"Dr." Hovind refuted
February 19, 2013 at 3:12 am
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2013 at 3:17 am by FallentoReason.)
I'm not one to debate on Facebook what I debate on here. It just so happens that I commented on a friend's post which was mildly about religion and before I know it I've got Christians spewing forth their baseless creationist arguments against me. One guy in particular kept flinging arguments at me such as these:
After doing 5 minutes of googling and finding the evidence and crunching numbers for him, it was blatantly obvious that he hadn't thought anything through. This was especially obvious with the last point I've outlined. If we actually crunch the numbers it turns out that if the moon had started at the Roche Limit (the closest point from Earth where the moon's orbit would still be functional) and made its way to where it is now, it would have taken 9.15 billion years. That's the upper bound which means in theory the moon started somewhere between the Roche Limit and where it is now. 10 000 year old Earth? Nowhere to be found.
Anyways, it seems like he was relaying to me the laughable arguments of a certain "Dr." Hovind who, according to Wikipedia, has 3 degrees in Christian education from unaccredited institutions, uses Creationist arguments that his father taught him & his major paper where all these arguments have come from hardly ever cites where he's gotten his data/information from. A shocking effort by someone who supposedly has a PhD.
I basically just wanted to link you guys to a website that refutes all these sorts of arguments (which you might have heard before). It's a nice little resource to quickly whip out on the uneducated or simply blind to basic scientific knowledge:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood.html
To top it all off, this guy is currently serving 10 years at a medium security prison for not paying his taxes. The Bible should be read literally, eh? This guy is the definition of irony. Absolutely disgraceful.
- Human footprints have been found next to dinosaur footprints
- Carbon dating doesn't work because of A, B & C
- The moon should be covered in kilometres of dust if it's 4.5 billion years old
- If we use the rate at which the moon is moving away from us and "reverse" time, the moon would crash against earth (if they are 4.5 billion years old)
After doing 5 minutes of googling and finding the evidence and crunching numbers for him, it was blatantly obvious that he hadn't thought anything through. This was especially obvious with the last point I've outlined. If we actually crunch the numbers it turns out that if the moon had started at the Roche Limit (the closest point from Earth where the moon's orbit would still be functional) and made its way to where it is now, it would have taken 9.15 billion years. That's the upper bound which means in theory the moon started somewhere between the Roche Limit and where it is now. 10 000 year old Earth? Nowhere to be found.
Anyways, it seems like he was relaying to me the laughable arguments of a certain "Dr." Hovind who, according to Wikipedia, has 3 degrees in Christian education from unaccredited institutions, uses Creationist arguments that his father taught him & his major paper where all these arguments have come from hardly ever cites where he's gotten his data/information from. A shocking effort by someone who supposedly has a PhD.
I basically just wanted to link you guys to a website that refutes all these sorts of arguments (which you might have heard before). It's a nice little resource to quickly whip out on the uneducated or simply blind to basic scientific knowledge:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood.html
To top it all off, this guy is currently serving 10 years at a medium security prison for not paying his taxes. The Bible should be read literally, eh? This guy is the definition of irony. Absolutely disgraceful.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle