(January 2, 2015 at 3:07 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: //
My opinion about soul mates has no bearing on the meaning of the word bastard.

So you are a legalist then, in which only the marriage document has something to say and never mind the reason why the document is there.

(January 2, 2015 at 3:10 am)Chili Wrote: Sorry, I can add here that if the thousand year reign is already in our midst that would be true only if our heritage is very similar so that lovers can unite in this similarity, for which then religion it tradition based and not dependent on the number of bible passages we read. Then if you read that some of the ancients were close to 1000 years old, that would mean they could read their own soul nature back in history that far.

From this would follow that a bastard child in our recent history would be a dead-end right there, and this idea is presented in Luke someplace where Jesus rattled of his own lineage past all the ancients, past Adam and right back to God is first person in him.

Are you retarded, or something? Soft in the skull? Get dropped on your head by your soul-mate parents? Did you just happen to huff too much WD40 in your youth? Maybe your mom drank a lot of communion wine while she was pregnant with you?

Because your trains of thought are going everywhere and yet, remarkably, nowhere at all. They're all departing, but when I look at the schedule board, there's no destinations listed; they're just labeled as "departing."

If none of those afflictions I inquired into are the case, then stop huffing the whippits and say something coherent. The things I've read so far from you would make a twelve-year-old laugh at their random silliness, and that's ALL you seem to be writing, too.

Ease off the sauce, or the huffing, or whatever intoxicant you're subjecting yourself to, take a few minutes to actually formulate a fucking coherent position, and don't say anything more until you do. That, or take your fucking antipsychotics for your schizophrenia. Either way, get coherent, or get going.

Creed, I was about to rage at you for being too over-the-top rude. . . forum rules and all that.

Then I read what Chili wrote.

(January 2, 2015 at 3:17 am)Minimalist Wrote: I think this one has been hitting the communion wine a little too hard.

I'm hoping he'll finish the bottle and start making some goddamn sense.

(January 1, 2015 at 5:12 pm)Chili Wrote:

(January 1, 2015 at 4:53 pm)abaris Wrote: How exactly? How is life conceived without the ingredients necessary? I mean, sperm and egg meeting is kind of a requirement. And the sperm alone, as you seem to believe, doesn't do anything.

How exactly is not mine to say, but if the sperm has independent life simple logic would tell me that life is created ex-nihilo in the conscious mind of the male to be conceived in the nucleus of the atom that in its turn is received to form the living sperm.

Sorry I am not sure why I am into this, but I found the "rant on gender stereotypes" an interesting topic because I see our modern "gender equal" society not very productive in the procreation side of life.

Life is created in the conscious mind of the man who provides the sperm to form the life which he has already created in his mind?
Woah that's deep.

(January 2, 2015 at 11:30 am)Losty Wrote: Life is created in the conscious mind of the man who provides the sperm to form the life which he has already created in his mind?
Woah that's deep.

Didn't you get the memo? Whenever a man faps on the floor his mind creates a baby.

(January 1, 2015 at 6:33 pm)Chili Wrote:

(January 1, 2015 at 5:39 pm)abaris Wrote: Do you understand the difference between fertile sperm and live sperm as in being alive? If sperm were alive, what's the purpose of a woman in your mind? Just the oven to bake the bread?

No, I do not really understand but I see them swimming and must penetrate the ovum, or what we would call egg that comes from the womb of man as woman in which lovers are said to be soul-mates. In opposite to this a one nigh stand is possible that would yield a bastard child with little or less self direction later in life, much like a Starbuck slave maybe.

Could it be right to say that this is where nature-nurture first begins?

Bravo, you had me fooled until this post. Very well done.

(January 2, 2015 at 11:30 am)Losty Wrote: Woah that's deep.

Yes, we're in deep s**t...

(January 2, 2015 at 3:10 am)Chili Wrote: Sorry, I can add here that if the thousand year reign is already in our midst that would be true only if our heritage is very similar so that lovers can unite in this similarity, for which then religion it tradition based and not dependent on the number of bible passages we read. Then if you read that some of the ancients were close to 1000 years old, that would mean they could read their own soul nature back in history that far.

From this would follow that a bastard child in our recent history would be a dead-end right there, and this idea is presented in Luke someplace where Jesus rattled of his own lineage past all the ancients, past Adam and right back to God is first person in him.

---

(January 2, 2015 at 3:21 am)Chili Wrote:

(January 2, 2015 at 3:07 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: //
My opinion about soul mates has no bearing on the meaning of the word bastard.

So you are a legalist then, in which only the marriage document has something to say and never mind the reason why the document is there.

No. Guess again.

(January 2, 2015 at 12:06 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:

(January 2, 2015 at 3:10 am)Chili Wrote: Sorry, I can add here that if the thousand year reign is already in our midst that would be true only if our heritage is very similar so that lovers can unite in this similarity, for which then religion it tradition based and not dependent on the number of bible passages we read. Then if you read that some of the ancients were close to 1000 years old, that would mean they could read their own soul nature back in history that far.

From this would follow that a bastard child in our recent history would be a dead-end right there, and this idea is presented in Luke someplace where Jesus rattled of his own lineage past all the ancients, past Adam and right back to God as first person in him.

---

(January 2, 2015 at 3:21 am)Chili Wrote: So you are a legalist then, in which only the marriage document has something to say and never mind the reason why the document is there.

No. Guess again.

Oh, it is a money thing maybe with regard to inheritance and financial support, and has nothing to do with inner direction that accounts for intuition as the seat of wisdom in us.

And do you not agree that intuition is the memory of our soul that contains our own lineage with a diminishing influence on us the farther back we go? This would be why the heavens are created in the plural and therefore is round in the singular, opposite which the world is created in the singular to be flat for humans as flatlanders there.

But sorry, I am ranting again, and I use the word farther as further in time that can be a thousand years in us, and I think that this is where Galileo was an apostle short to understand what I just wrote.

And actually, the Pope did say "for Catholics only" when he granted Galileo his wish to remain befuddled in unstructured space as flatlander still.