She means your tone knucklehead

(August 21, 2021 at 8:24 pm)Mashmont Wrote:

(August 21, 2021 at 8:19 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Correlation does not equal causation. Do you even science, bro?

In some cases where there are few or no other variables,  correlation does indeed equal causation.

My degree is in math.   Yours, sis?

Oh, which confounding variables have you controlled for? Is your research on this subject published somewhere? I’d love to examine your study design and methodology.

In the Religious Journal of Hooey, naturally.

(August 21, 2021 at 10:06 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(August 21, 2021 at 8:24 pm)Mashmont Wrote: In some cases where there are few or no other variables,  correlation does indeed equal causation.

My degree is in math.   Yours, sis?

Oh, which confounding variables have you controlled for? Is your research on this subject published somewhere? I’d love to examine your study design and methodology.

I'm very pleased my church has cut down pedophilia drastically by reducing the number of gays entering the seminary.  One would think if you cared about kids, you'd be celebrating this successful step instead of trying to minimize it.  And of course you haven't come up with another cause for the sharp decline in new cases.  Unless of course you'd like to offer it here.  I'm sure the forum would love to see it.

We'll wait.

(August 21, 2021 at 10:18 pm)Mashmont Wrote:

(August 21, 2021 at 10:06 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Oh, which confounding variables have you controlled for? Is your research on this subject published somewhere? I’d love to examine your study design and methodology.

I'm very pleased my church has cut down pedophilia drastically by reducing the number of gays entering the seminary.  One would think if you cared about kids, you'd be celebrating this successful step instead of trying to minimize it.  And of course you haven't come up with another cause for the sharp decline in new cases.  Unless of course you'd like to offer it here.

Oh, so basically you’re talking out your ass. I mean…tell us something we didn’t already know. Bro.

Except that pedophilia isn't a gay thing. Also, pedophiles typically don't discriminate based on gender.

(August 21, 2021 at 8:17 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Extra Extra, read all about it

https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporte...ic-church/

"
The Pillar, a conservative Catholic news blog, claimed that an analysis of cell phone data showed Catholic priests using Grindr, despite taking strict vows of celibacy when they enter the priesthood and the Church’s stance that homosexuality is a sin.
"

So much for that ban...

---

Wait. Wait.  Wait.   You leftwingers have been telling us homosexuality and pedophilia are unrelated,  that the church didn't have a 'gay' problem.   Now it turns out the liberal wing of the church,  the ones who say Joe Biden is a swell Catholic,  has gays using Grindr.

Kind of flushes the 'gays don't molest boys' meme down the toilet, doesn't it?

(August 21, 2021 at 10:25 pm)Foxaire Wrote: Except that pedophilia isn't a gay thing. Also, pedophiles typically don't discriminate based on gender.

Duh. He knows that. Low-effort troll is obvious. Has he been here all day?

(August 21, 2021 at 10:25 pm)Foxaire Wrote: Except that pedophilia isn't a gay thing. Also, pedophiles typically don't discriminate based on gender.

If pedos don't discriminate based on gender, why were more than 80% of the victims boys in the prosecuted priest molestation cases?

Just a coincidence?

Quote:I'm very pleased my church has cut down pedophilia drastically by reducing the number of gays entering the seminary.

Something you have yet to even demonstrate as true

Quote:  One would think if you cared about kids, you'd be celebrating this successful step instead of trying to minimize it. 

Why would we celebrate a series of unproven claims? 

Quote:And of course, you haven't come up with another cause for the sharp decline in new cases.

I literally gave you two in my original comment. Nor would it matter if she did because a lack of an alternative would not make your unfounded hypothesis true.

Quote:  Unless of course, you'd like to offer it here.

She doesn't need to because she's not claiming a positive hypothesis. You are. One littered with holes and unjustified assumptions.

You seriously suck at this