(January 7, 2014 at 10:31 am)enrico Wrote:

(January 6, 2014 at 10:26 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: I understand your belief here, but it's not really answering my question. What has this belief got to do with intuitional science? I hear your conclusion, I want to know how you arrived at it. Is intuitional science the method through which this model of spinal function was discovered?
Let me put it another way. Let's say I wanted to test, oh don't know, homeopathy. Science offers a method for doing this (generate a falsifiable hypothesis and experimentally test it). How would intuitional science go about establishing if homeopathy was genuinely effective or merely woo?

You need a guru first of all.
The real guru or teacher is God but here we enter a complex philosophical argument that at the moment i do not want to enter.
The teacher explain you how the system works and in order to enter that world you got to put the teaching into practice.
As i just explained in a previous post when a drop of water enter the ocean it loose her identity and become the ocean itself so it assume the ocean identity.
At this stage all the truth is there.
.

So in order to apply intuitional science one must fund a guru to teach one how to apply it. That's fair enough. It stands to reason that it is good to learn any method from a gifted teacher. Beyond the basics, traditional science generally needs to be taught, unless the student is truly exceptional.

However I'm just trying to get a broad idea for how the investigative system of intuitive science works. You know, like the rough syllabus of the course or an overview of the method. I've given you an approximate definition of the scientific method (develop a falsifiable hypothesis and design an experiment to test it), without the need to go into the intricacies of statistical analysis, experimental design etc (for which I'd suggest you should undertake an academic qualification).

You've given us a conclusion reached via intuitional science (the whole spine pipe thing) but not really an idea of how this conclusion was reached. Granted that I would need a guru to learn how to practice it, can you give me a broad overview of the intuitional scientific method?

(January 7, 2014 at 10:31 am)enrico Wrote: I really did not expect any intelligent comment from you so i get the usual garbage.
Now all drop of water enter the ocean and become one with the ocean so why wouldn't they feel that they are one with the ocean.
They certainly will feel that the truth is one and no diversity are possible so by practicing the same science it is obvious that everybody will end up in the same place and the truth is only one.
Only one imbecile would think otherwise.

I'm going to have to teach you something apparently nobody has before: the universe doesn't owe you anything, and will not bend itself to fit your opinions. Convincing yourself that what you think is some cosmic gift does not make it so. You are not as inspired as you think you are.

Without evidence, there is no difference between you, and any other peddler of woo.

Hey rico, how do you distinguish your waves and other experiences from an LSD trip or something involving an altered mental state?

I would just like to point out that enrico has ignored me again....

Yeah I'm ignoring you as well....


DAMN

That's blown that streak

Intuitional science in three easy steps:

1. do something;
2. if it feels good, do it again;
3. Claim to have discovered a great truth.

---

(January 7, 2014 at 9:42 am)enrico Wrote: rasetsu



After coming up with the pretence that you are a yogini (it made me feel like vomiting) now you are manipulate my sentences.
It just show your low degree of consciousness.
Wonder why Stimbo gave you a kudos when he said that he does not like manipulations.

I know I've struck home when somebody is so offended by what I wrote (or in this case, parodied) that they omit all but a word or two in quoting me. Truth hurts, don't it? I notice you didn't actually respond to the point of my manipulations, that all this stuff about kundalini and the spine and "glands that control ejaculation" is just flummox dredged out of religious dogma. It's not true according to western science, it's not even true according to scientists practicing in India or Australia. Such claims have one source and one source only: religious dogma. Or perhaps you can explain how the existence of kundalini at the base of the spine was discovered and demonstrated to exist?

Oh, and I am a yogini. I've presented just as much evidence for that, as you've provided for intuitional science, which is to say none. So why the double standard for evidence?

Quote:Intuitional science in three easy steps:

1. do something;
2. if it feels good, do it again;
3. Claim to have discovered a great truth.

Is there more to the process than this enrico?

(January 7, 2014 at 9:42 am)enrico Wrote: After coming up with the pretence that you are a yogini

Whenever I hear enrico say things like this, I mentally edit the sentence to read thus:

"I don't know you, your name, your life, or anything about you, but I have decided I know more about what you think and do than you do."

Jacob Wrote:Is there more to the process than this enrico?

4. Convince yourself that the source of the thing you did was a magic spirit doodad.
5. Refuse to ever believe it could be anything other than the magic spirit doodad.
6. Take the thing you did as proof of the objectivity of the magic spirit doodad, because without the magic spirit doodad you could not have experienced the thing, and the thing is proof of the magic spirit doodad.
7. Be an obnoxious ass online.
8.

(January 7, 2014 at 9:42 am)enrico Wrote: 1) We are talking about an ABSTRACT pipe Stimbo.
2) How would you know that the spinal cord is not a pipe?
3) Who said that you have to drop a length of pipe in the shitter when i said that the pipe need only to be cleaned?

1) I know and I don't care. If you want to get off on abstractions - i.e. made up stuff - you might as well call it a fucking baseball bat or a banana or something equally absurd.
2) Because it's not. It really isn't.
3) I didn't say pipe; I used the term 'length of dirty spine'. I was taking the piss.

(January 7, 2014 at 9:42 am)enrico Wrote: Ok. i understand that you may have had an hard day but next time be a bit more observant.

Arrogant cunt.

(January 7, 2014 at 10:45 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: So in order to apply intuitional science one must fund a guru to teach one how to apply it. That's fair enough. It stands to reason that it is good to learn any method from a gifted teacher. Beyond the basics, traditional science generally needs to be taught, unless the student is truly exceptional. However I'm just trying to get a broad idea for how the investigative system of intuitive science works. You know, like the rough syllabus of the course or an overview of the method. I've given you an approximate definition of the scientific method (develop a falsifiable hypothesis and design an experiment to test it), without the need to go into the intricacies of statistical analysis, experimental design etc (for which I'd suggest you should undertake an academic qualification). You've given us a conclusion reached via intuitional science (the whole spine pipe thing) but not really an idea of how this conclusion was reached. Granted that I would need a guru to learn how to practice it, can you give me a broad overview of the intuitional scientific method?

The teacher say that along your spine there is an astral pipe or susumma
running vertical through the body and along this you got so many glands that control some particular part of the body, mind and consciousness especially 7 main glands with the pituary and pineal the most important.
How do you know that the teacher tell you the truth.
It is by practicing tantric yoga that you come to the same conclusion.
As you work on these glands you feel them more and more active and the area around more bright so they got to be there.
How tantra yoga or intuitional science works?
If the pipe is not blocked you don't have to do anything but if this would be the case you would be God.
Considering that human life evolve from lower form of consciousness (mineral, vegetable, animal life) and that we have not yet reach human emancipation (become one with God) then it is clear that the pipe is not yet unblocked and therefore our wavelength is not yet straight.
If it is not straight the cosmic flow is not felt or is felt in part according to our own progress.
The kundalini or vital force lie at the very bottom of the spinal cord and in order to come to the top into the pineal gland the astral pipe must be straight.
Like a lift or elevator that can only come up if the space inside the wall run straight also the kundalini can come up if the astral pipe run straight.
How do you make it straight?
By working on the cakras or glands you can and this involve total concentration on these cakras and a sound or mantra but most important is the ideation that you are GOD.
G generator
O operator
D destroyer