting the rioters in doesn’t exonerate the rioters. In fact, it incriminates the Capitol police who did it. And we’ve known about this since at least a day or two after it happened.

https://www.businessinsider.com/capitol-...ers-2021-1

Also, I can’t help but notice that if Pro-Trump protesters riot in the Capitol and cause $2.5 million in damage, Drich will defend them to the death, but when 7 percent of BLM’s overwhelmingly peaceful protests, cause minor damage, he’s ready to write off the entire movement as terrorists.

Man, Trump’s toadstool-shaped cock must taste great, drich!

They're talking themselves into doing it again. They'll keep doing it until they're stopped..or it works. The venn diagram of political conservativism and domestic extremism is becoming a single circle.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.busines...21-5%3famp

I wonder how often he barricaded the doors during previous ‘tourist visits’.

Boru

(May 17, 2021 at 12:28 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(May 17, 2021 at 12:08 pm)Drich Wrote: with a fire extinguisher? google it. the story was fake. then they said he ingested some sort of poison again fake. finally the ME said there was no head trauma only stroke./natural causes. guess you and eveyone else missed that one too huh? have you not seen the pattern the new has been following since the WMD search? make a wild claim and when the next big smoke screen goes up retract when no one is looking.
https://www.wtae.com/article/medical-rul...s/36167307#
https://www.snopes.com/ap/2021/04/19/bri...al-causes/

Drich, first you claim that there was no riot, no insurrection and that it was a regular visit, and you call media that claim it was a violent riot as fake, only to link to a Snopes article that calls the happening a riot and Jan. 6 insurrection. They should be fake news by your standards.

Remember when you wrote:

Drich Wrote:what riot? do you mean when capitol police unlocked the doors and invited protesters in allowed the capitol building to be filled with protesters and then blitzkrieg attacked the at the time non violent protesters?

maybe this is what was meant when he said it was like a regular visit: note the fake news trying to make it sound like the russians took the building by force:

Also, the article acknowledges he was attacked by the insurrectionists. Which alone proves our point. Peaceful tourists don't go around assaulting people with fire extinguishers, And fake you expect consistency from Derptch?

Drippy

Quote:with a fire extinguisher? google it. the story was fake. then they said he ingested some sort of poison again fake. finally the ME said there was no head trauma only stroke./natural causes. guess you and eveyone else missed that one too huh? have you not seen the pattern the new has been following since the WMD search? make a wild claim and when the next big smoke screen goes up retract when no one is looking.
https://www.wtae.com/article/medical-rul...s/36167307#
https://www.snopes.com/ap/2021/04/19/bri...al-causes/

Actually it isn't fake, and here it is. 
And as for the Bear spray, (the poison), that's not fake either.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-wo...story.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new...k-n1265876
Multiple sources.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-...story.html
This information is widely reported by multiple outlets. If Drippy gets these easy easy things so wrong, how can he get anything right ?

(May 17, 2021 at 1:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.busines...21-5%3famp

I wonder how often he barricaded the doors during previous ‘tourist visits’.

Boru

He's a Republican. I wouldn't be surprised to learn his house barricaded and that he spends all his off-time cowering behind it with a loaded gun. Believing that the evil communist Joe Biden is coming to take away his beef and Dr Suess books before cancelling him on Twitter

---

(May 17, 2021 at 2:31 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Drippy

Quote:with a fire extinguisher? google it. the story was fake. then they said he ingested some sort of poison again fake. finally the ME said there was no head trauma only stroke./natural causes. guess you and eveyone else missed that one too huh? have you not seen the pattern the new has been following since the WMD search? make a wild claim and when the next big smoke screen goes up retract when no one is looking.
https://www.wtae.com/article/medical-rul...s/36167307#
https://www.snopes.com/ap/2021/04/19/bri...al-causes/

Actually it isn't fake, and here it is. 

Yup while he didn't die from the hit. That was still assaulting someone with a weapon. NOT SOMETHING peaceful tourists do.

And peaceful tourists don’t cause millions worth of damage to the building they’re touring. Unless maybe they’re one of those obscenely rich people who can afford to visit the Titanic at the bottom of the ocean.

(May 17, 2021 at 12:28 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(May 17, 2021 at 12:08 pm)Drich Wrote: with a fire extinguisher? google it. the story was fake. then they said he ingested some sort of poison again fake. finally the ME said there was no head trauma only stroke./natural causes. guess you and eveyone else missed that one too huh? have you not seen the pattern the new has been following since the WMD search? make a wild claim and when the next big smoke screen goes up retract when no one is looking.
https://www.wtae.com/article/medical-rul...s/36167307#
https://www.snopes.com/ap/2021/04/19/bri...al-causes/

Drich, first you claim that there was no riot, no insurrection and that it was a regular visit, and you call media that claim it was a violent riot as fake, only to link to a Snopes article that calls the happening a riot and Jan. 6 insurrection. They should be fake news by your standards.

