Posts: 46019
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 7:01 pm
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2021 at 7:02 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
As many of you know by now, Drich has been permanently and forevermore banned. The tipping point was when he tried to portray Bill Cosby’s history of serial rape as business as usual.
Going forward, rape apologetics will be an actionable offense on these Forums and will not be tolerated. It will be considered and punished as trolling (under the ‘Making provocative posts’ clause). Rape apologetics will consist of but not be limited to:
-Condoning sexual assault.
-Downplaying sexual assault.
-Blaming the victims of sexual assault.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 7:05 pm
Not surprising considering how some Jebus sniffers consider women as chattel....
Posts: 46019
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 7:07 pm
(July 13, 2021 at 7:05 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Not surprising considering how some Jebus sniffers consider women as chattel....
One less of those to worry about on AF, now.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 10994
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 7:11 pm
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2021 at 7:12 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(July 13, 2021 at 7:01 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: As many of you know by now, Drich has been permanently and forevermore banned. The tipping point was when he tried to portray Bill Cosby’s history of serial rape as business as usual.
Going forward, rape apologetics will be an actionable offense on these Forums and will not be tolerated. It will be considered and punished as trolling (under the ‘Making provocative posts’ clause). Rape apologetics will consist of but not be limited to:
-Condoning sexual assault.
-Downplaying sexual assault.
-Blaming the victims of sexual assault.
Boru
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 5813
Threads: 86
Joined: November 19, 2017
Reputation:
59
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 7:18 pm
Well, I didn't catch Drich's "illuminating" post, but it seems to me, it should be okay to portray rape as "business as usual."
I think it *is* business as usual in many ways... has been for centuries... and I'm outraged at this state of affairs. It should be okay to state the facts of the matter.
I'm assuming that Drich condoned, downplayed, or blamed the victims. But maybe Drich isn't the originator of the idea that such things are okay. I fault the Bible. After all, insufficient regard is afforded victims of rape in the OT. "You owe my dad silver pieces. And I may be forced to marry you." That's pretty much all it says on the matter.
PSA: Bad idea to get your moral values from the law decrees of ancient brutal nomadic tribes.
Posts: 12120
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 7:31 pm
It was mostly downplaying the severity of what he did, conflating partying and playing the field with drugging and raping women. In fairness, I’m not convinced that he knows the difference. You’d think someone sane would have some ide of what the difference is, but given that many evangelicals see the world like this:
I can’t truly shake the possibility that his view of the world is just that stunted.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 1527
Threads: 13
Joined: May 17, 2016
Reputation:
18
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 8:54 pm
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2021 at 9:48 pm by AkiraTheViking.)
I read some of his rantings and I loved how he use the whole rape in Hollywood is "business as usual" as a jumping point to spew his rape apologist nonesense. He doesn't get that, no matter what gender you are, you'd be rape in show business and that shouldn't be "business as usual" yet it is and it's wrong.
Hell I'm into consensual non consent gay porn and even I don't like actual rape becuase it hurts someone and becuase of the millions of male rape victims that are, for the most part, not taken seriously. I have this thing called empathy, which is something he clearly lacks.
(July 13, 2021 at 7:31 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: It was mostly downplaying the severity of what he did, conflating partying and playing the field with drugging and raping women. In fairness, I’m not convinced that he knows the difference. You’d think someone sane would have some ide of what the difference is, but given that many evangelicals see the world like this:
I can’t truly shake the possibility that his view of the world is just that stunted.
To them pedophillia is bad unless a priest does it, then they turn the other cheek.
Posts: 4446
Threads: 87
Joined: December 2, 2009
Reputation:
47
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 9:38 pm
Watch that them classification, unless it’s the other them those folks are assholes. Might want to expand and clarify topics of rape apologetics. Probably shouldn’t allow discussions of rape scenes on movies as well.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Posts: 1527
Threads: 13
Joined: May 17, 2016
Reputation:
18
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 9:52 pm
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2021 at 9:53 pm by AkiraTheViking.)
^ What more is there to clarify? I think op was very clear. Also talking about rape as well as rape scenes in a work of fiction is not the same as making excuses for someone who actually raped someone.
Posts: 16396
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: PSA: Rape Apologetics
July 13, 2021 at 9:58 pm
(July 13, 2021 at 9:38 pm)tackattack Wrote: Watch that them classification, unless it’s the other them those folks are assholes. Might want to expand and clarify topics of rape apologetics. Probably shouldn’t allow discussions of rape scenes on movies as well.
Did you read Drich's posts?
|