It's how it looks......

[video=youtube]http://https://youtu.be/FpApJZDn9g4[/video]





fixt that 4 ya - too many https's - awty

I think the coding is off here, OB.

(I know, because I haven’t done it once, myself, without fucking it up the first time. 😂)

Odd part is it shows properly on preview....

But I am not going to throw a hissy fit over a hissy fit..

Got it now.

#Accurate

😂

And while we're on that subject, the point Huggy made about how he can't possibly be homophobic because he doesn't use any anti-gay slurs (nevermind that the #1 most common one is three letters, and thus impossible to search with our software, so we can't verify that) stuck with me. And since I can't reply in the thread (what with it being closed,) I figure I may as well make a counterpoint here.

Last year, Steven Crowder made a video about the Biden administration's stimulus to black farmers. It was alarmingly racist. Vaush has a video where he goes over it (This Steven Crowder Bit Was SO RACIST YouTube Had To Take It Down), and while I'm not going to show it here for obvious reasons,  you can just copy paste the title in parentheses, go on YouTube and find it.

The closest thing to a slur I could find was him referencing "coloured people," something he walked back almost immediately. And it turns out that was probably the least racist thing he did in the video (except maybe his revealing that he can't do fucking subtraction, since he thinks 2021-1965=a century ago), with things like:

• Crowder balking at the very idea of black people farming.
  
• Implying/outright stating that black people are lazy and just want handouts.
  
• On that note, implying that the thing black people hated about slavery was that they didn't want to work on farms and not, you know, everything else.
  
• Using a cringey "blaccent" that I'm sure would do Gosden and Correll proud.
  
• That "American Gothic" graphic with the hoodrat.
  
• Thinking they'd be ignorant enough to try and plant Cognac and Meth in the ground.
  
• You can probably find more shit in the video if you're looking for it.
  

And watching the original, Vaush-free video on Twitter, I neglected to turn the audio on until after he said "coloured people." Does the fact that I didn't hear that term, but did hear all the other horseshit make it any less racist? If not, does the fact that Huggy Bear keeps peddling harmful anti-gay stereotypes without using homophobic slurs any less bad? Why the fuck not?

(February 17, 2022 at 10:44 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: And while we're on that subject, the point Huggy made about how he can't possibly be homophobic because he doesn't use any anti-gay slurs (nevermind that the #1 most common one is three letters, and thus impossible to search with our software, so we can't verify that) stuck with me. And since I can't reply in the thread (what with it being closed,) I figure I may as well make a counterpoint here.

Last year, Steven Crowder made a video about the Biden administration's stimulus to black farmers. It was alarmingly racist. Vaush has a video where he goes over it (This Steven Crowder Bit Was SO RACIST YouTube Had To Take It Down), and while I'm not going to show it here for obvious reasons,  you can just copy paste the title in parentheses, go on YouTube and find it.

The closest thing to a slur I could find was him referencing "coloured people," something he walked back almost immediately. And it turns out that was probably the least racist thing he did in  the video (except maybe his revealing that he can't do fucking subtraction, since he thinks 2021-1965=a century ago), with things like:

• Crowder balking at the very idea of black people farming.
  
• Implying/outright stating that black people are lazy and just want handouts.
  
• On that note, implying that the thing black people hated about slavery was that they didn't want to work on farms and not, you know, everything else.
  
• Using a cringey "blaccent" that I'm sure would do Gosden and Correll proud.
  
• That "American Gothic" graphic with the hoodrat.
  
• Thinking they'd be ignorant enough to try and plant Cognac and Meth in the ground.
  
• You can probably find more shit in the video if you're looking for it.
  

And watching the original, Vaush-free video on Twitter, I neglected to turn the audio on until after he said "coloured people." Does the fact that I didn't hear that term, but did hear all the other horseshit make it any less racist? If not, does the fact that Huggy Bear keeps peddling harmful anti-gay stereotypes without using homophobic slurs any less bad? Why the fuck not?

Stop it  

The point was you can't find any history of me saying anything homophobic (I've been on this forum 10 years) which is weird for someone who "stalks" threads (according to LFC) in order to troll LBGT, but if you search the N-word there are 31 pages of results, some people who have been temp banned for using the word, and believe black people had low intelligence yet notice how no one ever refers to them as racist :  

There was one gay news thread which Foxaire (who also has a history of talking greasy about black people) created (because he loves attention) and I simply posted NEWS articles in that thread, are the news articles homophobic? If not, then how does me posting them make me homophobic? The irony is that my actions were considered homophobic (as defined by you guys), but the people posting news about black people in an unrelated thread was somehow not racist, let that logic sink in... according to LFC she was trying to teach me a lesson, because in her mind two wrongs actually make a right.

All I do is state undeniable facts, YOU guys draw a twisted conclusion of the facts then use that conclusion to start banning people from threads, case in point...


This is an undeniable fact.


This is an actual quote from LFC, You see the conclusion that she drew from a factual statement? Then I get hit with a ban based on my "TONE" (Not making this up) what tone? I only stated a fact, the tone comes from your own imagination...

Another example, when LFC was asking me about what I thought about the other women in the Cosby case essentially I told her it was moot because of statute of limitation, WHICH IS FACT, yet watch the following conclusion.

(July 20, 2021 at 1:38 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote:

(July 20, 2021 at 12:59 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Huggy Bear

What are your excuses for the other 58 women?

Statute of limitations.

(July 20, 2021 at 2:00 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(July 20, 2021 at 1:38 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: Statute of limitations.

So you don’t actually care if he raped someone. As long as he can’t be held accountable by the legal system you’re good with it?

*emphasis mine*

Awaiting incomming ban for rape apology....

No one cares how long you've been here.

(February 19, 2022 at 12:03 am)arewethereyet Wrote: No one cares how long you've been here.

It's kind of relevant if you're going to claim I'm something, yet there's no past history of it.

BTW, I like how you pick the most insignificant part of the post to comment on...

So now you come to another thread to whine .....Lol 

(February 19, 2022 at 12:07 am)Huggy Bear Wrote:

(February 19, 2022 at 12:03 am)arewethereyet Wrote: No one cares how long you've been here.

It's kind of relevant if you're going to claim I'm something, yet there's no past history of it.

BTW, I like how you pick the most insignificant part of the post to comment on...

If it were insignificant you wouldn't keep repeating it.