(April 1, 2012 at 4:22 am)Tiberius Wrote: I still don't believe you are a B-cup.

I'm with Tibers on this one. Even seeing wouldn't be believing for me. I'd have to heft one to be sure. The volume you can get in your mouth is another test, but I hesitate to over-reach concerning royalty.

Measuring tapes don't lie, boys.

Don't forget that TSQ is about 5'2".

Hmm, that is true.

I'm 5'3". What does that have to do with anything?

You're smaller, so we have to scale everything down.

(March 28, 2012 at 4:12 pm)One King Wrote: Perhaps more time could be spent in school instead of being sexually promiscuous.

I'm just sayin ladies. No real man likes filthy sluts.

I bet you would like me.

(March 28, 2012 at 4:12 pm)One King Wrote: Perhaps more time could be spent in school instead of being sexually promiscuous.

I'm just sayin ladies. No real man likes filthy sluts.

I prefer exclusive relationships to open ones, though I'm not going to tell people how to live their lives.

That said, there are sooo. . . many things wrong with this short post. Sexual promiscuity isn't the opposite of school. People can be promiscuous and very intelligent/well educated. I'm not speaking from bias here- I'm pretty much the opposite of promiscuous. But assigning people labels based on completely unrelated facets of their lives serves nothing but ignorance, and ignorance feeds bigotry. Schooling is unrelated to sexual habits. Lumping them together in a directly inverse relationship exposes your disgusting bias.

Now, as for "no real man likes filthy sluts", I contend that plenty do, the exact amount depending on the definition of "real man." Does "real man" mean self-respecting man? Physically strong man? Supportive and understanding man? A man who was born male without undergoing trans-gender surgery? No doubt you think that religion has something to do with what makes a "real man." I don't think that. I don't even believe in the concept of a "real man." All men are "real" men. Qualities that some people find attractive, others find repulsive. You can't just assign the exclusive term "real men" to whatever sect you want. Who's a real man and who isn't ultimately is just an opinion held on a case by case basis by the people who know him.

Next, your definition of "filthy slut" is ridiculous. Posting sexual images and text on a forum does in no way, shape or form make someone a slut.

---

(April 1, 2012 at 1:36 pm)LittleMissAwesome Wrote:

(March 28, 2012 at 4:12 pm)One King Wrote: Perhaps more time could be spent in school instead of being sexually promiscuous.

I'm just sayin ladies. No real man likes filthy sluts.

I bet you would like me.

I doubt it. Your profile picture shows a shoulder. Clearly indecent.

Had another nasty sinus headache this morning because of the smokers we walked through leaving the burlesque last night so as soon as I felt somewhat stable I left my dusty room for the open air (no pollen allergies, thank FSM). Basically I dicked about in the park a bit, and then dicked about with the filters on the photo editing program I downloaded.



And then I drove home singing along to Frank Sinatra.

Aegrus Wrote:A man who was born male without undergoing trans-gender surgery?

Wha....???? 0.o

A man... who was born male... why would he undergo such surgeries as inverting his genitals, growing breasts, and cutting away his adam's apple?

A woman born male is one thing, even a genderqueer individual born male without desiring a full transition completely from one end of the gender binary to the other...

But a man born male? Perish the thought