I wonder, have I asked this before? What's your proof for the supernatural existing?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2024, 6:51 pm
Thread Rating:
The Problem with Christians
|
(March 7, 2016 at 8:56 pm)AJW333 Wrote: God could have made humanity with no free will. He could have created a bunch of automatons who never ever choose to do anything wrong. I would ask, what would be the point of that when you are a relational being? Could have If god is so great, doesn't he want his creations to be the best? If god is as powerful as he is, he can absolutely thwart evil. In fact, that would be the precise act of any god. I suppose we create super heroes to thwart the evil that the creation of god could not accomplish.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter (March 6, 2016 at 9:54 pm)Stimbo Wrote:Isaiah 45:11-12Quote:Universe (n.) "It is I who made the earth, and created man upon it I stretched out the heavens with My hands And I ordained all their host (stars). (March 7, 2016 at 9:25 pm)AJW333 Wrote: Isaiah 45:11-12 Sorry, that means nothing. A biblical quote has no relevance in reality.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
If I don't answer your posts immediately, it is because I am still replying to those on page 25. So bear with me as I try to catch up.
(March 4, 2016 at 11:15 pm)Kitan Wrote:(March 4, 2016 at 10:50 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: That passage is gobbledycock. (I just wanted an excuse to say cock.) Yeah, but gobbledycock is way sexier.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
(March 7, 2016 at 8:41 pm)AJW333 Wrote:(March 6, 2016 at 12:17 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: so you are declaring that life never came from non-life, and that is begging the question.Not at all. In the beginning God created life from the dust and then imbued all life with the capacity to reproduce after its own kind. This became the rule, or the law of how life was continued from that point on. There really is no conflict. Perhaps someone should contact the accreditation folks and tell them that a university let one of theirs got away with a degree in science and a failure to understand the difference between tentatively accepting something as "most plausible" and a faith-decree. If you truly can't understand what "I believe this only to the degree it has been proven" means, then you're not a scientist, no matter what your degree says. Abiogenesis seems to violate none of the principles we understand about the universe, while magical creation from the clay does violate several things we know about the universe. Your version literally requires magic (which you call divine creation, of course, but it's still magic), while ours is an attempt to offer a plausible explanation based on the physics/chemistry laws with which we are currently familiar. When it is proven, then we will accept it as proven. Right now, it is merely suggested, and we're comfortable with that. The "reproduce after its own kind" schtick is meaningless, and you would know that if you actually studied biology. In fact, it's a concept with so many grey areas that we have trouble actually defining what constitutes a species, let alone a new species or a divergence among a genetically-reproducing population.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
AJW333, did I ask you recently what your proof for the supernatural is? Or is it my mind playing tricks on me?
You know, evidence, as in scientific evidence.
This liar does not have a science degree unless he found one in a cereal box.
Mr. Hanky loves you!
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Christians vs Christians (yec) | Fake Messiah | 52 | 10261 |
January 31, 2019 at 2:08 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
Why do Christians become Christians? | SteveII | 168 | 36990 |
May 20, 2016 at 8:43 pm Last Post: drfuzzy |
|
Christians. Prove That You Are Real/True Christians | Nope | 155 | 57064 |
September 1, 2015 at 1:26 pm Last Post: Pyrrho |
|
Christians : my problem with Christianity, some questions. | WinterHold | 115 | 22723 |
March 28, 2015 at 7:43 am Last Post: h4ym4n |
|
The Problem of Evil, Christians, and Inconsistency | Mudhammam | 46 | 11685 |
September 24, 2014 at 5:22 am Last Post: genkaus |
|
The first Christians weren't Bible Christians | Phatt Matt s | 60 | 17649 |
March 26, 2014 at 10:26 am Last Post: rightcoaster |
|
Now Christians piss of Christians. | leo-rcc | 10 | 10274 |
December 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm Last Post: Anomalocaris |
Users browsing this thread: 26 Guest(s)