Posts: 1994
Threads: 161
Joined: August 17, 2010
Reputation:
29
Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 7:41 am
I do not want to have a debate on wither Jesus of Nazareth existed. My opinion along with biblical scholars (even sceptical ones such as Bart D Ehrman) that there was a historical Jesus of Nazareth.
However I may propose a hypothesis for a naturalistic explanation for the belief, that the he followers of Jesus had that Jesus had been resurrected from the dead. There is a well documented psychological phenomena which is called bereavement hallucinations. Bereavement hallucinations are hallucinations which loved ones of a recent deceased person experience of that deceased person. These hallucinations are so vivid that they often report seeing or hearing the departed person in some familiar environment, being visited in their dreams, or having conversations with them while being completely awake.
This is quite a plausible explanation, especially given what Paul of Tarsus has to say about the beliefs of the first followers of Jesus. This is assuming Paul has received this from other followers of Jesus as opposed to inventing them himself.
1 Corinthians 15:3-9
Quote:For I handed on to you as of first importance what I in turn had received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to someone untimely born, he appeared also to me. For I am the least of the apostles, unfit to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
undefined
Posts: 736
Threads: 29
Joined: September 8, 2010
Reputation:
10
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 8:07 am
How is that an explanation if hundreds saw him?
Posts: 345
Threads: 29
Joined: March 20, 2010
Reputation:
6
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 9:40 am
(February 14, 2011 at 8:07 am)Skipper Wrote: How is that an explanation if hundreds saw him?
Exactly, i agree. i JUST read an article saying that the probability of such an event are even lower than a "miraculous" event (such as a terminal cancer being cured in a day, etc), which means that it is even less likely than the Resurrection itself
Posts: 12227
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 10:00 am
(February 14, 2011 at 9:40 am)Rwandrall Wrote: (February 14, 2011 at 8:07 am)Skipper Wrote: How is that an explanation if hundreds saw him?
Exactly, i agree. i JUST read an article saying that the probability of such an event are even lower than a "miraculous" event (such as a terminal cancer being cured in a day, etc), which means that it is even less likely than the Resurrection itself
Maybe if one of those who was having a bereavament hallucination was in the audience and somehow managed to convince everybody else in the crowd that he was there. At least, that's the best explanation of what happened at Fatima.
Or else that particular anecdote was bullshit.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 10:16 am
How about something even simpler?
Assuming Jesus existed and he was crucified, it's still not improbable that stories of his resurrection surfaced among the faithful. How many Elvis fans in the 20th century believed that he was still alive? These people lived in a primitive and superstitious time, when people thought that demons caused illnesses.
As for the "witnesses" to those who saw him fly up into the sky, I give that every bit the credibility of the Elvis sightings.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 12586
Threads: 397
Joined: September 17, 2010
Reputation:
96
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 10:21 am
I haven't read the whole story, but did a crowd actually witness the resurrection, or wasn't it just the Marys...or one Mary...
I'm too lazy to look it up on the nets.
Posts: 736
Threads: 29
Joined: September 8, 2010
Reputation:
10
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 10:44 am
(This post was last modified: February 14, 2011 at 10:44 am by Skipper.)
(February 14, 2011 at 10:16 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: As for the "witnesses" to those who saw him fly up into the sky, I give that every bit the credibility of the Elvis sightings.
Jesus tribute acts running around after his death maybe? Vegas Jesus would be awesome!
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 10:59 am
(This post was last modified: February 14, 2011 at 11:03 am by DeistPaladin.)
(February 14, 2011 at 10:21 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: I haven't read the whole story, but did a crowd actually witness the resurrection, or wasn't it just the Marys...or one Mary...
I'm too lazy to look it up on the nets.
When it comes to the resurrection story, each one is comically different. The Brick Testament really underscores this point by merging all the versions together, giving it a "one day in the middle of the night..." feel:
The Brick Testament's "The Empty Tomb":
http://thebricktestament.com/the_life_of...20_01.html
Now the hundreds of witnesses claim doesn't come from the story of Jesus but the letters of Paul. In 1Cor 15, he tells the story that Jesus appeared to 500 witnesses. Who these people are is anyone's guess.
Quote:1Cor 15:4-6 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.
(February 14, 2011 at 10:44 am)Skipper Wrote: Jesus tribute acts running around after his death maybe? Vegas Jesus would be awesome!
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 4535
Threads: 175
Joined: August 10, 2009
Reputation:
43
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 5:02 pm
Paul wrote Cor before the earliest iteration of Mark was written down no?
.
Posts: 4067
Threads: 162
Joined: September 14, 2010
Reputation:
95
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
February 14, 2011 at 6:57 pm
If the resurrection is not true, then which is more likely:
(1) the witnesses were deceived, (2) the witnesses were lying, or (3) the witnesses are made up only.
|