Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 4:53 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
#11
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
I blame the Scots!

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#12
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 4:05 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(August 27, 2023 at 1:55 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: See?

Boru
See what?

See how well your reply supports my previous points.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#13
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
How can you use Wikipedia but can't use Google?
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
#14
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 11:41 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Anyone who takes Wiki as a solid source is being mentally lazy. You have to take each article on its merits regarding accuracy and detail.

Thant is the common view of Wiki, and there is some truth to it.

But...
The Sydney Morning Herald Wrote:...a review of 110 studies published in 2014 concluded “Wikipedia is generally a reliable source of information” across almost all domains studied.
Source

From what I've read on the subject, Wiki's main failings are in areas of esoterica, subjects that few people concern themselves with, providing few editors, and pop culture, where "accurate information" is constantly changing and editor opinions drive more edits (and edit wars) than actual facts. In general, if you go looking for astronomical data on nearby stars, flight characteristics of a boing 767, or the nutritional information of the top five crops produced in India, you'll get information at least as good as Britannica. But, if you go looking for the mating rituals of Klingons (or the Kardashians, equally alien and repulsive) or information about semi-professional bowlers in Bend, Oregon, your results are gonna be much more suspect.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#15
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 4:37 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 27, 2023 at 4:05 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: See what?

See how well your reply supports my previous points.

Boru

No, I don't see it. Do you agree with me that somebody who says "Fuck off with those p-values, go to Alternativa with them!" both has a mistaken picture of how modern science works and is being a jerk? If not, have you watched the Veritasium's video about why most published research is wrong (explaining how modern science revolves around p-values and what are the upsides and downsides of that)?
Reply
#16
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 2:24 pm)no one Wrote: Good thing about the sciences, it doesn't give a single flying fuck whether or not some, or all the dingleberries ideas about it are wrong. It's going to work regardless.

You make it sound like science is like its own entity or something that operates independently of human beings.
Reply
#17
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 5:40 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(August 27, 2023 at 4:37 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: See how well your reply supports my previous points.

Boru

No, I don't see it. Do you agree with me that somebody who says "Fuck off with those p-values, go to Alternativa with them!" both has a mistaken picture of how modern science works and is being a jerk? If not, have you watched the Veritasium's video about why most published research is wrong (explaining how modern science revolves around p-values and what are the upsides and downsides of that)?

What's the context? I feel like there was a lot of things going on in the exchange between you and them that eventually led to this kind of response.
Reply
#18
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 5:28 pm)Ravenshire Wrote:
(August 27, 2023 at 11:41 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Anyone who takes Wiki as a solid source is being mentally lazy. You have to take each article on its merits regarding accuracy and detail.

Thant is the common view of Wiki, and there is some truth to it.

But...
The Sydney Morning Herald Wrote:...a review of 110 studies published in 2014 concluded “Wikipedia is generally a reliable source of information” across almost all domains studied.
Source

From what I've read on the subject, Wiki's main failings are in areas of esoterica, subjects that few people concern themselves with, providing few editors, and pop culture, where "accurate information" is constantly changing and editor opinions drive more edits (and edit wars) than actual facts. In general, if you go looking for astronomical data on nearby stars, flight characteristics of a boing 767, or the nutritional information of the top five crops produced in India, you'll get information at least as good as Britannica. But, if you go looking for the mating rituals of Klingons (or the Kardashians, equally alien and repulsive) or information about semi-professional bowlers in Bend, Oregon, your results are gonna be much more suspect.

Yeah, in the fields I know in-depth, it's a questionable source. Like GS said upthread, look at the sources. They can -- repeat, can -- be good sources.

Reply
#19
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 5:40 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(August 27, 2023 at 4:37 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: See how well your reply supports my previous points.

Boru

No, I don't see it. Do you agree with me that somebody who says "Fuck off with those p-values, go to Alternativa with them!" both has a mistaken picture of how modern science works and is being a jerk? If not, have you watched the Veritasium's video about why most published research is wrong (explaining how modern science revolves around p-values and what are the upsides and downsides of that)?

My point isn’t with other people saying it, but with your reaction.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#20
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
Boring. Fuck your p values, I wanna hear some more war crime denials.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Google's Mobile-Friendly Test Driving Me Batty: What am I Doing Wrong? Rhondazvous 10 3139 August 14, 2015 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Reading redefined! Napoléon 31 4091 April 18, 2014 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: NoraBrimstone
  Please give me link voting english website A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c 4 1752 December 24, 2013 at 2:29 am
Last Post: A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c
  Idea for a service / business. Tiberius 3 1464 April 27, 2012 at 5:17 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Prof. Alan Woodward is Wrong; The Internet is Fine Tiberius 14 5842 March 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)