Fuxxake, guys, learn to post properly.

I originally posted a thoughtful rebuttal, but then remembered who we're talking too, so I didn't want to waste any further time.


My response is the same as it was 10+ pages back. Everyone can read through this thread and see for themselves the idiocy spewed onto it by nappy rash here. I don't need to respond to idiocy again having already responded, several times.

People can read from here if they want to see just how thick this guy is: http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-page-8.html

'Communism is secularism taken to the extreme.'

And everyone immediately stopped giving a fuck about anything he had to say.

'Communism is secularism taken to the extreme.'

What is it about that quote don't you understand? Are you saying it's impossible to go overboard with secularism? elaborate a little.

Keep in mind, you've already shown you have no clue what secularism is, seeing how you still believe Denmark is secular.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism

Quote:Secularism is the principle of the separation of government institutions and persons mandated to represent the state from religious institutions and religious dignitaries. One manifestation of secularism is asserting the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, or, in a state declared to be neutral on matters of belief, from the imposition by government of religion or religious practices upon its people. Another manifestation of secularism is the view that public activities and decisions, especially political ones, should be uninfluenced by religious beliefs and/or practices.

As you can see, there are different manifestations of secularism, the part in bold is the communist approach.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-page-8.html

(January 24, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:

---

http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-page-8.html

---

http://atheistforums.org/thread-3521.html

Quote:1. This is a discussion forum.
This means that members should interact with each other in a proper discussion, and not purposely / repeatedly evade rebuttals made to them. Whilst members are not forced or required to answer every post addressed to them, ignoring them all and continuing to post similar content will fall in line with our "No Spam" rule. This includes posting links / copy-pasted content / scripture verses repeatedly, without adding your own comments or being relevant to the thread.

Still dodging I see.. shocking
how about providing a rebuttal to my post like I've asked repetedly.

I might add, that's like the 4th time you posted that gif without bothering to respond.

Please refer to post 284 for my response.

And everytime you post further to me on this thread, please refer back to post 284 for my response.

I can't respond to you because its impossible to talk to someone who doesn't know what they're talking about and insists on acting like a pigeon on a chess board. Indeed you want to cite the rules to a moderator who helped write the rules? How's that working for you? You know I could report you for several posts you've made on here where you've lied about people's responses, misrepresented their posts and indeed not bothered to respond to rebuttals.

If you think I'm breaking the rules,report me, instead of acting like a little bitch when you get mad.

Hence why I keep referring people to the beginning of the conversation where you repeatedly embarrassed yourself over and over, and to which you continue to do so. It's much more fun to allow others to form a judgement about your idiocy.

(January 24, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:

http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-page-8.html

(January 24, 2015 at 1:20 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I might add, that's like the 4th time you posted that gif without bothering to respond.

It seems that you do not like his response and so just pretend it was never made.

You know as well as I do that the conversation has moved to the secularism of Denmark, and you contradicting yourself on what secularism is, to which you have not responded.

And to be clear, I quoted YOU from your own post, no need to go back read.

---

(January 24, 2015 at 1:32 pm)IATIA Wrote:

(January 24, 2015 at 1:20 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I might add, that's like the 4th time you posted that gif without bothering to respond.

It seems that you do not like his response and so just pretend it was never made.

You're talking about his link to page 8? if you haven't noticed were on page 29... he hasn't responded to anything.

Huggy: if you think I'm breaking the rules, instead of throwing a temper tantrum, report me.

Everyone else: post 284 will send you back in time to see how every accusation thrown at mine and others feet is utter fabrication, and how every argument he's made has been rebutted time and time again, by various posters over several themes.

(January 24, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:

http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-page-8.html

Not throwing a tantrum, just pointing out the hypocrisy.
considering i made this post on page 27, i hardly see how it's relevant to go back to page 8.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid848245

(January 16, 2015 at 11:53 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You're seriously delusional.
This is a clear example of the mindset of an atheist, If you won't accept that Denmark's government is in fact NOT secular which is easily provable, how are you going to even begin to discuss spiritual matters?

Your own quote (in bold for clarity)
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid835049

(January 3, 2015 at 8:58 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Secularism Gurantees what ive highlighted you suggest in the above post. It gives people the ability to chose a religion (or no-religion) without the state choosing for then. It prevents a state mandated religion from either existing or enforcing it's rules and dogmas on the body politic.

Now if that's not the 'freedom to chose' I don't know what is.

so according to YOU, secularism prevents a state mandated religion.
This link is taken from your own post.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid846133
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Denmark

Quote:Of all the religions in Denmark, the most prominent is Christianity in the form of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Denmark, the state religion.

Also according to YOU secularism "gives people the ability to chose a religion (or no-religion) without the state choosing for them"
This link is also taken from your exact same post
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid846133
http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/csrpl/rinv...enmark.htm

Quote: Let me briefly summarize what the State-church system implies:

• According to the constitution (§ 54), the Lutheran-evangelic Church is the Danish People’s Church (“Folkekirke”), and is, as such, supported by the State, which means that the Lutheran-evangelic religion and its institutions and churches are given a favored place among religions in Danish society. All tax-paying citizens, regardless of their personal religious beliefs, thus contribute to the priests and bishops of the “Folkekirke.”

• Practically all citizens are automatically born as members of the “Folkekirke.” Not to be so demands that the citizens take the initiative to leave the church. At present 83 percent of the Danish population belong to the “Folkekirke.”

Denmark, then, from one point of view is clearly a Christian country—as are by the same standards the other Scandinavian countries.

This amalgamates into what I for want of a better label would label a secularised Lutheranism as a dominant cosmology in Denmark. Although Denmark (and Sweden) is a country in which most of the citizens by tradition belong to the State church, Christianity as a religion does not characterize the life of any large segment of the population.

Need I go on?
Denmark clearly does not have separation between church and state, yet you fail to acknowledge your own evidence proving this fact.

You're contradicting yourself dude.

I can't wait to hear your next excuse....

If you notice, those are quotes taken from your own post, no need to go back and read, I took the time to find your definition of secularism and quote them along with the link.

as you can plainly see, you contradict yourself by claiming that Denmark is secular, I WANT YOU TO ADDRESS THE CONTRADICTION which you have not done, but avoid the issue like a child.

Just man up and admit you were wrong, I would have dropped it a long time ago.

Jeez