Posts: 10694
Threads: 15
Joined: September 9, 2011
Reputation:
119
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 11:07 am
Um, the rule against posting the contents of private correspondence with other members. Even I know that.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Posts: 46122
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 11:26 am
(June 3, 2021 at 11:00 am)Drich Wrote: (June 2, 2021 at 4:46 pm)Fireball Wrote: As I said, there wasn't an invitation. You got offered help when your shit failed. I can actually understand why you would think that was an invitation, i.e., those two neurons. Oh, look, evidence of a sock account, right here in your words. Then, you got banned for SPAM. I notice that you didn't respond to that item, but I get it.
hey dummy.. quote number 1 IS AN INVITATION. IT is a solicitation to join the members of the defunct 'thinking atheist' on a new website. I would have never know or known to join. nor been allowed to join as per the admission that my name and avatar had been banned from my previous time with the thinking atheist. So not only was i invited I was also unban so i could join. Can't you see i would have never been apart of that forum if the admin did not want me there. I never heard of it until i was told of it, and i could not join even if i had heard and wanted to join as my credentials were pre banned.
(June 2, 2021 at 7:55 pm)Fireball Wrote: Sure am glad I'm not the one doing it. That banning was out in the open for all denizens of the site to see to see, in their ban log...and I never mentioned where it happened, either. He's got multiple priors, though.
So we went from i was never invited to everything was out in the open..
So which rule did i break? beside upsetting the patrons?
It’s quoted in the blue box, just above.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 29646
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 11:39 am
(June 3, 2021 at 11:00 am)Drich Wrote: (June 2, 2021 at 4:46 pm)Fireball Wrote: As I said, there wasn't an invitation. You got offered help when your shit failed. I can actually understand why you would think that was an invitation, i.e., those two neurons. Oh, look, evidence of a sock account, right here in your words. Then, you got banned for SPAM. I notice that you didn't respond to that item, but I get it.
hey dummy.. quote number 1 IS AN INVITATION. IT is a solicitation to join the members of the defunct 'thinking atheist' on a new website. I would have never know or known to join. nor been allowed to join as per the admission that my name and avatar had been banned from my previous time with the thinking atheist. So not only was i invited I was also unban so i could join. Can't you see i would have never been apart of that forum if the admin did not want me there.
The admin wanted warm bodies, not you specifically. A normal person would understand this. But you're so disconnected from reality in your narcissistic haze that you don't.
Posts: 1750
Threads: 0
Joined: December 11, 2019
Reputation:
9
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 12:08 pm
Posts: 9877
Threads: 21
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation:
79
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 12:22 pm
(June 3, 2021 at 11:39 am)Angrboda Wrote: (June 3, 2021 at 11:00 am)Drich Wrote: hey dummy.. quote number 1 IS AN INVITATION. IT is a solicitation to join the members of the defunct 'thinking atheist' on a new website. I would have never know or known to join. nor been allowed to join as per the admission that my name and avatar had been banned from my previous time with the thinking atheist. So not only was i invited I was also unban so i could join. Can't you see i would have never been apart of that forum if the admin did not want me there.
The admin wanted warm bodies, not you specifically. A normal person would understand this. But you're so disconnected from reality in your narcissistic haze that you don't.
He got banned from TTA, found a post here by a refugee that alerted the other refugees about another site when TTA closed (I'm being charitable), assumed that the invitation was for him, joined, and got banned again! Thinking that one's self was "unbanned" from a defunct website? Ya just can't make this stuff up! That makes 3 and potentially 4 sites that I know of where he has worn out his welcome. Ranjr's post is a classic explanation.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 12:50 pm
Some people's delusion simply has no bounds.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 1:30 pm
(This post was last modified: June 3, 2021 at 1:46 pm by Drich.)
(June 3, 2021 at 11:26 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (June 3, 2021 at 11:00 am)Drich Wrote: hey dummy.. quote number 1 IS AN INVITATION. IT is a solicitation to join the members of the defunct 'thinking atheist' on a new website. I would have never know or known to join. nor been allowed to join as per the admission that my name and avatar had been banned from my previous time with the thinking atheist. So not only was i invited I was also unban so i could join. Can't you see i would have never been apart of that forum if the admin did not want me there. I never heard of it until i was told of it, and i could not join even if i had heard and wanted to join as my credentials were pre banned.
So we went from i was never invited to everything was out in the open..
So which rule did i break? beside upsetting the patrons?
It’s quoted in the blue box, just above.
Boru
which rule did i break.... on the other website, that supposedly got me ban?
(June 3, 2021 at 11:39 am)Angrboda Wrote: (June 3, 2021 at 11:00 am)Drich Wrote: hey dummy.. quote number 1 IS AN INVITATION. IT is a solicitation to join the members of the defunct 'thinking atheist' on a new website. I would have never know or known to join. nor been allowed to join as per the admission that my name and avatar had been banned from my previous time with the thinking atheist. So not only was i invited I was also unban so i could join. Can't you see i would have never been apart of that forum if the admin did not want me there.
The admin wanted warm bodies, not you specifically. A normal person would understand this. But you're so disconnected from reality in your narcissistic haze that you don't.
1) that shifting the goal posts. 2) if they did not want me they should not have pm'ed me specifically. this wasn't an open invite, but rather a private invitation. 3)The reason why I was invited to join is not being discussed. it was the fact that i was privately invited to that web site and then expelled. those were the subjects of discussion. not some bullshit attempt to link me to a narcissist.. Because as i demonstrated I was singled out via private message and invited to a web site i never would have gone to otherwise, and even if i had.. the site was auto configured to deny me membership, meaning not only was the invitation valid a life long ban was lifted by an admin.. like it or not..
Posts: 28323
Threads: 523
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 1:55 pm
(This post was last modified: June 3, 2021 at 1:55 pm by brewer.)
I recommend that you use the same prayer for this that made your AIDS go away.
Then wait, a really, really long time.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 29646
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 2:00 pm
(June 3, 2021 at 1:30 pm)Drich Wrote: (June 3, 2021 at 11:39 am)Angrboda Wrote: The admin wanted warm bodies, not you specifically. A normal person would understand this. But you're so disconnected from reality in your narcissistic haze that you don't.
1) that shifting the goal posts. 2) if they did not want me they should not have pm'ed me specifically. this wasn't an open invite, but rather a private invitation. 3)The reason why I was invited to join is not being discussed. it was the fact that i was privately invited to that web site and then expelled. those were the subjects of discussion. not some bullshit attempt to link me to a narcissist.. Because as i demonstrated I was singled out via private message and invited to a web site i never would have gone to otherwise, and even if i had.. the site was auto configured to deny me membership, meaning not only was the invitation valid a life long ban was lifted by an admin.. like it or not..
Would you describe yourself as an engineer? Would that be correct?
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
June 3, 2021 at 2:02 pm
(June 3, 2021 at 12:22 pm)Fireball Wrote: (June 3, 2021 at 11:39 am)Angrboda Wrote: The admin wanted warm bodies, not you specifically. A normal person would understand this. But you're so disconnected from reality in your narcissistic haze that you don't.
He got banned from TTA, found a post here by a refugee that alerted the other refugees about another site when TTA closed (I'm being charitable), assumed that the invitation was for him, joined, and got banned again! Thinking that one's self was "unbanned" from a defunct website? Ya just can't make this stuff up! That makes 3 and potentially 4 sites that I know of where he has worn out his welcome. Ranjr's post is a classic explanation.
not post.. private message. from the private message i applied to the other site. which i got an auto decline. at the time a primary member/admin was both here and over there. so i told that person i was not able to join per my invite because the website says i was banned from the new forum. to which the admin lifted the bann from TTA. Plus i did not get banned for breaking any rules. over a series of months of answering questions and 'staying with in the guidelines' a few contributing members made so much stink (drich or us.) just before my bann my account was hacked and i wasn't able to access it. and this same admin set me back up. then i was banned a second time for my first offence back on TTA. I was told my bann should have never been lifted. and i did not have the right to be there, and i was removed without warning.
AF.com is the only other site i been bann from that i can remember besides TTA and the new version.(i dont remember the name)
aside from that i was kicked off face book for community guideline violations.. they never said which ones just gave me a list and told me it was one of those. i suspect it was either a post or meme that supported trump or i did have several fanatical atheists who said it was their mission to have me removed i assumed from their little facebook club.. but who knows. the only thing i miss about facebook is the market place. but i never really bought other people's junk.. just like digging through it.
|