Normally, I get insulted when I'm called "morally worthless," but considering the source, I'm equally insulted as when being called a "poo-poo head" by a five year old.

Liberals are empty because they force others to accept their social programs and vision while having no ethical justification for what they advocate that is equally authoritative as its negation.


That was not an insult, it is true. Liberalism does not have any unifying ethical teaching that gives liberal beliefs authority, they only have statements like "The greatest good for the greatest number", political tools useful for manipulative politicians to exert control over others.

The fact that there is no authority or requirement for anyone to obey the philosophy the state law is built on except force only serves to strengthen the wills of the politicians who make up empty phrase after empty phrase to justify their nihilistic worldview.

---

RE: Morally worthless, was not meaning to insult, only to educate. If you are a moral relativist, or a nihilist, you are morally worthless, because your beliefs don't have any validity or authority, therefore they are morally worthless.

This is not an insult, it is common sense. To do good to someone else means nothing when you do not know what good is.

More nonsense from the five year old.

Of course the issue of how doing good from the perspective of moral relativism has any meaning (hence "morally worthless") will not be broached, only insults. How adult like.


The Biblical concept of "fool" obviously and clearly describes the moral relativist.

You seem to think you have said anything that was worthy of anything but insults.

Has he said anything that was anything but insults?

“Why is it that whenever someone says 'with all due respect' they really mean 'kiss my ass'?” --Ashley Williams, Mass Effect

(April 9, 2013 at 5:17 pm)jstrodel Wrote: Of course the issue of how doing good from the perspective of moral relativism has any meaning (hence "morally worthless") will not be broached, only insults. How adult like.


The Biblical concept of "fool" obviously and clearly describes the moral relativist.

Though I am sure you have been asked this question many, many times, I have to ask for myself.

What exactly are you doing on this forum?

You obviously share none of the views or opinions with anyone else.

(April 9, 2013 at 9:04 pm)Brayton.l Wrote: Though I am sure you have been asked this question many, many times, I have to ask for myself.

What exactly are you doing on this forum?

You obviously share none of the views or opinions with anyone else.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-17958-po...#pid423939

(April 9, 2013 at 9:08 pm)Darkstar Wrote:

(April 9, 2013 at 9:04 pm)Brayton.l Wrote: Though I am sure you have been asked this question many, many times, I have to ask for myself.

What exactly are you doing on this forum?

You obviously share none of the views or opinions with anyone else.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-17958-po...#pid423939

I don't believe ONE word of that.

Quote:I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.
Susan B. Anthony

Either way, my time is more valuable than this. Bye Strodel.