Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.

[Cyberman]

Sockception!

[Minimalist]

Apparently we are pretending that there are no Sandy Hook truthers running around unsupervised.

Yes they are running around.... and losing lawsuits.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national...-1.3692369

Jury rules against Florida professor claiming he was fired for calling Sandy Hook massacre a hoax

Asshole.

[Athene]

LastPoet
Moderator Notice

Thread Closed pending staff decision. I have warned and it was ignored. If a civil discussion on these matters can't be achieved, then there is no point in keeping it. Yes, that is what we are. kindergarden keepers. As long people keep acting like, they will be treated as children.

I will not stand to see a decent discussion being destructed by personal quarrels.

I will report this post with a motion to ban Shell_B, Thena and Thump. I promised and I will deliver. Rules are for everybody.

Casually wondering why I'm up for banning, seeing as though I complied with the above Moderator warning fully, and have had absolutely ZERO interaction with the other implied parties since it was placed 5 days ago. Additionally, ALL of my replies from that point on were 100% insult AND profanity free, and strictly limited to the thread topic.

What purpose does the Warning serve if Staff can't even be bothered to see if members are actually displaying "undesirable behaviors" before putting them up for a ban? Seems very haphazard and reckless, to me.

Just wanted to have that on record in the event that I get banned for observing a warning.

[Amarok]

LastPoet
Moderator Notice

Thread Closed pending staff decision. I have warned and it was ignored. If a civil discussion on these matters can't be achieved, then there is no point in keeping it. Yes, that is what we are. kindergarden keepers. As long people keep acting like, they will be treated as children.

I will not stand to see a decent discussion being destructed by personal quarrels.

I will report this post with a motion to ban Shell_B, Thena and Thump. I promised and I will deliver. Rules are for everybody.

Casually wondering why I'm up for banning, when I complied with the above Moderator warning completely, and have had absolutely ZERO interaction with the other implied party since it was placed 5 days ago. Additionally, all of my replies  from that point on were 100% insult AND profanity free, and were strictly limited to the thread topic.

What purpose does the Warning serve if Staff can't even be bothered to see if members are actually displaying "undesirable behaviors" before putting them up for a ban? Seems very haphazard and reckless, to me.

Just wanted to have that on record in the event that I get banned for observing a warning.

And kind of wondering why i'm not banned .

[Athene]

And kind of wondering why i'm not banned .

At the very least, there could have been cause to present a motion made to ban you for veering from the thread topic. 
I didn't even do that, once the warning place. I did nothing that even gave a semblance of violating the rules, or even the non-specific warning. It's all very, very curious.
(no, not really).

Oh well. They'll do what they want.

[Shell B]

I actually agree. Thena stopped after the speed bump and shouldn’t be given any warning, let alone a ban. I’m sure that will be noticed in any staff discussion.

[Autumnlicious]

I've taken note of this and relayed it accordingly.

[SaStrike]

ban them all

ban for like 1 hour (preferably while they're sleeping)

[brewer]

Apparently I give up on threads to early. Off for some backwards reading. Will it be good?

[Cyberman]

I should clarify that we're not talking about account bans, even temporary ones; merely thread bans.