Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: A grammatical question
August 16, 2016 at 4:08 pm
You can also turn something down as well.
Like you can turn down the lights. Turn down the covers on a bed.
That doesn't mean you're disappointing them, however.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 28278
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: A grammatical question
August 16, 2016 at 6:46 pm
Turn someone down typically means that the baby is boiling over or is overly blackened.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: A grammatical question
August 17, 2016 at 7:43 am
If the wife had a volume control, it would bring a whole new meaning to "turn you down".
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: A grammatical question
August 17, 2016 at 9:07 am
(August 16, 2016 at 1:17 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I chose to turn down the request in the OP. Sorry to let you down.
Perfect post in this thread.
Posts: 6859
Threads: 50
Joined: September 14, 2014
Reputation:
44
RE: A grammatical question
August 17, 2016 at 11:23 am
(August 17, 2016 at 7:43 am)ignoramus Wrote: If the wife had a volume control, it would bring a whole new meaning to "turn you down".
You should be wary of being turned down in return
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)
Posts: 981
Threads: 74
Joined: July 1, 2015
Reputation:
10
RE: A grammatical question
August 17, 2016 at 1:57 pm
(August 17, 2016 at 7:43 am)ignoramus Wrote: If the wife had a volume control, it would bring a whole new meaning to "turn you down".
True but in women's case this usually means no sex, so I wouldn't recommend it unless you're bi.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: A grammatical question
August 17, 2016 at 4:02 pm
(August 17, 2016 at 11:23 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: (August 17, 2016 at 7:43 am)ignoramus Wrote: If the wife had a volume control, it would bring a whole new meaning to "turn you down".
You should be wary of being turned down in return
This would be an extremely accurate statement.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: A grammatical question
August 17, 2016 at 6:27 pm
I'm used to it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 301
Threads: 1
Joined: January 22, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: A grammatical question
August 18, 2016 at 12:59 am
(This post was last modified: August 18, 2016 at 1:04 am by wiploc.)
Hijack okay? Since this grammar thread seems to have run its course but for the wisecracking, I just wrote this:
Quote:Salt, and the sound of surf; I was near the ocean or some big lake. Cold dark and silent; it was night, well before dawn, before the morning birds riot. The smell of damp soil, predator scat, evergreens, blood (I assumed it was mine), and urine (also mine?).
And I'm wondering about the punctuation at the end. "?)." I never saw that before. Can anybody tell me whether it's good or bad, and what to do about it if it's bad?
Having asked the question, I'll now try to answer it myself:
If it's bad, then I have to recast the sentence somehow to avoid the problem. But if it's good it's distracting. That is, a lot of people will assume it is bad, and I should avoid causing them to have distracting thoughts about grammar when I want them to be involved in the story. So I should recast the sentence to avoid inciting misguided grammarians. Conclusion: Either way, I should recast.
But I'm still curious: Is it actually wrong?
Posts: 6859
Threads: 50
Joined: September 14, 2014
Reputation:
44
RE: A grammatical question
August 18, 2016 at 3:22 am
Since we are getting advice, I want to know comparatively which is worse, "worst of the worst" or "best of the worst"?
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)
|