Remember when you wrote:

Drich Wrote:what riot? do you mean when capitol police unlocked the doors and invited protesters in allowed the capitol building to be filled with protesters and then blitzkrieg attacked the at the time non violent protesters?

maybe this is what was meant when he said it was like a regular visit: note the fake news trying to make it sound like the russians took the building by force:

Insurrection : 
The act of rising against civil authority or governmental restraint; specifically, the armed resistance of a number of persons to the power of the state; incipient or limited rebellion.

A armed rebellion did not occur.

and ican argue neither did the other two definations:

• n.
  The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.
  
  
• n.
  A rising up; uprising.
  
  
  
  
  

there was no open revolt. and nothing rose up we did not birth a movement nor another nation. the government did not employ the army/force to disburse the protesters. monday came and everyone went home. you confusing this with the chaz movement/freedom zone.

It can only be an insurrection if the other guy does it, even if you have to make up the other guys, and no matter what you do.

(May 17, 2021 at 12:55 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:

(May 17, 2021 at 12:08 pm)Drich Wrote: i left video of this up in this thread. the only people missed it are those who single source their news from the fake news media. this is common knoweledge for anyone who wants to know the truth. again example all you have to do is click on the videos provided and watch the cops literally invite protesters in.

So what, Dripshit. You are so fucking gullible and childish.
Your cherry picked video does not tell the story. Either you know that, and lying, or you're just stupid. Maybe both.
The full SET of videos are what they are. They are not "single source" anything. 
The Insurrection Commission will look at everything that happened, and fool liar and deniers, not unlike yourself, will be shown to be the traitirs you are.
"Some" of the cops will be found to be complicit in the crimes, as everyone knows. What, you live under a rock. Oh well. You do. Even an active duty Marine was an assaulter.
The fact that a few criminal cops let some in, does not give anyone the right to even *go*in, and certainly not to destroy all that government property.
Yeah, you cherry pick your videos, and then lie abut what actually happened. You're such a low-life.
Your god Trump LIED and said he would go down to the capitol with them. He ABANDONED them. THEY have said that. You're promoting mob rule, idiot. 
We also get you actually know nothing about the riot/insurrection. MULTIPLE (that means more than one Drippy) entrances to the capitol were entered and breached.
NOT just the one where the crooked police let them in.

Let me make it simple at your simple level.
If a security guard lets in some burglars to a business, does that make it OK  for the burglers to destroy and rob shit ?
That's what you're saying here, that it is OK.

Multiple sources. 




videos. 

my slow friend.. your videos are at best tertiary source material, as the video's themselves have commentators to tell you what to think about the video. the MOMENT these videos is edited and compiled in a specific way to lend it self or to draw out a narrative your videos can be dismissed as active governement propaganda.. 

did you not see the difference between the multiple sourced raw video only commented by the person co-witnessing said events, of capitol police opening what was a locked door and guide people into the building. these men openly wrong full police uniforms. they were clearly on the inside while the protesters were on the outside until the door was opened and people/protesters let in... do you not see the difference between you 3 second videos and 10 second explaination of what you saw verses witnessing the full event of being locked out door open by police and escorted into the building?

That is the difference between primary source material ( actual unedited eye witness film) 
Secondary material (eye witness testimony/someone telling you who was there what had happened)
Tertiary material, like you news cast/someone explaining third hand what had happened.

then you have fake news/ Government propaganda. where videos are highly edited from many different povs and sources all to tell one story a piece at a time because no one source can tell or proof the web being spun by several sources at once.

If you ever went to school wrote a paper or researched anything in the real world you would understand how a primary sourced material TRUMP 1000 propaganda videos. how secondary material ALWAYS TRUMPS propaganda. How even Tertiary material TRUMPS your fake news/gov propaganda. 

So again sport it is not enough just to have three sources to quote from. your source material must be credible. when you quoted a news cast who chops together and eddits 10 different video sources to tell one story then you are quoting propaganda. as real reporting allows the material/proof tell the story on it's own. if your news were real they would not need a compilation of videos to sell you a story. one irrufutable video would do it.

Like how my video refutes the idea that the crowd in masse tried to loot an destroy the capitol building. that this same crowd identified someone who was trying to break a window as intifa in a trump hat, not only stopped him but beat him up for his trouble. it wasnt till after this person was well under control and those people had all calmed back down did the police react with gas. which triggered the panic the news clip showed, and announced it as a crowd of people trying to break in, while they were trying to get away from the gas. it is completely disgusting how you allow yourself to be manipulated and controlled just to paint your neighbor in the worst possible light. not only that you sell every ounce of integrity to do it.