Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

Oh, now, All determination is negation. is given/granted truth on the basis of just charity only..now you add-in charity...Your sapientality appears to proceed by random free association, and, a rigid type like me cannot deal with the blurry form of flux that is you random raving imaginings!  Get the fuck off my fucking case, assbreath! Negatio.

I'm on the case of your argument, which, in addition to it's many other deficiencies, is a complete non sequitur.

A state off affairs where the truth of an assertion is irrelevant to the conclusion.

x

No, actually, now you are merely babbling pure assertion, after pure assertion, after pure assertion, in compound fashion.  Like I say, destroy determinatio negatio est.  You have clearly never even heard of syllogistic logic, you know, Aristotle?!  Ha, you are indeed a big dummy, now adopting Latin when, in fact, every goddamn thing I have ever heard you say is non sequitur, except you little epistle on crackers, that was excellent. Negatio.

[The Grand Nudger]

I'm on the case of your argument, which, in addition to it's many other deficiencies, is a complete non sequitur.

A state off affairs where the truth of an assertion is irrelevant to the conclusion.

x

No, actually, now you are merely babbling pure assertion, after pure assertion, after pure assertion, in compound fashion.  Like I say, destroy determinatio negatio est.  You have clearly never even heard of syllogistic logic, you know, Aristotle?!  Ha, you are indeed a big dummy, now adopting Latin when, in fact, every goddamn thing I have ever heard you say is non sequitur, except you little epistle on crackers, that was excellent. Negatio.

Why would I waste my time with that when it's truth is irrelevant to the conclusion?

[emjay]

It doesn't matter if you use "author" instead of 'author', since it just automatically converts it into 'author' in the former case. But whatever you do, as long as you have exactly two of them, and not mixed and matched types, it should be fine. So either two ", or two ', but not " and '.

The staff doesn't want you out, they just want to help. The staff here are very very objective and fair, and people are only ever banned for breaking the rules, not for personal reasons or for having unpopular opinions.

x

Yes, of course I would never mix up '' and'.  It is really really getting on my nerves that we are being observed by this "staff'' constantly, I got a snide remark from "staff" in the little green box, after writing something to Abaddon that was centrally  important to me, and cleared an enormous ongoing problem.  You are so right, I could use a break, this has been as horrid an experience as it has been s a great experience.  Duane

I've just tested, and the final thing is just to make sure there are no spaces inbetween the word 'quote' and the '=' and between the '=' and the author. So:

Code:

[quote='emjay']
This displays correctly.
[/quote]

Instead of:
[quote = 'emjay']
This doesn't display correctly.
[/quote]

In that case, yeah best take that break. But as I said, staff here are fair, regardless of their personal feelings, so as long as you don't break any rules, you shouldn't get into any trouble.

[negatio]

Yes, of course I would never mix up '' and'.  It is really really getting on my nerves that we are being observed by this "staff'' constantly, I got a snide remark from "staff" in the little green box, after writing something to Abaddon that was centrally  important to me, and cleared an enormous ongoing problem.  You are so right, I could use a break, this has been as horrid an experience as it has been s a great experience.  Duane

I've just tested, and the final thing is just to make sure there are no spaces inbetween the word 'quote' and the '=' and between the '=' and the author. So:

Code:

[quote='emjay']
This displays correctly.
[/quote]

Instead of:
[quote = 'emjay']
This doesn't display correctly.
[/quote]

In that case, yeah best take that break. But as I said, staff here are fair, regardless of their personal feelings, so as long as you don't break any rules, you shouldn't get into any trouble.

x

Oh, really, I am being warned 25% because of a space!  I got the formula I am using a dozen times from members, so I used it thinking they would not mislead me, when, in fact, I was misled.  All because of a little space extra ! This forum is, then the most absolute absolutism I've ever seen...I am disrupting because of one little space, wow. Thank you so much for making that so very clear, emjay.  Too too much, really. Negatio. The reason they are complete fucking assholes is that they could simply have informed me that I was using one extra space, and, thereby, I was overthrowing their little kingdom with one extra space, and must be punished. Absurd, stupid, high and mighty assholes. One space indeed!

