Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 7:38 am
(This post was last modified: October 1, 2015 at 7:38 am by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(October 1, 2015 at 1:20 am)Losty Wrote: I'm also against seatbelt laws. I always wear mine and I would even if I wasn't legally required to but I don't think I should be legally required to.
Some people can be declared mentally incompetent and then someone else can make decisions for them. If they don't qualify as mentally incompetent they should get to make their own choices even if they make terrible choices.
Same way with motorcycling. It infuriates me when people talk about the expense of paying taxes to keep us on life support, so motorcyclists should be required by law to wear helmets. That said, I always ride in full, armored leathers, steeltoed boots, gloves, and helmet. Why? Because I like my skin.
We have states that do and that don't have helmet laws. Can anyone point me to the wards overflowing with bikers on life support, in the latter group of states? Anyone?
It's an asshole argument. "I don't want to pay for __ (insert imaginary outcome here)__ therefore I will impose this odious government intrusion onto you, since you cannot make decisions for yourself and need a nanny".
It is interesting to note, here, how many rights stem from the fundamental principle of a right to bodily integrity and choice. Once you accept that the government can control your body and your personal decisions...
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 10:08 am
(October 1, 2015 at 2:31 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: (October 1, 2015 at 12:03 am)vorlon13 Wrote: My Thetans kicked your Jedi shits to the curb 77 million years ago !!
LOLOLOL TRY 75 MILLION YEARS DIPSHIT! Shouldn't be surprised, Xenuists don't know shit about their own religion.
Why were Xenu's spaceships shaped like aeroplanes? Aerodynamics won't help when you're flying through space, moron, you can't propel a fucking airliner into orbit! This isn't rocket science. oh wait yes it is you're an idiot.
You know Palpatine was a Xenuist and the Galactic Empire's Anti-Jedite propaganda was endorsed by Xenuism, objective logical proof of that you support Order 66 you can deny it all you want and that only proves my true facts! I bet psychologists shouldn't be allowed to get married! you irrational bigot if I was president, I'd have every one of intolerant shits thrown into a live volcano! You wouldn't believe all that xenu bullshit if your mom hadn't made you a retard by drinking while she was pregnant, if you were objectively rational like I am and not objectively stupid like I prooved with evidence, you'd admit how obvious science is!
Science is true. Evolution is the basis of human morality and Darwin is a scientific fact.
DEAL WITH IT.
It's "XE MU" you twit !!!
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 8709
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 12:48 pm
(October 1, 2015 at 7:38 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: (October 1, 2015 at 1:20 am)Losty Wrote: I'm also against seatbelt laws. I always wear mine and I would even if I wasn't legally required to but I don't think I should be legally required to.
Some people can be declared mentally incompetent and then someone else can make decisions for them. If they don't qualify as mentally incompetent they should get to make their own choices even if they make terrible choices.
Same way with motorcycling. It infuriates me when people talk about the expense of paying taxes to keep us on life support, so motorcyclists should be required by law to wear helmets. That said, I always ride in full, armored leathers, steeltoed boots, gloves, and helmet. Why? Because I like my skin.
We have states that do and that don't have helmet laws. Can anyone point me to the wards overflowing with bikers on life support, in the latter group of states? Anyone?
It's an asshole argument. "I don't want to pay for __(insert imaginary outcome here)__ therefore I will impose this odious government intrusion onto you, since you cannot make decisions for yourself and need a nanny".
It is interesting to note, here, how many rights stem from the fundamental principle of a right to bodily integrity and choice. Once you accept that the government can control your body and your personal decisions...
Like the right to life?
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 1:41 pm
(October 1, 2015 at 12:48 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: (October 1, 2015 at 7:38 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Same way with motorcycling. It infuriates me when people talk about the expense of paying taxes to keep us on life support, so motorcyclists should be required by law to wear helmets. That said, I always ride in full, armored leathers, steeltoed boots, gloves, and helmet. Why? Because I like my skin.
We have states that do and that don't have helmet laws. Can anyone point me to the wards overflowing with bikers on life support, in the latter group of states? Anyone?
It's an asshole argument. "I don't want to pay for __(insert imaginary outcome here)__ therefore I will impose this odious government intrusion onto you, since you cannot make decisions for yourself and need a nanny".
It is interesting to note, here, how many rights stem from the fundamental principle of a right to bodily integrity and choice. Once you accept that the government can control your body and your personal decisions...
Like the right to life?
Exactly the opposite of that, actually. The right to not tell me I must use my body to create life.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 8709
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 2:02 pm
And if you have already voluntarily used your body in a way known to create life and a life is created then what?
Posts: 28384
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 2:10 pm
ChadWooters we have talked this subject to death. If you really want to discuss it, feel free to read back through what's already been said and come up with a new point.
Why would you expect someone to answer a question where it seems like you're intentionally not saying exactly what you mean?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 3101
Threads: 10
Joined: September 7, 2015
Reputation:
49
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 2:43 pm
Yes, I'm curious to hear the explanation by the celibacy and blood-god cult member explain to me why a civilized person must be abstinent or else reproduce. It's like saying, "You voluntarily ate that food. You know that food-borne illnesses can happen, and so you volunteered to die of ptomaine poisoning. If you didn't want ptomaine poisoning, you should have remained hungry."
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Posts: 8709
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 3:30 pm
(This post was last modified: October 1, 2015 at 3:33 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(October 1, 2015 at 2:43 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Yes, I'm curious to hear the explanation by the celibacy and blood-god cult member explain to me why a civilized person must be abstinent or else reproduce. It's like saying, "You voluntarily ate that food. You know that food-borne illnesses can happen, and so you volunteered to die of ptomaine poisoning. If you didn't want ptomaine poisoning, you should have remained hungry."
Rocket, in all honesty I don't think you really believe that is a fair analogy. People die when they do not eat. No one dies for lack of sexual intercourse. And really? "celibacy and blood-god cult member?" As for what a civilized person does, that depends on their inclinations and what they hope to achieve in life, but I don't consider promiscuity or serial monogamy civilized. Besides why must you always compare pregnancy, which is a normal and healthy condition, with some pathology?
Posts: 8709
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 3:32 pm
(This post was last modified: October 1, 2015 at 3:33 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
delete
Posts: 28384
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians
October 1, 2015 at 3:32 pm
So having sex is uncivilized?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
|
