Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 9:50 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
JESUS < 69
#11
RE: JESUS < 69
(July 15, 2015 at 8:07 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote: He had OCD and a weird foot fetish. Always washing people's feet, that one...

[Image: BibleJohn13=5.jpg]
In Bible speak when a man is getting his "feet" washed it refers to his genitals.  There is not one passage in the Bible about any woman getting her feet washed by anyone.    The washing method might have involved blow jobs.
Reply
#12
RE: JESUS < 69
An odd take on 'blumkin'.

Hmmm . . .
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#13
RE: JESUS < 69
(July 16, 2015 at 6:58 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I am not surprised or disappointed by this post, considering who wrote it.

But since it was done for the sole purpose of mocking me personally (I know, I know. persecution complex, right?), I am surprised and disappointed by the person who kudosed it.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-34720.html

[Image: tumblr_lnbfgumge41qlh0w4o1_400.gif?w=700]
Reply
#14
RE: JESUS < 69
It was a parody sure, I wouldn't say it was mocking you. I didn't see any harmful intent. If there was, then I wouldn't have given kudos. I just thought it was funny!

If it was meant to be hurtful, then I would withdraw my kudos.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#15
RE: JESUS < 69
Cmon. It's all in good fun. Just a joke
Reply
#16
RE: JESUS < 69
[Image: 78728c92d2209f366e57ca6f1aa8a4ef73d40b75...876501.jpg]
Reply
#17
RE: JESUS < 69
Thanks Rob, you know I luv ya!

Love you too Neim, but I don't think it was in good fun.

Ya'll may be atheists, but you know very well that Jesus and our beliefs are things that are very sacred to us and close to our hearts. While I don't like to see stuff on this forum that makes fun of Jesus, I don't let it feel like a personal insult, because it isn't. This post, on the other hand, was personal and directed at me specifically. It was directly making fun of me personally in regards to something very sacred to me. You guys know that.

Like I said, not surprised or disappointed at the post itself because I have no ties with Kusa and don't consider him a friend, so I wouldn't expect him to not be so disrespectful to me. But to say this was done in "good fun" is a bit ridiculous. And since Rob has apologized, the only reason I am posting this is to simply object to the notion that it was harmless fun and had no mean intent whatsoever.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#18
RE: JESUS < 69
(July 17, 2015 at 2:20 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Thanks Rob, you know I luv ya!

Love you too Neim, but I don't think it was in good fun.

Ya'll may be atheists, but you know very well that Jesus and our beliefs are things that are very sacred to us and close to our hearts. While I don't like to see stuff on this forum that makes fun of Jesus, I don't let it feel like a personal insult, because it isn't. This post, on the other hand, was personal and directed at me specifically. It was directly making fun of me personally in regards to something very sacred to me. You guys know that.

Like I said, not surprised or disappointed at the post itself because I have no ties with Kusa and don't consider him a friend, so I wouldn't expect him to not be so disrespectful to me. But to say this was done in "good fun" is a bit ridiculous. And since Rob has apologized, the only reason I am posting this is to simply object to the notion that it was harmless fun and had no mean intent whatsoever.

I really think you're being overly touchy.
Reply
#19
JESUS < 69
It is harmless fun. How could I possibly harm you on the internet? I mean this is the fucking internet right?
Reply
#20
RE: JESUS < 69
Oh, and it's not mocking you. It's mocking your beliefs. Just sayin'.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  In Christianity, Does Jesus' Soul Have Anything To Do With Why Jesus Is God? JesusIsGod7 18 7179 October 7, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist
  Jesus the Spiritual Warrior vs Jesus the Sacrificial Lamb Dosaiah 8 7362 December 5, 2010 at 2:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)