[Losty]

Don’t be dishonest. You got the warning before because you were totally screwing up quote after quote even after being given instruction from staff on how to quote properly. And yes it does disrupt the forum. No one is banning you even though you’ve continued to fuck up quotes even after you were warned because at least it’s better now than before.

[KevinM1]

A moderator notice in a thread isn't a warning or any other form of punishment. It's just a moderator informing you that they've fixed your butchered quotes as best they could.

And, yeah, software requires precise inputs. Computers have no intuition. Simple forum software like this can't look at a malformed tag and go "Well, negatio really meant to do this, so let's do that instead of what he commanded me to do."

Welcome to the 21st century.

[emjay]

I've just tested, and the final thing is just to make sure there are no spaces inbetween the word 'quote' and the '=' and between the '=' and the author. So:

Code:

Instead of:
[quote = 'emjay']
This doesn't display correctly.
[/quote]

In that case, yeah best take that break. But as I said, staff here are fair, regardless of their personal feelings, so as long as you don't break any rules, you shouldn't get into any trouble.

x

Oh, really, I am being warned 25% because of a space!  I got the formula I am using a dozen times from members, so I used it thinking they would not mislead me, when, in fact, I was misled.  All because of a little space extra ! This forum is, then the most absolute absolutism I've ever seen...I am disrupting because of one little space, wow. Thank you so much for making that so very clear, emjay.  Too too much, really. Negatio. The reason they are complete fucking assholes is that they could simply have informed me that I was using one extra space, and, thereby, I was overthrowing their little kingdom with one extra space, and must be punished. Absurd, stupid, high and mighty assholes. One space indeed!

No! If they are warning you for disruption, it's for the disruption that has already happened throughout the entirety of this thread. Cocked up quotes, whether intentional or unintentional, do disrupt the forum, both since they do not accurately cite members words, as well as creating extra work for the staff to fix... and they make it an eyesore that is very hard to follow for anyone.

[KevinM1]

A moderator notice in a thread isn't a warning or any other form of punishment.  It's just a moderator informing you that they've fixed your butchered quotes as best they could.

And, yeah, software requires precise inputs.  Computers have no intuition.  Simple forum software like this can't look at a malformed tag and go "Well, negatio really meant to do this, so let's do that instead of what he commanded me to do."

Welcome to the 21st century.

Oh, shit, he did get warnings?

LMAO.

[negatio]

Nobody can make head nor tail of it and we are mostly atheists here anyway.




 

Nobody can make head nor tail of it
Jormungandr completely, totally, absolutely understood, all on her very own, the simple, simple, radically simple logical progression of, and the meaning of the disproof, and, reported that understanding to us.  She took the time to concentrate on what she was facing in the text, and came out a winner! 

Abaddon, a whole bunch of the time you have your facts mixed-up. Although I cannot possibly thank you enough for showing such concern for my situation here, wow, thank you!  Negatio.

[negatio]

Don’t be dishonest. You got the warning before because you were totally screwing up quote after quote even after being given instruction from staff on how to quote properly. And yes it does disrupt the forum. No one is banning you even though you’ve continued to fuck up quotes even after you were warned because at least it’s better now than before.

You have received a warning from the staff of Atheist Forums for disrupting the forum functionality by constantly misquoting. 

Apparently, the forum employs a demerit-type system of punishment, wherein the particular punishment platform entails a threshold-scaled scoring apparatus, whereby accumulated unintentional acts of human error add-up, until reaching a climactic point at which a destructive ''Staff" punishment misconduct is triggered, wherein a human person is harmed by the infliction of shame and exile via a Soviet-style jurisprudence.

Said staff misconduct, including Losty, consists in the mistaken human habit of exhibiting what is known as "existential absurdity", which exhibition of existential absurdity constitutes a particular instance  of a jurisprudential delusion/illusion, wherein something given and contained in the world is named as the reason for the punishment, in lieu of the true human basis for the punishment, which is actually to be found in the free  human project of the punisher(s).