Ontological Disproof of God

[Losty]

I am not bullshitting when I say you appear to be constantly on the rag! Negatio.

Your trollishness is showing again

[negatio]

Positing whatever is in your head in the third person is a hallmark of abject nuttery.

No, you are incorrect. I studied-up on the third person.  It is proper to refer to a persona in the third person, because the persona, in this instance, Negatio, really has nothing to do with the writing.

[Losty]

No, you are incorrect. I studied-up on the third person.  It is proper to refer to a persona in the third person, because the persona, in this instance, Negatio, really has nothing to do with the writing.

[negatio]

I am not bullshitting when I say you appear to be constantly on the rag! Negatio.

Your trollishness is showing again

No, I am being absolutely honest about the way Kevin, for the most part, comes-off to me, i.e., via intense hostility. For me to honestly tell Kevin so is not an attempt to mislead him, therefore not trolling.  You guys are so totally and destructively obsessed with this trolling superstition/paranoia that it amazes me! Negatio.

[The Grand Nudger]

Also, why are you calling Khem a cracker?

In fairness, it's the one thing the dolts gotten right in this entire low energy trollthread....even if he got it right on accident.

When you think about it, that's pretty similar to his contention that christer god is awfully dumb for a god. So..I guess two things right...ish? Not a good average considering the textwalls.

[negatio]

No, you are incorrect. I studied-up on the third person.  It is proper to refer to a persona in the third person, because the persona, in this instance, Negatio, really has nothing to do with the writing.

Perhaps it will help if I describe my particular consciousness somewhat.  I, through my studies in the phenomenology of human consciousness, have become what in known as "reflectively free", thereby, my consciousness traverses a larger spectrum of self-consciousness, or, of being-for-itself, than practically all other persons; i.e., I have a conscious knowledge of how I create my acts; I know that my consciousness is a reflection reflecting. Reflection reflecting is a duality wherein I can either be in reflection, or can be in reflecting, and, dependent upon which portion my consciousness I am in at any given moment, the subject-predicate structures of the way I express myself will differ. I can refer to myself as Other, because, I know that my being is a perpetual pursuit of becoming Other that I am; I am always that which I am not, and, am not what I am, in a perpetual flight toward my future. I am always and continuously Other, thus I refer to myself as Other than I am...Get it ?!  Duane

[The Grand Nudger]

I guess we can add crazy to the list.

[Losty]

Perhaps it will help if I describe my particular consciousness somewhat.  I, through my studies in the phenomenology of human conscious have become what in known as "reflectively free", thereby, my consciousness traverses a larger spectrum of self-consciousness, or, of being-for-itself, than practically all other persons; i.e., I have a conscious knowledge of how I create my acts; I know that my consciousness is a reflection reflecting. Reflection reflecting is a duality wherein I can either be in reflection, or can be in reflecting, and, dependent upon which portion my consciousness is in at a given moment, the subject-predicate structures of the way I express myself will differ. I can refer to myself as Other, because, I know that my being is a perpetual pursuit of becoming Other that I am; I am always that which I am not, and, am not what I am, in a perpetual flight toward my future. I am always and continuously Other, thus I refer to myself as Other than I am...Get it ?!  Duane

Your consciousness traverses a larger spectrum of self-consciousness than practically all other persons? I really doubt that, lol. Nice and arrogant though.

[negatio]

I guess we can add crazy to the list.

Oh, you mean add ''crazy'' to my list of characteristics which I see in you, or, that I am crazy?! I know that you understand that the way I address you is that I am funnin' you as a fellow Kentuckian, and, I love having a voodoo doll to stick pins in; so , it must be voodoo which I am really doing, with pins, not trolling; so, at my trolling trial, my defense will be, no, your honor, I am a practitioner of black magic, and, voodoo is may particular speciality, I had never heard of a troll prior to 8/20/2018.
I am not a racist. Khemical may have reinforced my theory that he is a cracker by his proud presentation of some cracker history. Anyway, I know that no one  is anything but a particular nothingness. Khemikal is not a cracker, he is a For-Itself.  Negatio.

[Losty]

You know I have no life when I resort to coming to this thread when I’m bored