(September 8, 2012 at 1:28 am)cato123 Wrote: Nice try. You use prostitutes because you are incapable of getting action otherwise; despite the significant advantage of being 'rich'.

* Violet would totally use prostitutes if she was 'rich' rich.

Nothing wrong with paying solid money for a premium service by a professional

Cato says Nice try. You use prostitutes because you are incapable of getting action otherwise; despite the significant advantage of being 'rich'.


Er...no.. Its like saying I have a cleaner because I am incapable of cleaning my own house, I eat in restaurants because I am incapable of cooking

I like to have sex like others like restaurants. I like variety. I like the services of skilled workers and I like beauty. Most people can't cook some of the stuff that I like'.Most of all I like to pay the Check and leave leaving someone else to bus my table and wash up.

I also go to Restaurants

I also have a Housemaid

I also feel sorry for you that you need to insult people who have done nothing to you.

What is so odd about being rich that you need to put it in reported speech?

---

Violet - No I don't live near Texas. I am about as far from Texas as it is possible to be.

You like Oblivion too.

What a pity we could play Skyrim together.

Super Kudos to you

(September 7, 2012 at 10:37 pm)Polaris Wrote: No. It should not be legal because it victimizes women. I like how some Western Europeans countries handle issues of prostitution....unlike America where the police go after the prostitutes, they instead go after the scumbags looking to have sex with prostitutes.

No, pimps victimize women, especially pimps who abduct women and force them to work as prostitutes. Women who choose to work as prostitutes aren't victims; they are making a choice.

(September 8, 2012 at 1:28 am)cato123 Wrote: Nice try. You use prostitutes because you are incapable of getting action otherwise; despite the significant advantage of being 'rich'.

If he had the 'significant advantage of being rich' then surely the people who sleep with him for this advantage are only sleeping with him for money?

They are in effect, prostitutes.



Your point seems mute.

(September 8, 2012 at 8:21 am)Tiberius Wrote: Women who choose to work as prostitutes aren't victims; they are making a choice.

Some might even say they are entrepreneurs. Why oh why are we not taxing this and drugs?

(September 8, 2012 at 10:16 am)whateverist Wrote: Some might even say they are entrepreneurs. Why oh why are we not taxing this and drugs?

Sex and dwugs are bad.

(September 8, 2012 at 10:16 am)whateverist Wrote:

(September 8, 2012 at 8:21 am)Tiberius Wrote: Women who choose to work as prostitutes aren't victims; they are making a choice.

Some might even say they are entrepreneurs. Why oh why are we not taxing this and drugs?

Because then the politicians and pastors would all have to pay tax.

(September 8, 2012 at 10:19 am)Napoléon Wrote:

(September 8, 2012 at 10:16 am)whateverist Wrote: Some might even say they are entrepreneurs. Why oh why are we not taxing this and drugs?

Sex and dwugs are bad.

Duh, that's part of what makes them so gooood.

(August 19, 2012 at 1:28 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Should prostitution be legal?

It is. They call it marriage.

I voted yes.

(September 8, 2012 at 8:21 am)Tiberius Wrote: pimps victimize women

Not all pimps.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkJjWOYvyTY