Ban the loser above you.

[downbeatplumb]

Who doesnt.

Anyway banned for making me think about your scabby toes ...yuck.

[Violet]

@Individualistic Anarchist:

1. The concentration on the individual and his/her will in preference to any construction such as morality, ideology, social custom, religion, metaphysics, ideas or the will of others.[9][10]

2. The rejection of or reservations about the idea of revolution, seeing it as a time of mass uprising which could bring about new hierarchies. Instead they favor more evolutionary methods of bringing about anarchy through alternative experiences and experiments and education which could be brought about today.[11][12] This is also because it is not seen as desirable for individuals to wait for revolution to start experiencing alternative experiences outside what is offered in the current social system.[13]

3. The view that relationships with other persons or things can be in one's own interest only and can be as transitory and without compromises as desired since in individualist anarchism sacrifice is usually rejected. In this way, Max Stirner recommended associations of egoists.[14][15] Individual experience and exploration therefore is emphasized.

The [ s ] do not hold true to me and while I prefer my will be met: I do not object to hearing/compromising with the will of another.

I have no problem with revolution(s). What I do have a problem with is the obsession with replacing the government ousted. The problem is not specifically the government they aim to topple... the problem is government at all.
ow about this one, dear revvie?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism

---

Banned for thinking about scabby toes

[reverendjeremiah]

@Individualistic Anarchist:

1. The concentration on the individual and his/her will in preference to any construction such as morality, ideology, social custom, religion, metaphysics, ideas or the will of others.[9][10]

2. The rejection of or reservations about the idea of revolution, seeing it as a time of mass uprising which could bring about new hierarchies. Instead they favor more evolutionary methods of bringing about anarchy through alternative experiences and experiments and education which could be brought about today.[11][12] This is also because it is not seen as desirable for individuals to wait for revolution to start experiencing alternative experiences outside what is offered in the current social system.[13]

3. The view that relationships with other persons or things can be in one's own interest only and can be as transitory and without compromises as desired since in individualist anarchism sacrifice is usually rejected. In this way, Max Stirner recommended associations of egoists.[14][15] Individual experience and exploration therefore is emphasized.

The [ s ] do not hold true to me and while I prefer my will be met: I do not object to hearing/compromising with the will of another.

I have no problem with revolution(s). What I do have a problem with is the obsession with replacing the government ousted. The problem is not specifically the government they aim to topple... the problem is government at all.
ow about this one, dear revvie?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism

---

Banned for thinking about scabby toes

Anarcho-syndicalism is for a prefered peaceful transition, but they are not against action either. They typically frown on ideas of open revolution, instead prefering a "general strike" in which the workers unite, stop the flow of production, then regain the means of production from the hands of the few back into the hands of everyone as it should be. This will more than likely become violent, but not as violent as all out war. Government and "state" are shut down permanently. Syndicates (trade unions) then prop up the existing social infrastructure to ensure that services continue. These syndicates are nothing like the current trade unions, as they lack Business managers or any "leader" class. Lots are thrown and people are selected to represent that specific syndicate for that moment. All syndicate members are considered in the lots, not just a chosen few. Once that representation is done, the elected return to their normal work. the next time a representative is needed, lots are thrown and a new representative is chosen. In other words, there is no constant "leader class" or "boss class". Businesses are run the same way, with "team leaders" chosen that morning. the next morning a new team leader is chosen...if a team leader is even needed on the job to begin with. Rotating representation is a good thing as it ensures that everyone has a voice, wether minority or majority minded. Power is corruption, and by randomizing it as much as possible, the temptation is greatly reduced.

I figured you were more into the syndicate.

Banned for making me like you so much!

[Napoléon]

Banned for writing a fat paragraph which I really couldn't be arsed reading for me to think of a relevant reason to ban you.

[reverendjeremiah]

Banned for writing a fat paragraph which I really couldn't be arsed reading for me to think of a relevant reason to ban you.

It was more for her than you, but thats okay anyways, as you got yourself banned for it!

[Napoléon]

Banned for saying something which is blatently not true.

[reverendjeremiah]

Banned for saying something which is blatently not true.

Well, it is a forum. All are welcome to read it.

Still deosnt mean i will not ban you for it.

Sorry, but you forced my hand... I must ban you now.

[Phaedra]

Banned for having the same political leanings as me. :p

[reverendjeremiah]

DAMN! I thought I would be the only one with the guts to admit it on this forum.

Banned for making me feel in good company.

[thesummerqueen]

Banned for forgetting I agreed with you too.