New Clinton email controversy

[A Theist]

[...] a pay to play scam like Hillary's.

... written by a guy plumping for a candidate who's being sued for ripping people off through Trump U ...


... amongst other scams ...

Nice try. Not even close.

[Gemini]

... written by a guy plumping for a candidate who's being sued for ripping people off through Trump U ...


... amongst other scams ...

Nice try. Not even close.

You can pay money to advertise the fact that you're a moron, or you can declare for the Donald. You're thrifty.

[Thumpalumpacus]

... written by a guy plumping for a candidate who's being sued for ripping people off through Trump U ...


... amongst other scams ...

Nice try. Not even close.

Yeah, no. Give 'er a rewrite and resubmit. This time aim for accuracy.

[Kosh]

... written by a guy plumping for a candidate who's being sued for ripping people off through Trump U ...


... amongst other scams ...

Nice try. Not even close.

Oh!  You mean having sex with underage girls and threatening to make them and their family disappear.  Grabbing women without permission and then bragging about it on camera.  Filing bankruptcy over and over while shafting workers and contractors.  Double dipping on investors losses to avoid paying taxes ever....  Hiring foreign instead of American workers for his hotels.  Buying steel from China instead of America.  

I can't fathom the mental gymnastics you people need to go through to think this guy is looking out for anyone but himself and that he isn't a despicable human in every sense of the word.

[A Theist]

Nice try. Not even close.

Yeah, no. Give 'er a rewrite and resubmit. This time aim for accuracy.

No. That's not what I meant. I meant that Trump's issues don't come close to the level of severity as Hillary's. She and Bill used their Foundation to curry political favors through the state department for a variety of donors, including favors for donors from foreign countries. A federal felony.

[Casca]

And what were those favors she gave?

Having a meeting with them?

That's it?

I've looked, and there's no actual action that the state department took rewarding donor countries, other than "had a meeting." Whoopty woo, seems like a fair trade for millions of dollars into a charity. Not to mention as a secretary of state, she would've had meetings with them anyways.

[scoobysnack]

It's a lot worse then people realize. When the leaks came out, they didn't deny the emails were real. They claimed they were hacked by the Russians. It was actually people in various US intel agencies including CIA FBI NSA etc. They are sick of the corruption of the state dept and attorney general covering up the money laundering, treason, pay for play schemes, racketeering etc. If you rely on mainstream media to tell you what you know, it's no wonder this isn't being discussed. There is a counter coup going on in the US government right now, and the NYPD has info that will lead to the arrest of Clinton and others. It's the only reason she is fighting so hard to become president and get diplomatic immunity. She knows if Trump gets in, her scams will be prosecuted.

Check this out of former spy cheif/head of psychological warfare Dr. Steve Pieczenik expose the counter coup and how they are releasing info to wikileaks from within the US government.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM

[Crossless2.0]

The FBI investigations of Hillary is far more involved than her just being reckless and incompetent with classified information. She and Bill are using the Clinton Foundation as a pay to play scheme to enrich themselves, which involved selling political favors to big money donors, including favors to foreign governments. Is political corruption something you think is a good thing?

No, I don't think political corruption is a good thing and you will never find a post in which I suggest otherwise. You seem to mistake me for a Clinton advocate. I've made clear in a number of posts in several threads over the past weeks what my voting intentions are. Given the polls in my state, it is unlikely that I will vote for Clinton. I said that I consider her to be clearly the lesser of two evils if it's a question of her or Trump -- hardly a ringing endorsement.

Now that I've answered your question that was meant to deflect away from my question to you, would you be so kind as to answer mine? Do you seriously believe that a vote for Trump, given his lack of fitness for the office (temperamentally, his inexperience in government, poor grasp of policy, apparent ignorance of the way government actually works, his own shaky relationship -- to put it as generously as I can -- to the truth/reality, the fact that he is the only candidate in this race who actually encouraged foreign actors to hack his enemies, and his embarrassingly crass and boorish behavior in general) is a good idea?

I actually care that a President Trump will render us the laughing stock of the world. Perhaps you don't. If not, so be it. But I find it hard to fathom how anyone could be ok with that.

[Mister Agenda]

Don't be an idiot. It wasn't the word 'pussy' that was problematic. It was the word 'grab' in conjunction with the word 'pussy'.

Yes, but you are ignoring the context - private locker room talk among two close friends. And someone who takes what he said as some kind admission of guilt is the true idiot. Or just using it as a disingenuous excuse to manufacture a sex-scandal based on politically correct denial of human nature. Are you aware that the number one sex fantasy of women is being taken forcefully? Don't be such a prude as to suppose that none of your favorite alpha males on the left are all straight-laced prudes.

Be careful. You could hurt your knuckles dragging them on the ground like that.

[Mister Agenda]

Also, the FBI says that there is a 99% probability that five hostile foreign intel agencies have hacked into Hillary's private server.

Source?