(January 30, 2013 at 12:40 am)Drich Wrote: It is better to keep ones mouth closed and have others wonder if he is a fool. Than to open it, and prove everyone right.

This is only proof that you are incapable of taking your own advice.

(January 31, 2013 at 5:22 pm)Drich Wrote: lables, and 'rewards' aside, I'm here for you cinny.

Well Drichead, none of that last response deserves consideration. It was tantamount to you saying, "nuh uh," and then complaining about issues that you have created in your head. On behalf of everyone who occasionally reads your grammatically disastrous posts full of incorrect terms accompanied by your own special definitions --- please take that fortune cookie of yours, unwrap it, bend over and shove it up your ass so that we don't have to hear you talk ... or do you also lack the education to know not to talk when your mouth is full?



You accuse me of logical fallacies, including an appeal to probability and then back yourself up with a link. Seriously?! You piece of dirt.





If Jesus doesn't spit in your face for the reputation you've left him its only because he's dead.

(February 1, 2013 at 10:36 am)Drich Wrote:

(January 31, 2013 at 7:06 pm)Cinjin Wrote: You accuse me of logical fallacies, including an appeal to probability and then back yourself up with a link. Seriously?! You piece of dirt.

I had to leave a link because it was apparent by your last post that you did not recognize that an appeal to probability or a sweeping generalization was even a logical fallacy. If you care to think back to my original statement, I said your constant attacks on my lack of a formal education was the appeal to probability. Supposedly Because I did not meet this superficial standard of yours, that nothing I could say could be taken seriously. Upon the conclusion of this fallacy you make a sweeping generalization attempting to dismiss everything I have said. However in doing so you have only proved your own intellectual dishonesty. The fact the you continue to press your points based on these fallacies, Now that I have eliminated any claims to ignorance you may have to them, your intellectual integrity can be legitmatly called into question. Because Your line of reasoning has been weighed, measured and found wanting, by your own standards.

meh, I told you exactly why I wouldn't respond to you. I've answered your posts dozens of times and your response is always the same: greasy rhetoric and blatant contradictions followed by your own denial. That is not a person who deserves legitimate responses.
Oh and by the way, if you conducted yourself by what you call "my own standards," you wouldn't even be here ... the same way I don't hang out on christian sites claiming to do "work" and purposefully inflaming others into anger.

You can quote me on this ... you are the poster child for everything that is wrong with Christianity. Your "faith" is useless, as it has only been used to inspire hatred and contempt.

(February 1, 2013 at 5:03 pm)Cinjin Wrote: meh, I told you exactly why I wouldn't respond to you. I've answered your posts dozens of times and your response is always the same: greasy rhetoric and blatant contradictions followed by your own denial. That is not a person who deserves legitimate responses.
Oh and by the way, if you conducted yourself by what you call "my own standards," you wouldn't even be here ... The same way I don't hang out on Christian sites claiming to do "work" and purposefully inflaming others into anger.

You can quote me on this ... You are the poster child for everything that is wrong with Christianity. Your "faith" is useless, as it has only been used to inspire hatred and contempt.

Take some responsibility for yourself, and your own actions. My 'responses' to you are unique to you. My 'work' here is not centered around the singular purpose to provoke people to wrath. Even so, as you can plainly see I have no difficulty doing so if you wish to lead the conversation in that direction. My efforts have always and carefully matched the person I am working with. If you want to posture and be a bully, then know i can do the same. If you want to try and intimidate and point to my weaknesses then if continually provoked, I can do the same. But if you want to have a respectable discourse where you are willing to question what you believe, then again I can do the same. In short if You do not like how I come across then it's time to look at your own efforts. Rather than blaming others for your own failings.

That's not to say you will always agree with what I say nor does it mean you can't get emotionally charged because I have confronted or dismissed or confirm an image or understanding of God/religion that you may have. As I have said people tend to engrain themselves in what they believe, to challenge that belief is to challenge them personally. Which brings us back to my reasons for presenting myself honestly and openly. For if you personally wish to dismiss me or my work because I can not spell, then you are free to do so, if you need the occasional way out as a way to save face, then know that is what it is there for.

That said if you wish to start a spell check campaign, and try to bully me into a corner or shame me from my work here, then understand I reserve the right to turn these very same efforts back onto you.
Because in doing so I am still teaching. In that for the way you judge others will be used to judge you. That is why I told you by your own standard you have been weighed, measured and found wanting. Your standards (or appeal to my lack of a formal education) seems to be a place where you are lacking as well.

(February 1, 2013 at 8:03 pm)Drich Wrote: Take some responsibility for yourself, and your own actions.

Totaly off-subject... But this sentiment is why I cannot accept a sacrifice for my "sins"...

Search scripture for your Biblical proof of this concept...
.

(February 1, 2013 at 8:12 pm)catfish Wrote:

(February 1, 2013 at 8:03 pm)Drich Wrote: Take some responsibility for yourself, and your own actions.

Totaly off-subject... But this sentiment is why I cannot accept a sacrifice for my "sins"...

You were "designed" to sin Catfish. Well, unless the "designer" failed so badly.
Your brain rewards you for "good" behavior with a dose of chemicals to make you feel good. Our body gives us pain when when we do something "bad."
So why didn't god "program in" all the rules of the bible into our sensory preceptors? Why doesn't praying give us a string of orgasms stronger than sex? Doesn't god want us to praise him more than he wants us to produce?
Why doesn't sex with a one night stand hurt like kicks to the crotch? Doesn't the "designer" want us not to sin? We can have free will and have built in pain/pleasure sensors. I would not consider it a violation of my free will to have peppers burn my mouth despite my desire to eat them, do you?