What do scientists say about existence?

[brewer]

I think you're slipping Mario. Your new posting content decreases and your copy/paste increases. 

Might need to call upon god to give you strength and inspiration. 

[LostLocke]

I love that. I'm actually offering to engage him in whatever it is he's trying to do, but I can only assume he didn't even read my post.
I guess Mario has no actual point to anything he's saying here?

[brewer]

I love that. I'm actually offering to engage him in whatever it is he's trying to do, but I can only assume he didn't even read my post.
I guess Mario has no actual point to anything he's saying here?

The sad part is that he believes he is making an articulate point. 

But..... look at what else he believes.

[ignoramus]

Mario! I'm with you matey. Existence is understanding, accepting and being one with God! I know what you mean! I went to Sunday school heaps of times! I try to tell these rude gooses things but they think they know everything!

Mario, here's a secret. Be serious with them, ask them actual deep scientific questions and the idiots will tell you they don't know the answer! There's really not a lot they claim to know! They're dumber than I thought! Any normal person would just make something up, right?

Are you there Mario?

Hello? Check one two.

[Mariosep]

Okay, Mr.Obvious, you are of the Pauca sapienti school of writing. In which case, you can do that school even better, no need to join internet forums to write out your thoughts, just look up people and talk with each other with your eyes only, and make grunts instead of speaking words.

I like to invite you and me to exchange thoughts on what is existence, is that all right with you?

You want to tell me that for you Existance is, that is enough for you to know what is existence.

Well, it is one thing for you to think that you know what is  something, but it is another thing to know how to tell others what you know of something, in words.

Pray tell me, how else can you tell people who use language, i.e. words, what you know of the something by which you have a word for and they have the same word for, but you care to put what you both know, with words other than the word itself, like in the present context, what is existence.

You care to put into words what you both know of the something, in the present context, existence, so that you both, or you and I we both concur exactly in concise, clear, simple language i.e. words, but not including that word of present concern, existence, what is existence

We will do it this way, here below; unless you want us to do it in another better way, then I will cooperate with you totally.

Here, I will ask you this question:
How did you come to know of existence?

# #66 RE: What do scientists say about existence?

What a bullshit question anyways?
What is existance?

If that's as vague a term as you are going to use:
Existance is.
That is all.

-------------------

#80 RE: What do scientists say about existence?

[...]

Adressing Mariosep:

Thin veils of expensive words lugged together in an awfull, unchopped monstrosity of a sentence is not a display of intelligence.
Neither is a void question anymore than a vain and pathetic attempt at seeming deep.
Existence is. I dare you to find me a better way of putting it. Honestly. It's not using the word to explain itself. It's simply stopping where no more words are needed. Where the growing pile would be detrimental. Less is more. Brevity is key. A lesson you'd do well to learn.

Hint: The world is a much simpler place than you may make it out to be. And perhaps more absurd than any of us realize.

Your post was adressed above, for the convencience of readers. Because it's simpler. I'm a simple guy. And not a pathetic showboat desperate to get a rise out of people by being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.

[The Grand Nudger]

We come to know existence through our sensory apparatus.

[Mr.Obvious]

Okay, Mr.Obvious, you are of the Pauca sapienti school of writing. In which case, you can do that school even better, no need to join internet forums to write out your thoughts, just look up people and talk with each other with your eyes only, and make grunts instead of speaking words.

I like to invite you and me to exchange thoughts on what is existence, is that all right with you?

You want to tell me that for you Existance is, that is enough for you to know what is existence.

Well, it is one thing for you to think that you know what is  something, but it is another thing to know how to tell others what you know of something, in words.

Pray tell me, how else can you tell people who use language, i.e. words, what you know of the something by which you have a word for and they have the same word for, but you care to put what you both know, with words other than the word itself, like in the present context, what is existence.

You care to put into words what you both know of the something, in the present context, existence, so that you both, or you and I we both concur exactly in concise, clear, simple language i.e. words, but not including that word of present concern, existence, what is existence

We will do it this way, here below; unless you want us to do it in another better way, then I will cooperate with you totally.

Here, I will ask you this question:
How did you come to know of existence?

Hrm. Hmmm. Mhm. Ugh.

[Mister Agenda]

I think this is one of the more robust forums, one that Yrreg won't be able to drag or melt down.

[Cyberman]

We come to know existence through our sensory apparatus.

Plus, y'know, existing as aware entities in an existent reality. Which makes us more powerful than any god.

[brewer]

Mariosep = pseudointellectual. I am positive that exists based on sensory input.