(January 22, 2019 at 7:46 am)arewethereyet Wrote:(January 22, 2019 at 7:44 am)Brian37 Wrote: Way to marginalize the working class. Stating what more people need to know isn't playing victim.
I am old enough to remember the cost of living during Reagan and what it is now. If I was against the private sector I'd say that, now please go back to my OP and find out where I said I was against the private sector. I am not against success either.
But sorry, if marketing didn't work nothing would sell at all.
Maybe you need to show everyone here where the working class touched you?
I am working class; you twit.
So? Where did I claim you were rich? You keep wanting to read things in my words that are not there.
Maybe I need to dumb it down more for you.
1. I don't hate wealth or success. I do however think there is to much focus on fame and wealth and not on the stability of workers.
2. Find anywhere in any of my responses to you I claimed you were rich...... EXACT QUOTE please.
3......^^^^^^^ I did type that in a language you can understand right?
Plenty of people in the working class and the working poor vote against their own self interests without realizing it. And not just with private sector marketing, but political marketing can also get people to buy an unrealistic idea.
The world has enough rich and famous people. What the world needs is to care less about 62 billionaires whom have the combined wealth of 3 billion, and care more about global stability of people in the working class, PEOPLE LIKE YOU.
