Signed. And I'm putting it on facebook, too. Most of my friends list is queer, so that should be a lot of signatures.

Also, I'm pro-choice, too, so I highly doubt I'd be signing a petition to prevent abortion.

(September 25, 2012 at 11:53 pm)Blackrook Wrote: Live and let live?

Will you sign my petition to stop abortion?

This means that you will gladly sign a petition declaring a moratorium on international conflicts always resulting in young peoples deaths, not quite as young as the unborn, but still a worth cause. Notice that I avoided the word WAR. Something that hasn't legally been declared since WWII. Will you support this?

Less than zero = sanctified life. Greater than 18 = the same coward bastards that sanctified my non-existence get to increase my cross section for bullet absorbtion before I am legally allowed to drink a beer. Fucking idiots.

(September 26, 2012 at 12:27 am)Blackrook Wrote: Well, don't say live and let live if you're in favor of abortion. It makes you a hypocrite.

I'm not in favor of abortion. Who is? What kind of twisted fuckstick would be in favor of abortion? I said I was pro-choice, which means that I support a woman's right to choose, and to make decisions in favor of her own life, which I value... which we all should value. That is the epitome of "live and let live".

Being "pro-life" is more than being against abortion. Being anti-abortion means that you're pro-fetuses, it doesn't make you righteous, compassionate, or holy. It makes you a hypocrite to say you're "pro-life", when you're really just anti-abortion, because the women having these abortions have lives too. Whatever their reasons for terminating their pregnancies, it's none of your fucking business because it isn't your life.

I had my abortion to save my life, so I could be a mother for my children who are already born. Like I said, go fuck yourself.

Quote:Will you sign my petition to stop abortion?

No. We need many more abortions. Particularly in backward, catholic-dominated countries.

Well, I don't know what you mean by "civil rights", but if there are laws, all people ought to receive equal treatment by them. Homosexuals have the right to protection, property, home and etc. like other people. Live and let live. Obviously it's quite unlawful, and anarchistic to call upon public violent reaction towards any minority. But this does not mean that minorities ought to dictate the majority what they ought to allow, or what they ought to legalize!

38,366 letters sent so far.

All my hopes

(September 26, 2012 at 5:55 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, I don't know what you mean by "civil rights", but if there are laws, all people ought to receive equal treatment by them. Homosexuals have the right to protection, property, home and etc. like other people. Live and let live. Obviously it's quite unlawful, and anarchistic to call upon public violent reaction towards any minority. But this does not mean that minorities ought to dictate the majority what they ought to allow, or what they ought to legalize!

Even when that minority is just asking for the same rights that everyone enjoys as a matter of course?

mehmet isn't humane Zen

(September 26, 2012 at 6:24 am)Zen Badger Wrote:

(September 26, 2012 at 5:55 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, I don't know what you mean by "civil rights", but if there are laws, all people ought to receive equal treatment by them. Homosexuals have the right to protection, property, home and etc. like other people. Live and let live. Obviously it's quite unlawful, and anarchistic to call upon public violent reaction towards any minority. But this does not mean that minorities ought to dictate the majority what they ought to allow, or what they ought to legalize!

Even when that minority is just asking for the same rights that everyone enjoys as a matter of course?

Minorities sometimes have different rights than "everyone", friend.
But they have the rights that the majority gives to them.
Asking for same rights and privilages...Well, whatever the constitution gives to the citizens of that country, with minorities being citizens aswell, they too have access to these rights, obviously.
But dealing with minorities is a very risky business, especially if you have many different minorities, ethnic, religious or otherwise, for homosexuals...Well, they are both a minority, and none at the same time. For they also constitute the part of a majority or another minority somewhere, but form a "minority" of their own somewhere else. So what kind of minority rights or privilages do they deserve for just being homosexual? I believe they deserve none whatsoever.

(September 26, 2012 at 6:32 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:

(September 26, 2012 at 6:24 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Even when that minority is just asking for the same rights that everyone enjoys as a matter of course?

Minorities sometimes have different rights than "everyone", friend.
But they have the rights that the majority gives to them.
Asking for same rights and privilages...Well, whatever the constitution gives to the citizens of that country, with minorities being citizens aswell, they too have access to these rights, obviously.
But dealing with minorities is a very risky business, especially if you have many different minorities, ethnic, religious or otherwise, for homosexuals...Well, they are both a minority, and none at the same time. For they also constitute the part of a majority or another minority somewhere, but form a "minority" of their own somewhere else. So what kind of minority rights or privilages do they deserve for just being homosexual? I believe they deserve none whatsoever.

Very true, they don't deserve special minority rights.

But they're not asking for special rights are they?

They're just asking for the same rights that the majority enjoy.