The Cambrian 'Explosion' took about 20 million years to finish exploding.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 10:05 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Heated debate on evolution with brother
|
Guys, What took "longer"? The Cambrian Explosion or the Big Bang?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.  (January 11, 2017 at 9:25 am)ignoramus Wrote: Guys, What took "longer"? The Cambrian Explosion or the Big Bang? Do we include syndication?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Haha, good one!
{quickly looks up series TV "Cambrian Explosion" to start binge watching...}
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.  RE: Heated debate on evolution with brother
January 11, 2017 at 10:07 am
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2017 at 10:07 am by Edwardo Piet.)
The big bang is still happening. At an ever accelerating rate.
 RE: Heated debate on evolution with brother
January 11, 2017 at 10:37 am
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2017 at 10:40 am by Alex K.)
(January 11, 2017 at 10:07 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: The big bang is still happening. At an ever accelerating rate. It's true. When scientists talk about the big bang, they usually mean a whole range of very early times in the universe, not some singular initial point which arguably never occurred anyway, for which we have no reliable theory or much in the way of data, and which is more like a mathematical reference point than a real beginning. Which times you still include in the "big bang" is not really strictly defined. For example, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, the creation of the first primordial chemical elements, takes place over the course of minutes. I think most would agree that once recombination happened and atoms were formed, the big bang as such is over, but that's 400 000 years after the mathematical singularity!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
It should have been called The Great Expansion.
Almost as great as the latest Age of Empires 2 one. RE: Heated debate on evolution with brother
January 11, 2017 at 10:43 am
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2017 at 10:44 am by Alex K.)
In fact, creationists' strawman confusion of the "initial singularity" and the Big Bang theory closely mirrors their confusion of Abiognenesis with the Theory of Evolution. For bonus points, they then conflate Big Bang theory and Evolution, and what you get is the famous uninformed hot mess that is the creationist effort to attack fundamental science
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
 (January 11, 2017 at 10:43 am)Alex K Wrote: In fact, creationists' strawman confusion of the "initial singularity" and the Big Bang theory closely mirrors their confusion of Abiognenesis with the Theory of Evolution. For bonus points, they then conflate Big Bang theory and Evolution, and what you get is the famous uninformed hot mess that is the creationist effort to attack fundamental science No, man... they're just way ahead of you! Biological evolution uses biology. Biology is just a branch of chemistry. Chemistry is just a branch of physics. And the big bang is described with physics, too. So it's all physics. Now combine it properly!
Yeah it was called the big bang n a kind of mockingly "What so everything just exploded out of nothing?" kind of way.... just like creationists retards are all like "What so you think we're all the products of chance?"
If not The Great Expansion how about The Ginormous Inflation? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Why Debate a Teenager? | Goosebump | 16 | 4304 |
April 25, 2016 at 11:10 am Last Post: Aegon |
|
| Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false | Rob216 | 206 | 45789 |
November 10, 2014 at 2:02 pm Last Post: downbeatplumb |
|
| Free Will - A new angle on an old debate | ManMachine | 3 | 2165 |
June 11, 2013 at 7:22 pm Last Post: ManMachine |
|
| Flying in the face of the organic debate | Justtristo | 1 | 1645 |
April 24, 2013 at 9:03 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
| Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. | Mystic | 59 | 32421 |
April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
